Wearable LITUS Device for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: a Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial

April 2, 2018 updated by: ZetrOZ, Inc.

ZetrOZ Wearable Ultrasound Clinical Study

The purpose of this study is to measure the effectiveness of a wearable therapeutic ultrasound device in patients with stage I and stage II knee osteoarthritis. The ability of the device to reduce pain, increase mobility, increase range of motion and muscle strength of the affected leg, and improve quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis will be evaluated.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is an eight week study to clinically evaluate the effect of the low intensity long duration ultrasound (LITUS) device on symptoms of patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis. The device, sam® has been FDA-cleared for use. For the first two weeks of the study, baseline data will be collected as patients report pain scores (NRS) three times per day. During the following 6 weeks, patients will self-apply the wearable LITUS device to their affected knee for 4 hours daily. Each day of the study, pain scores (NRS) will be recorded immediately before application of LITUS device as well as 30 minutes, 2-hours and 4-hours after applying the device. A quality of life assessment (WOMAC), muscle strength and range of motion assessment (JTech) will be performed prior to the patient beginning the protocol and at the conclusion of the protocol.

Up to 93 subjects will be recruited from neighboring communities to the study site. The study is designed to reach a target patient population which includes rural citizens and socioeconomic disadvantaged individuals where non-pharmacotherapies do not exist to manage pain. Subjects will be randomly assigned to active (60%) and placebo groups (40%). The sponsor and investigators are blinded as to which type of device each patient is assigned.

The study will be monitored by an external monitor and a data safety monitoring board (DSMB).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

93

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Dryden, New York, United States, 13053
        • Medical Pain Consultants

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Physician-diagnosed mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis (OARSI atlas grades 1-2) based on fixed-flexion x-ray radiological findings for osteophytes and joint space narrowing within the past 12 months
  • Fulfill the American College of Rheumatology clinical and radiological diagnostic criteria for knee OA
  • 35-80 years of age
  • Report a frequent pain score between 3-7 (NRS range: 0-10) during the week preceding enrollment
  • Report that knee pain negatively affects quality of life
  • Willing not to use any cream, gel, or topical solution during the administration of treatment other than the approved ultrasound gel provided to the subject at the initiation of the study
  • Deemed appropriate by their physician or by the study site physician to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cannot successfully demonstrate the ability to put on and take off the device
  • Display any condition which, in the judgment of the investigator, would make participation in the study unacceptable, including, but not limited to, the subject's ability to understand and follow instructions.
  • Have severe OA or have little to no cartilage in the knee
  • Have knee replacement, other surgical intervention, or hyaluronidase injection in the affected knee in the past 6 months
  • Are non-ambulatory
  • Participated in a clinical trial for an investigational drug and/or agent within 30 days prior to screening
  • Modify their medications during the course of the study (medications and doses must remain constant throughout the study)
  • Currently taking steroids
  • Have contraindication to radiograph
  • Have a secondary cause of arthritis (metabolic or inflammatory)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active ultrasound device
Patients receive treatment from the Sam Ultrasonic Diathermy Device for 4 hours every day for 6 weeks. The active device emits continuous ultrasound at 3 megahertz (MHz) frequency and 0.132 watts/cm2 intensity.
Patients apply the Sam Ultrasonic Diathermy Device daily for 4 hours of continuous therapeutic ultrasound at 3 megahertz (MHz) frequency and 0.132 Watts/cm2.
Other Names:
  • ZetrOZ ultrasound device
  • wearable ultrasound device
  • long duration ultrasound
  • LITUS device
  • long duration low intensity device
Placebo Comparator: Placebo ultrasound device
Patients wear the Sam Ultrasonic Diathermy Device for 4 hours every day for 6 weeks. The placebo device appears and operates identically to the active device except that it does not emit ultrasound.
Patients apply the Sam Ultrasonic Diathermy Device daily for 4 hours of continuous therapeutic ultrasound at 3 megahertz (MHz) frequency and 0.132 Watts/cm2.
Other Names:
  • ZetrOZ ultrasound device
  • wearable ultrasound device
  • long duration ultrasound
  • LITUS device
  • long duration low intensity device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Change From Baseline to Study Conclusion
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6
The numeric rating scale (NRS) was used to assess change in pain from baseline to study conclusion. NRS range from 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 the worst pain possible.
Baseline, Week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life (WOMAC) Change From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6
WOMAC questionnaire will be utilized (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index). WOMAC was divided into 3 categories: pain, stiffness, function and total score. The pain category consists of five scores from 0-10, 0 is no pain 10 is worst pain possible for a range of 0 - 50 points. The stiffness category consists of two scores from 0-10, 0 is no stiffness 10 is worst stiffness possible for a range of 0 - 20 points. The function score consists of 17 scores from 0-10, 0 is normal function and 10 is severely limited function, for a range of 0 - 170 points. Categories were multiplied by 10 for analysis. Total score is the sum of pain, stiffness, and function scores (range of 0 - 2400).
Baseline, Week 6
Range of Motion Change From Baseline in Treated Knee
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6
JTech equipment was used to evaluate range of motion range of motion using an inclinometer (www.jtechmedical.com) in flexion and extension of the treated knee. 0 degrees is fully extended and 150 degrees is normal flexion. Positive flexion change indicates improvement in flexion. Negative extension indicates improvement in extension.
Baseline, Week 6
Muscle Strength Change From Baseline in Treated Knee
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 Weeks
Muscle strength in flexion, extension, and rotation were measured using JTECH muscle testing equipment.
Baseline to 6 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ralph Ortiz, D.O., MPH, Medical Pain Consultants

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

March 11, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe