Myocardial Efficiency of the Left Ventricle in Asymptomatic Patients With Aortic Valve Stenosis - a Prognostic Marker and a Target for Intervention? (MELVAS)

November 10, 2015 updated by: Henrik Wiggers, Aarhus University Hospital

Background - Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is the most common heart valve disease among adults in the Western world with a prevalence of 3 % in people older than 75 years of age. AS usually deteriorates over time leading to heart failure, with high mortality if aortic valve replacement (AVR) is not performed. Thus optimal timing of AVR is crucial, but can be challenging. Increasing life expectancy in our society will augment the therapeutic and socio economic impact of AS disease on our health care system. Therefore, new techniques for monitoring asymptomatic AS patients are needed. A potential approach is monitoring of LV myocardial efficiency (mechanical work/oxygen consumption). These measures have been suggested to be involved in the progression of non-valvular heart failure and closely related to prognosis, but never applied in a larger population of patients with AS. At present there are no recognized pharmacological treatments of AS. It is known that beta-blocker treatment in non-valvular systolic heart failure reduce heart rate, improves LV myocardial efficiency and reduces mortality. However, in patients with AS, the effects of beta-blockers are unknown.

Hypotheses - Treatment with the beta-blocker metoprolol succinate in patients with asymptomatic moderate to severe AS has beneficial effects on LV myocardial oxidative metabolism, myocardial efficiency and contractile function.

Objectives - To investigate if beta-blocker treatment in patients with moderate to severe, asymptomatic AS has beneficial effects on LV myocardial efficiency, contractile function and physical performance.

Design - A randomized double blind placebo controlled intervention trial. 40 patients with asymptomatic AS will be randomized to either per oral metoprolol succinate (N = 20) or placebo (N= 20) for 22 weeks.

Primary objective - Changes in myocardial efficiency

Secondary objectives - Myocardial oxygen consumption, Myocardial perfusion at rest, LV myocardial function, LVmass, Aortic valve area and transaortic valve velocities, 6 minute walking distance, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, Quality of life (estimated by Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire), LV wall stress

Methods - Patients will undergo echocardiography (resting and exercise), [11C]acetate PET and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aarhus N, Denmark, 8200
        • Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Brendstrupgaardsvej 100

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aortic valve area ≤1,2 cm2 and/or transaortic maximal velocity (VmaxAO) of 3,0-5,0 m/s
  • Sinus rhythm >60/min after 5 minutes of rest
  • LVEF >≥50%
  • Male or female
  • Age 20-100 years old
  • Safe birth control management for women of childbearing potential.
  • Negative urine-HCG for women of childbearing potential
  • Ability to understand the written patient information and to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systolic BP <100 mmHg after 5 minutes of rest
  • Left ventricular posterior wall thickness >17 mm
  • Signs or history of major myocardial infarction and/or severe ischemic heart disease
  • Severe asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification > I due to AS
  • NYHA > II due to non-cardiac causes
  • 2ᵒ or 3ᵒ atrioventricular block
  • Ongoing beta-blocker therapy
  • Ongoing verapamil or diltiazem therapy
  • Ongoing monoamine oxidase inhibitors therapy (except MAO-B-inhibitors)
  • Sick sinus syndrome
  • Atrial fibrillation or fluttering
  • Lack of stable sinus rhythm
  • Pheochromocytoma
  • Severe peripheral vascular disease
  • Intolerance of Metoprolol succinate or its excipients
  • Other disease or treatment making subject unsuitable for study participation
  • Intolerance of tracer used for [11C]acetate PET recordings
  • Participation in other intervention study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
Placebo
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Active
Metoprololsuccinate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
LV myocardial efficiency
Time Frame: Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 22 weeks of treatment
Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 22 weeks of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
LV oxygen consumption
Time Frame: Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 22 weeks of treatment
Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 22 weeks of treatment
LV perfusion
Time Frame: Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 22 weeks of treatment
Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 22 weeks of treatment
LV myocardial function
Time Frame: Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 22 weeks of treatment
Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 22 weeks of treatment
LVmass
Time Frame: Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 22 weeks of treatment
Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 22 weeks of treatment
Aortic valve area
Time Frame: Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 22 weeks of treatment
Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 22 weeks of treatment
Transaortic valve velocities
Time Frame: Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 22 weeks of treatment
Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 22 weeks of treatment
6 minute walking distance
Time Frame: Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 22 weeks of treatment
Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 22 weeks of treatment
N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide
Time Frame: Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 22 weeks of treatment
Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 22 weeks of treatment
Quality of life - estimated by Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire
Time Frame: Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 22 weeks of treatment
Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 22 weeks of treatment
LV wall stress
Time Frame: Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 22 weeks of treatment
Changes will be evaluated after an expected average of 22 weeks of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Henrik Wiggers, DMSc

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 4, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 11, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe