Pinless-Navigated Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty

April 16, 2018 updated by: Singapore General Hospital

Radiographic Analysis Comparing Pinless-Navigated and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The success of total knee arthroplasty depends on a number of factors including pre-operative range of movement, obesity, medical comorbidities, prosthesis design, preparation and implantation of the prosthesis, soft tissue balancing, as well as implants alignment. Optimal placement of the implants within 3° of the mechanical axis of the lower limb has been proven to reduce wear and early implant failure.

Compared to conventional techniques, computer-Aided Navigation total knee arthroplasty has been widely used in the last decade and have been proven to improve the accuracy of prosthesis placement and lower limb alignment by reducing the number of outliers with more than 3° deviation from the mechanical axis. However, its use also involves a steep learning curve, high initial capital cost and longer duration of surgery.

Traditional computer-navigated TKA using optical tracking systems also requires fixation of the femoral and tibial reference arrays to bone using anchoring pins. Complications reported with the use of these pins include either femoral or tibial fracture, pin site pain, pin site infection and osteomyelitis. The investigators study aims to investigate the accuracy of a new pinless navigation system for TKA that will avoid these complications.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The duration of surgery and length of hospital stay were recorded for all patients. Three radiographic measurements were recorded on the coronal films: 1) Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle (HKA), the angle formed by the mechanical axis of the femur (line between the centre of the femoral head and the centre of the knee) and the mechanical axis of the tibia (line between the centre of the talus and the centre of the knee); 2) Coronal Femoral-Component Angle (CFA), the angle formed by the femoral component and the mechanical axis of the femur; 3) Coronal Tibia-Component Angle (CTA), the angle formed by the tibia base plate and the mechanical axis of the tibia. The post-operative radiographic measurements were compared with the intra-operative readings from the pinless navigation system. The accepted values used in our study for normal alignment were: 1) 0° ± 3° varus/valgus for HKA; 2) perpendicular (± 3°) to the mechanical axis of the femur; 3) perpendicular (± 3°) to the mechanical axis of the tibia.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 169608
        • Singapore General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years to 90 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients between the ages of 45 and 90 diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the knee and scheduled for unilateral total knee replacement.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients coming for revision total knee arthroplasty
  • Patients diagnosed with inflammatory arthritis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Pinless-Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty
The patients underwent total knee arthroplasty using a Pinless-Navigated system that is designed to restore the mechanical alignment of the lower limb.
Brainlab VectorVision Knee 2.5 Navigation System
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
The patients underwent total knee arthroplasty using conventional technique.
Conventional technique.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiographic analysis
Time Frame: Up till 1 year
The number of outliers and mean value of: 1) Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle (HKA), the angle formed by the mechanical axis of the femur (line between the centre of the femoral head and the centre of the knee) and the mechanical axis of the tibia (line between the centre of the talus and the centre of the knee); 2) Coronal Femoral-Component Angle (CFA), the angle formed by the femoral component and the mechanical axis of the femur; 3) Coronal Tibia-Component Angle (CTA), the angle formed by the tibia base plate and the mechanical axis of the tibia.
Up till 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of surgery
Time Frame: Up till 1 year
Comparing the mean duration of surgery for both surgical arms.
Up till 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pak Lin Chin, FRCS, Singapore General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 30, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 18, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2011/519/D

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthropathy of Knee

Clinical Trials on Pinless-Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty

3
Subscribe