- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02236949
Sustainability of a Knowledge Translation Intervention to Improve Paediatric Pain
Sustainability of a Multidimensional Knowledge Translation Intervention to Improve Paediatric Pain Practices and Outcomes
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Alberta
-
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2G3
- Stollery Chidlren's Hospital
-
-
British Columbia
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6H 3V4
- BC Children's Hospital
-
-
Manitoba
-
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3A 1S1
- Children's Hospital Winnipeg
-
-
Nova Scotia
-
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 3J5
- IWK Health Centre
-
-
Ontario
-
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L1
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3H 1P3
- Montreal Children's Hospital
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1C5
- CHU St. Justine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Hospitals met the following inclusion criteria in at least four patient care units:
- distinct geographic location and administrative structure;
- minimum of 15 beds per unit;
- care for children exposed to painful procedures for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes; and
- implementation of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to manage pain.
The 16 participating hospital units had implemented the EPIQ intervention in the CIHR Team in Children's Pain study. Patients in the participating hospital units were eligible to be included in the determination of the pain practice and clinical outcomes if they:
- were between 32 weeks gestational age at birth and 18 years;
- received skin breaking procedures; and
- were admitted to the unit for >24 hours.
Surveys used to determine factors influencing sustainability were administered to health care professionals in all participating units, who had at least 1 year of professional experience, had worked on the unit for at least 6 months, and spoke English or French.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Pain Practice Change Booster
Pain Practice Change Booster Intervention: 12 months after the EPIQ intervention, and every 4 months for 2 years, a 30-60 minute standardized booster session was delivered to a small group of champions in each hospital unit randomized to the intervention group.
Two co-facilitators familiar with the EPIQ intervention conducted all booster sessions via teleconference.
Booster sessions included reviewing the effectiveness knowledge translation strategies champions implemented over the past four months to sustain and improve targeted pain practices; determining the sustainability of the pain practice changes, developing a commitment to change plan of action for the next four months.
|
See experimental arm for a description of the intervention
|
No Intervention: Usual Care Group
No interventions associated with the study were conducted on these units.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pain Process Outcomes (pain assessment)
Time Frame: T1 (Baseline)
|
Pain process outcomes included the proportion of children per unit whose pain was assessed and whether a validated pain measure was used.
Data were collected from 30 patient charts on each unit for the previous 24 hours at 3 time points, using the Canadian Pediatric Pain Research (CPPR) database, which was used and validated in previous studies (Stevens, 2011, 2012, 2014).
|
T1 (Baseline)
|
Factors Influencing Sustainability: The Alberta Context Tool (ACT)
Time Frame: T1 (Baseline)
|
The Alberta Context Tool (ACT) (Estabrooks, 2011) was used to determine the factors that influence sustainability in each of the 16 participating hospital units, including organizational culture, leadership, readiness to change, organizational complexity, professional autonomy and support within the workplace.
The ACT measures health care professionals' perceptions of these contextual factors at the unit and institutional levels.
The tool was administered in survey form to staff on the participating units at 3 time points.
|
T1 (Baseline)
|
Pain Process Outcomes (pain assessment)
Time Frame: T2 (12 months following the implementation of the Booster)
|
Pain process outcomes included the proportion of children per unit whose pain was assessed and whether a validated pain measure was used.
Data were collected from 30 patient charts on each unit for the previous 24 hours at 3 time points, using the Canadian Pediatric Pain Research (CPPR) database, which was used and validated in previous studies (Stevens, 2011, 2012, 2014).
|
T2 (12 months following the implementation of the Booster)
|
Pain Process Outcomes (pain assessment)
Time Frame: T3 (24 months following the implementation of the Booster)
|
Pain process outcomes included the proportion of children per unit whose pain was assessed and whether a validated pain measure was used.
Data were collected from 30 patient charts on each unit for the previous 24 hours at 3 time points, using the Canadian Pediatric Pain Research (CPPR) database, which was used and validated in previous studies (Stevens, 2011, 2012, 2014).
|
T3 (24 months following the implementation of the Booster)
|
Factors Influencing Sustainability: The Alberta Context Tool (ACT)
Time Frame: T2 (12 months following the implementation of the Booster)
|
The Alberta Context Tool (ACT) was used to determine the factors that influence sustainability in each of the 16 participating hospital units, including organizational culture, leadership, readiness to change, organizational complexity, professional autonomy and support within the workplace.
The ACT measures health care professionals' perceptions of these contextual factors at the unit and institutional levels.
The tool was administered in survey form to staff on the participating units at 3 time points.
|
T2 (12 months following the implementation of the Booster)
|
Factors Influencing Sustainability: The Alberta Context Tool (ACT)
Time Frame: T3 (24 months following the implementation of the Booster)
|
The Alberta Context Tool (ACT) was used to determine the factors that influence sustainability in each of the 16 participating hospital units, including organizational culture, leadership, readiness to change, organizational complexity, professional autonomy and support within the workplace.
The ACT measures health care professionals' perceptions of these contextual factors at the unit and institutional levels.
The tool was administered in survey form to staff on the participating units at 3 time points.
|
T3 (24 months following the implementation of the Booster)
|
Pain Process Outcomes (pain management)
Time Frame: T1 (Baseline)
|
Pain process outcomes included the proportion of children per unit who had painful procedures: (i) without pain management interventions, (ii) with pharmacological interventions, and (iii) with non-pharmacological interventions (i.e., physical or psychological).
Data were collected from 30 patient charts on each unit for the previous 24 hours at 3 time points, using the Canadian Pediatric Pain Research (CPPR) database, which was used and validated in previous studies (Stevens, 2011, 2012, 2014).
|
T1 (Baseline)
|
Pain Process Outcomes (pain management)
Time Frame: T2 (12 months following the implementation of the Booster)
|
Pain process outcomes included the proportion of children per unit who had painful procedures: (i) without pain management interventions, (ii) with pharmacological interventions, and (iii) with non-pharmacological interventions (i.e., physical or psychological).
Data were collected from 30 patient charts on each unit for the previous 24 hours at 3 time points, using the Canadian Pediatric Pain Research (CPPR) database, which was used and validated in previous studies (Stevens, 2011, 2012, 2014).
|
T2 (12 months following the implementation of the Booster)
|
Pain Process Outcomes (pain management)
Time Frame: T3 (24 months following the implementation of the Booster)
|
Pain process outcomes included the proportion of children per unit who had painful procedures: (i) without pain management interventions, (ii) with pharmacological interventions, and (iii) with non-pharmacological interventions (i.e., physical or psychological).
Data were collected from 30 patient charts on each unit for the previous 24 hours at 3 time points, using the Canadian Pediatric Pain Research (CPPR) database, which was used and validated in previous studies (Stevens, 2011, 2012, 2014).
|
T3 (24 months following the implementation of the Booster)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Clinical Pain Outcome: Pain Intensity
Time Frame: T1 (Baseline)
|
Pain intensity was measured through patient observation during routinely scheduled painful procedures at 3 time points, using one of four validated, age-appropriate measures: Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) (Stevens et al., 1996) Faces-Legs-Arms-Cry-Consolability Scale (FLACC) (Merkel et al., 1997), Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) (Hicks et al., 2001), and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (Jensen et a., 1986).
Data were collected by local pain experts, experienced pediatric clinicians, who were trained on the four measures to ensure accurate and standardized use.
|
T1 (Baseline)
|
Clinical Pain Outcome: Pain Intensity
Time Frame: T2 (12 months following the implementation of the Booster)
|
Pain intensity was measured through patient observation during routinely scheduled painful procedures at 3 time points, using one of four validated, age-appropriate measures: Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) (Stevens et al., 1996) Faces-Legs-Arms-Cry-Consolability Scale (FLACC) (Merkel et al., 1997), Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) (Hicks et al., 2001), and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (Jensen et a., 1986).
Data were collected by local pain experts, experienced pediatric clinicians, who were trained on the four measures to ensure accurate and standardized use.
|
T2 (12 months following the implementation of the Booster)
|
Clinical Pain Outcome: Pain Intensity
Time Frame: T3 (24 months following the implementation of the Booster)
|
Pain intensity was measured through patient observation during routinely scheduled painful procedures at 3 time points, using one of four validated, age-appropriate measures: Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) (Stevens et al., 1996) Faces-Legs-Arms-Cry-Consolability Scale (FLACC) (Merkel et al., 1997), Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) (Hicks et al., 2001), and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (Jensen et a., 1986).
Data were collected by local pain experts, experienced pediatric clinicians, who were trained on the four measures to ensure accurate and standardized use.
|
T3 (24 months following the implementation of the Booster)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Bonnie Stevens, RN, PhD, The Hospital for Sick Children
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Stevens BJ, Yamada J, Estabrooks CA, Stinson J, Campbell F, Scott SD, Cummings G; CIHR Team in Children's Pain. Pain in hospitalized children: Effect of a multidimensional knowledge translation strategy on pain process and clinical outcomes. Pain. 2014 Jan;155(1):60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
- Stevens BJ, Harrison D, Rashotte J, Yamada J, Abbott LK, Coburn G, Stinson J, Le May S; CIHR Team in Children's Pain. Pain assessment and intensity in hospitalized children in Canada. J Pain. 2012 Sep;13(9):857-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.05.010.
- Stevens BJ, Abbott LK, Yamada J, Harrison D, Stinson J, Taddio A, Barwick M, Latimer M, Scott SD, Rashotte J, Campbell F, Finley GA; CIHR Team in Children's Pain. Epidemiology and management of painful procedures in children in Canadian hospitals. CMAJ. 2011 Apr 19;183(7):E403-10. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101341. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
- Estabrooks CA, Squires JE, Hutchinson AM, Scott S, Cummings GG, Kang SH, Midodzi WK, Stevens B. Assessment of variation in the Alberta Context Tool: the contribution of unit level contextual factors and specialty in Canadian pediatric acute care settings. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 4;11:251. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-251.
- Stevens BJ, Yamada J, Promislow S, Barwick M, Pinard M; CIHR Team in Children's Pain. Pain Assessment and Management After a Knowledge Translation Booster Intervention. Pediatrics. 2016 Oct;138(4):e20153468. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3468. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1000026324
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain
-
Flowonix MedicalApproved for marketingBack Pain | Leg Pain | Trunk Pain | Intractable Pain | Arm Pain
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinZealand University Hospital; European Regional Development Fund; Design School...CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain Measurement | Pain, CancerGermany
-
Universitat Jaume ICompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | OncologySpain
-
Dr. Negrin University HospitalCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, ChronicSpain
-
George Washington UniversityRecruitingCervical Fusion | Pain, Back | Pain, Neck | Myofacial PainUnited States
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
University of Campinas, BrazilCompletedPREGNANCY | LUMBAR BACK PAIN | PELVIC PAIN
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | VATSTurkey
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedPain, Radiating | Pain, Burning | Pain, Crushing | Pain, Migratory | Pain, SplittingUnited States, France, Spain, Poland, Portugal
-
susanne beckerSNSFCompletedLow Back Pain | Pain, Acute | Pain, ChronicSwitzerland
Clinical Trials on Pain Practice Change Booster Intervention
-
University of MiamiCompleted
-
Laval UniversityCanadian Cancer Society (CCS)Completed
-
University of RochesterNational Institutes of Health (NIH)CompletedSmoking Cessation | Health Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationUnited States
-
Universitat de LleidaEnrolling by invitationChronic Nonspecific Low Back PainSpain
-
Georgia State UniversityArizona State UniversityEnrolling by invitationAlcohol Drinking | Sexual AssaultUnited States
-
University of South FloridaTemple University; National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and... and other collaboratorsRecruitingMental Illness | Behavior Disorders | Psychiatric Diagnosis | Psychiatric Disorders | Severe Mental Illness | Psychiatric Diseases | Psychiatric IllnessUnited States
-
Western University, CanadaCompletedParkinson Disease | Driving ImpairedCanada
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingMalignant Solid Neoplasm | Hematopoietic and Lymphoid System NeoplasmUnited States
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center at...Massachusetts General Hospital; 59th Medical Wing; Uniformed Services University... and other collaboratorsRecruitingChronic PainUnited States