Effects of Computer Navigation Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty on Endothelial Damage Marker Levels

February 2, 2017 updated by: Jih-Yang Ko, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Comparison of Navigation and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasties

  1. Prospective follow-up and comparative analysis of early, midterm, and long-term surgical results and complications between navigation assisted TKA and conventional TKA.
  2. Prospective comparative analysis of cytokines (including ICAM, VCAM, and PECAM) from blood, tissues, and drainage between navigation assisted TKA and conventional TKA.
  3. Prospective follow-up of surgical results of navigation-assisted TKA.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most successful surgery in orthopaedic field. However, occasional outliner from perfect alignment after prosthesis implantation and unavoidable complications are still concerns. The usage of navigation-assisted system on total knee arthroplasty has provided better accuracy of the component alignment and quantity in knee kinematics, which theoretically affords better and consistent functional outcome.

In addition to better alignment, the design of navigation system avoids violation of the medullary canal. This less invasive environment might be contributable to the less blood loss in the drainage bottle, less blood transfusion more stable hemodynamic status, fewer hospitalization days, and fewer complications.

Systemic emboli phenomena during preparation of the femur and tibia are well recognized during total knee arthroplasty. They are widely believed to be the cause of intraoperative hypotension and reduced cardiac output, which may lead to circulatory collapse, change of mental status or cerebral infarction. Kalairajah et al reported that navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty, when compared with conventional jig-based surgery, significantly reduces systemic emboli as detected by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Church et al undertook a prospective, double-blind, randomized study to compare the cardiac emboli load by tranesophageal echocardiography and demonstrated that computer-assisted TKA resulted in the release of significant fewer systemic emboli than the conventional procedure using intramedullary alignment. The increased blood loss in conventional TKA may be due to intramedullary jigging of both femur and tibia, bleeding from sinusoids at the cut cancellous bone surfaces with continuous suction drainage and more soft tissue dissection during balancing of the prosthesis. The investigators have underwent more than 730 computer-assisted TKA since 2005. The investigators data shows less bleeding and fewer transfusion after navigation assisted TKA. The investigators wish to further follow-up and delineate the differential clinical outcomes and perioperative markers (including ICAM, VCAM, and PECAM and other cytokines )between computer-assisted TKA and conventional TKA.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kaohsiung city, Taiwan, 833
        • Recruiting
        • Chang Gung memorial hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All the patients were recruited from the patient undergoing scheduled total knee arthroplasty in our hospitals (Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung medical center).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • degenerative osteoarthritis of the knee

Exclusion Criteria:

  • autoimmune diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, malignancies, previous knee surgery or post-traumatic arthritis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Navigation total knee arthroplasty
computer assisted navigation total knee arthroplasty without femur intramedullary involvement
Conventional total knee arthroplasty
conventional technique with femur intramedullary violation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ELISA analysis to compare concentrations of target molecules in serum and hemovac drainage between two groups
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
We collect the serum and sample from hemovac drainage 24 hours after the surgery, to measure the concentrations of target molecules (ICAM, VCAM, PECAM).
24 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jih-Yang Ko, MD, Chang Gung memorial hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

August 1, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB 100-0038A3
  • ChangGungMH (Other Identifier: ChangGungMH)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Computer-assisted Navigation Versus Conventional Total Knee Replacement

Clinical Trials on Navigation total knee arthroplasty

3
Subscribe