Evaluation of Vitoss With and Without BMA for Benign Cavitary Lesions

June 12, 2014 updated by: Orthovita d/b/a Stryker

A Combined Retrospective and Prospective Protocol to Evaluate Vitoss With and Without Bone Marrow Aspirate for Benign Cavitary Lesions

This is a retrospective, two-arm study reviewing the healing of cavitary defects in patients treated with Vitoss alone versus those treated with Vitoss with bone marrow aspirate (BMA). There will be a prospective follow-up visit at 24+ months to evaluate lont-term healing in patients identified during the retrospective portion of the study. It is thought that the inclusion of BMA will facilitate the resorption of the graft material, leading to better long-term bone healing.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Syracuse, New York, United States, 13210
        • Upstate Orthopedics, LLC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients will be selected from retrospective records from the investigators specialty practice.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • males and females >/= 18 years of age at the time of surgery
  • Patients treated with Vitoss alone or Vitoss with added BMA between 2004 and 2012
  • willing and able to provide Informed Consent to participate in and follow study requirements (including a radiologic assessment)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a known post-traumatic defect
  • active infection at the time of implantation
  • history of bone marrow disorders
  • contraindications to the use of supplemental BMA

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Vitoss Bone Graft with BMA
Patients with a benign bone lesion of the extremity or pelvis for which surgical curettage age was recommended and who received Vitoss bone graft with BMA to fill the cavity.
Vitoss is a synthetic calcium-based bone void filler made of beta-tricalcium phosphate.
Vitoss bone graft
Patients with a benign bone lesion of the extremity or pelvis for which surgical curettage was recommended and who received Vitoss bone graft to fill the cavity.
Vitoss is a synthetic calcium-based bone void filler made of beta-tricalcium phosphate.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Vitoss resorption into the native bone as observed via CT
Time Frame: minimum of 24 months post-operatively
Percentage of Vitoss resorption into the native bone will be retrospectively recorded in the Case Report Form at the 6 week, 3, 6, 12 and 18 month timepoints based on review of x-rays as well.
minimum of 24 months post-operatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Presence of graft within the soft tissue as observed by CT
Time Frame: minimum of 24 months post-operatively
Presence of the graft within the soft tissue will be retrospectively recorded in the Case Report Form at the 6 week, 3, 6, 12 and 18 month timepoints based on review of x-rays as well.
minimum of 24 months post-operatively
Presence of a rim of radiolucency surrounding the grafted defect as observed by CT
Time Frame: minimum of 24 months post-operatively
Presence of a rim of radiolucency surrounding the grafted defect will be retrospectively recorded in the Case Report Form at the 6 week, 3, 6, 12 and 18 month timepoints based on review of x-rays as well.
minimum of 24 months post-operatively
Size of the defect as observed by CT
Time Frame: minimum of 24 months post-operatively
The size of the defect will be retrospectively recorded in the Case Report Form at the 6 week, 3, 6, 12 and 18 month timepoints based on review of x-rays as well.
minimum of 24 months post-operatively
Bone trabeculation through the defect as observed by CT
Time Frame: minimum of 24 months post-operatively
Bone trabeculation through the defect will be retrospectively recorded in the Case Report Form at the 6 week, 3, 6, 12 and 18 month timepoints based on review of x-rays as well.
minimum of 24 months post-operatively
Persistence of graft material through the lesion as observed by CT
Time Frame: minimum of 24 months post-operatively
Persistence of graft material through the lesion will be retrospectively recorded in the Case Report Form at the 6 week, 3, 6, 12 and 18 month timepoints based on review of x-rays as well.
minimum of 24 months post-operatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 30, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 18, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 18, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2014

Last Verified

June 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1101-0014

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bone Diseases

Clinical Trials on Vitoss

3
Subscribe