- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02242591
Effect of Adductor Canal Block vs. Placebo on Muscle Strength, Mobilisation and Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Effect of Adductor Canal Block vs. Placebo on Muscle Strength, Mobilisation and Pain on the First Post-operative Day After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Patients will be included on the first day after TKA surgery and randomized in two groups. Each group will receive 2 ACB with a 1 hour interval, one ACB with an active drug, Ropivacaine, and another ACB with a placebo drug, Saline.
At T0, arm ACB_active/placebo will receive the active ACB with Ropivacaine followed by the placebo ACB at T60 (60 minutes after T0).
At T0, arm ACB_placebo/active will receive the placebo ACB with Saline followed by the active ACB with Ropivacaine at T60 (60 minutes after T0).
Outcome measurements will be made at T60, 1 hour after the first ACB, and the difference in outcome between the groups will be compared.
Baseline values will be measured prior to the first ACB. Final measurements at T120 (120 minutes after the initial ACB), will determine if the differences between the groups are eliminated, since both groups then have received an active ACB.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Hellerup, Denmark, 2900
- Gentofte Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who have had a Total Knee Arthroplasty surgery within 2 days (1.postoperative day on inclusion)
- Written informed consent.
- ASA 1-3
Exclusion Criteria:
- Non-cooperative patients
- Patients who have already had a peripheral or central block post surgery.
- Patients who are not able to perform a TUG test pre surgery.
- Patients who do not understand or speak Danish.
- Patient who are allergic to the drugs used in this research.
- Patients with alcohol- or drug abuse - determined by investigator.
- Patients with peripheral sensory neuropathy in their lower extremities.
- Pregnant patients.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: ACB_active/placebo
Patients will receive the first ACB with a active drug, 30 ml bolus Ropivacaine 7,5 mg/ml at T0. First outcome measurement are made one hour after the first ACB, prior to their second ACB. At T60 (60 minutes after T0), patients will receive their second ACB with the placebo drug, 30 ml bolus Saline and outcome measures performed again at T120(120 minutes after T0). The measurements for baseline and outcome will be made in following order: VAS pain score at rest - VAS pain score during active flexion of the knee - Muscle strength - TUG test - Highest VAS pain score during TUG test |
Other Names:
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: ACB_placebo/active
Patients will receive the first ACB with placebo, 30 ml isotonic saline at T0. First outcome measurement are made one hour after the first ACB, prior to their second ACB. At T60(60 minutes after T0), patients will receive their second ACB with the ropivacaine 7,5 mg/ml 30 ml and outcome measures performed again at T120(120 minutes after T0). The measurements for baseline and outcome will be made in following order: VAS pain score at rest - VAS pain score during active flexion of the knee - Muscle strength - TUG test - Highest VAS pain score during TUG test |
Other Names:
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Difference between groups in muscle strength of the quadriceps femoris muscle.
Time Frame: 60 minutes after first ACB (T60)
|
Muscle strength is assessed as maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) using a hand-held dynamometer.3
consecutive measurements will be made and the average used.
Results for each group will be presented as percentage of baseline values.
The primary outcome is the difference in MVIC between the groups.
|
60 minutes after first ACB (T60)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Difference between groups in muscle strength of the quadriceps femoris muscle.
Time Frame: 120 minutes after initial ACB (T120)
|
Same as primary outcome
|
120 minutes after initial ACB (T120)
|
VAS pain scores at rest
Time Frame: 60 minutes after the initial ACB (T60) and 120 minutes after initial ACB (T120)
|
Pain at rest (VAS 0-100 mm) one hour after the first and second ACB. Results will be compared between the two groups. VAS pain scores at rest will be inquired before any other outcome measurements. |
60 minutes after the initial ACB (T60) and 120 minutes after initial ACB (T120)
|
VAS pain score during TUG test.
Time Frame: 60 minutes after the initial ACB (T60) and 120 minutes after initial ACB (T120
|
Highest VAS (0-100 mm) pain score during TUG test will be inquired for each TUG test.
Results will be compared between the two groups.
|
60 minutes after the initial ACB (T60) and 120 minutes after initial ACB (T120
|
Timed Up and Go(TUG) test
Time Frame: 60 minutes after the initial ACB (T60) and 120 minutes after initial ACB (T120
|
Time (seconds) to complete a TUG test measured one hour after the first and second ACB.
Results will be compared between the two groups.
|
60 minutes after the initial ACB (T60) and 120 minutes after initial ACB (T120
|
VAS pain scores during 45 degrees active flexion of the knee
Time Frame: 60 minutes after the initial ACB (T60) and 120 minutes after initial ACB (T120
|
Specification of pain (VAS 0-100 mm) during 45 degrees active flexion of the knee one hour after first and second ACB.
Results will be compared between the two groups.
|
60 minutes after the initial ACB (T60) and 120 minutes after initial ACB (T120
|
Sub-group analysis of muscle strength and mobility acconding to baseline VAS during active flexion of the knee prior to the first block
Time Frame: 60 minutes after first ACB (T60)
|
According to their specified VAS (0-100 mm) pain score during active flexion of the knee prior to the first block, patients will be divided into two groups.
Group 1 VAS 0-59 mm and group 2 with VAS 60-100 mm.
Results within the two groups will be compared: e.g is there a difference in MVIC in the subgroup of patients scoring VAS 0-59 during active knee flexion at baseline?
and is this difference larger in the subgroup of patients scoring VAS 60-100?
|
60 minutes after first ACB (T60)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ulrik Grevstad, MD, Gentofte Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2014-002245-21
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Knee Replacement Arthroplasty
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusCompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipItaly
-
Bornholms RegionskommuneCompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipDenmark
-
Central DuPage HospitalTerminatedTotal Knee Replacement | Replacement, Total Knee | Arthroplasty, Knee ReplacementUnited States
-
Campus Bio-Medico UniversityRecruitingArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipItaly
-
SCRI Development Innovations, LLCWithdrawnArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipUnited States
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreActive, not recruitingArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipCanada
-
University of British ColumbiaThe Arthritis Society, Canada; Centre for Aging SMART; Centre for Advancing Health...Not yet recruitingArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipCanada
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceRecruitingArthroplasty, Hip Replacement | Arthroplasty, Knee ReplacementFrance
-
Henry Ford Health SystemConsumer Sleep SolutionsNot yet recruitingArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipUnited States
-
Haute Ecole de Santé VaudCompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipSwitzerland
Clinical Trials on Saline
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterActive, not recruitingPostural Tachycardia SyndromeUnited States
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityCystic Fibrosis FoundationCompletedCystic Fibrosis
-
University Hospital Inselspital, BerneCompletedCardiovascular Diseases | Valvular Heart DiseaseSwitzerland
-
Aalborg UniversityThe Danish Rheumatism AssociationCompleted
-
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal UniversityUnknownOtorhinolaryngologic Diseases | RhinosinusitisSaudi Arabia
-
Dr. Michael FlavinWithdrawn
-
Szpital im. Św. Jadwigi ŚląskiejRecruiting
-
Makassed General HospitalCompletedLength of Hospital StayLebanon
-
Qassim UniversityCompletedApical Periodontitis | Post Operative Pain | Dental Pulp NecrosesSaudi Arabia
-
University of Washington, the Collaborative Health...Cystic Fibrosis FoundationCompleted