Testosterone Revival Abolishes Negative Symptoms, Fosters Objective Response and Modulates Enzalutamide Resistance (Transformer)

A Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Bipolar Androgen Therapy vs. Enzalutamide in Asymptomatic Men With Castration Resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Asymptomatic men with progressive metastatic Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) post- treatment with abiraterone acetate (pre-chemotherapy for metastatic disease) will be treated on a randomized, multi-Institutional open label study to determine if treatment with intramuscular T given on a dose/schedule designed to result in rapid cycling from the polar extremes of supraphysiologic to near castrate levels [i.e. Bipolar Androgen Therapy (BAT)] will improve primary and secondary objectives vs. enzalutamide as standard therapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Eligible patients will have metastatic CRPC with no disease related symptoms and progression on Androgen deprivation therapy and will have progressed post-treatment with abiraterone. Patients will continue on Androgen deprivation therapy with Luteinising Hormone Releasing Hormone agonist (i.e. Zoladex, Trelstar, Eligard or Lupron) or Luteinising Hormone Releasing Hormone antagonist (Degarelix) if not surgically castrated throughout the duration of the study to inhibit endogenous testosterone production. Patients will be randomized 1:1 and stratified based on duration of prior abiraterone acetate therapy (6 months or less or greater than 6 months). Patients randomized to BAT (Arm A) will receive intramuscular injections with either testosterone cypionate or testosterone enanthate at a dose of 400 mg every 28 days. This dose was selected based on data demonstrating that it produces an initial supraphysiologic serum level of T (i.e. > 1500 ng/dL or 3-10 times normal level) with eugonadal levels achieved at the end of two weeks and near castrate levels after 28 days. Patients randomized to enzalutamide (Arm B) will receive daily oral dose of 160 mg. Each cycle is defined as 28 days.

Patients will have Prostate-specific antigen level and symptoms assessment checked every cycle. Every 3 cycles patients will have repeat bone/CT scans to evaluate treatment response status. On CT scan, radiographic progression will be defined by RECIST criteria (i.e. >20% increase in the sum of target lesions). On bone scan, radiographic progression will be defined by PCWG2 criteria as ≥ 2 new bone lesions. However, for the first reassessment scan only, patients should remain on study and have a confirmatory scan performed 12 weeks (3 cycles) later. If this confirmatory scan shows 2 or more additional new lesions, this defines progression. The date of progression is the date of the first reassessment bone scan. If the confirmatory scan does not show any additional new lesions, patient remains on study. If progression is observed on subsequent bone scans, a confirmatory scan is not required; the date of this bone scan is the date of progression.

Patients with Prostate-specific antigen progression but with disease response or stable disease on imaging studies will remain on study until radiographic or other clinical progression criteria are met. Patients with radiographic disease progression will not receive continued BAT (arm A) or enzalutamide (arm B) and will be eligible for crossover to the opposite therapy. Patients on the BAT arm A can cross over to receive enzalutamide at time of progression or can choose to go off study and be treated with other standard of care treatments. Patients on the enzalutamide arm B will be allowed to cross-over to receive BAT or can choose to go off study and be treated with other standard of care treatments.

Patients with clinical progression due to prostate cancer must meet study exclusion criteria to be permitted to cross-over to the opposite treatment. Patients with clinical progression due to pain from prostate cancer are not permitted to cross-over.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

222

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • Unversity of Alabama
    • California
      • Duarte, California, United States, 91010
        • City of Hope
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado Cancer Center
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20016
        • Sibley Memorial Hospital
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30318
        • Piedmont Cancer Institute
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • University of Kansas Cancer Center
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
        • Tulane University Medical Center
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • University of Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205
        • SKCCC at Johns Hopkins
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68130
        • Neraska Cancer Specialists
    • New Jersey
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08901
        • Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15212
        • Allegheny Health Network
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112
        • Huntsman Cancer Institute
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98109
        • University of Washing

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance status ≤2
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Histologically-confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate
  • Treated with continuous androgen ablative therapy (either surgical castration or luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist/antagonist)
  • Documented castrate level of serum testosterone (<50 ng/dl)
  • Metastatic disease radiographically documented by CT/MRI or bone scan.
  • Must have had disease progression while on abiraterone acetate alone or abiraterone acetate in combination with other investigational agents based on:

    • Prostate-specific antigen progression defined as an increase in Prostate-specific antigen, as determined by 2 separate measurements taken at least 1 week apart

And/Or

  • Radiographic disease progression, based on RECIST 1.1 in patients with measurable soft tissue lesions, or PCWG2 for patients with bone disease

    • Screening Prostate-specific antigen must be ≥ 1.0 ng/mL.
    • Prior treatment with additional second line hormone therapies is allowed.
    • No prior treatment with enzalutamide, Apalutamide (ARN-509), Darolutamide (ODM-201), galeterone or other investigational androgen receptor targeted treatment is allowed.
    • Prior docetaxel for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer is permitted if ≤ 6 doses were given in conjunction with first-line androgen deprivation therapy and >12 months since last dose of docetaxel.
    • Prior treatment with Provenge vaccine and 223Radium (Xofigo) is allowed if >4 weeks from last dose.
    • Patients must be withdrawn from abiraterone for ≥ 2 weeks.
    • Patients must be weaned off prednisone and be off therapy for ≥ 1 week prior to starting therapy.
    • Acceptable liver function:
  • Bilirubin < 2.5 times institutional upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • aspartate aminotransferase (SGOT) and alanine aminotransferase (SGPT) < 2.5 times ULN

    - Acceptable renal function:

  • Serum creatinine < 2.5 times ULN

    - Acceptable hematologic status:

  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1500 cells/mm3 (1.5 ×109/L)
  • Platelet count ≥ 100,000 platelet/mm3 (100 ×109/L)
  • Hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL.

    • At least 4 wks since prior radiation.
    • Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
    • Patients on either treatment arm will be considered for crossover if they demonstrate evidence of radiographic disease progression.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pain due to metastatic prostate cancer requiring treatment intervention.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance status ≥3
  • Prior treatment with enzalutamide is prohibited
  • Prior treatment with docetaxel or cabazitaxel for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer is prohibited.
  • Requires urinary catheterization for voiding due to obstruction secondary to prostatic enlargement well documented to be due to prostate cancer or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
  • Evidence of disease in sites or extent that, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the patient at risk from therapy with testosterone (e.g. femoral metastases with concern over fracture risk, severe and extensive spinal metastases with concern over spinal cord compression, extensive liver metastases)
  • Evidence of serious and/or unstable pre-existing medical, psychiatric or other condition (including laboratory abnormalities) that could interfere with patient safety or provision of informed consent to participate in this study
  • Active uncontrolled infection, including known history of HIV/AIDS or hepatitis B or C.
  • Any psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical condition that could potentially interfere with compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule.
  • Patients receiving anticoagulation therapy with Coumadin are not eligible for study. [Patients on non-coumadin anticoagulants (Lovenox, Xarelto, etc.) are eligible for study. Patients on Coumadin who can be transitioned to lovenox prior to starting study treatments will be eligible].
  • Patients with prior history of a thromboembolic event within the last 12 months that is not being treated with systemic anticoagulation are excluded.
  • Patients allergic to sesame seed oil or cottonseed oil are excluded.
  • Major surgery (eg, requiring general anesthesia) within 3 weeks before screening, or has not fully recovered from prior surgery (ie, unhealed wound). Note: subjects with planned surgical procedures to be conducted under local anesthesia may participate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm A: Testosterone cypionate or testosterone enanthate
Patients on BAT will receive testosterone cypionate or testosterone enanthate administered as an intramuscular injection. A dose of 400 mg of either agent will be injected intramuscularly (IM) every 28 days.
Depo-Testosterone Injection, for intramuscular injection, contains testosterone cypionate which is the oil-soluble of the androgenic hormone testosterone. Testosterone cypionate is a white or creamy white crystalline powder, odorless or nearly so and stable in air. Depo-Testosterone Injection is available in two strengths, 100 mg/mL and 200 mg/mL testosterone cypionate.
Other Names:
  • Depo-Testosterone Injection
Testosterone Enanthate Injection, for intramuscular injection, contains testosterone enanthate which is the oil-soluble ester of the androgenic hormone testosterone. Enanthate Injection is available as a colorless to pale yellow solution. Each mL contains 200 mg testosterone enanthate in sesame oil with 5 mg chlorobutanol as a preservative.
Other Names:
  • Delatestryl
Experimental: Arm B: Enzalutamide
Patients randomized to enzalutamide will be prescribed enzalutamide 40 mg tablets and instructed to take 4 tablets per day orally for 28 days/cycle.
Enzalutamide is a white crystalline non-hygroscopic solid. It is practically insoluble in water. Enzalutamide is provided as liquid-filled soft gelatin capsules for oral administration. Each capsule contains 40 mg of enzalutamide as a solution in caprylocaproyl polyoxylglycerides. The inactive ingredients are caprylocaproyl polyoxylglycerides, butylated hydroxyanisole, butylated hydroxytoluene, gelatin, sorbitol sorbitan solution, glycerin, purified water, titanium dioxide, and black iron oxide.
Other Names:
  • Xtandi

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression Free Survival as Measured by Number of Months Until Clinical or Radiographic Progression
Time Frame: up to 2 years

Time to clinical progression will be defined as months from randomization to any of the following (whichever occurs earlier):

  • Cancer pain requiring initiation of chronic administration of opiate analgesia (oral opiate use for ≥3 weeks; parenteral opiate use for ≥7 days. Patients with cancer pain requiring opiate analgesia for relief should also be assessed by the investigator for the need for initiating systemic chemotherapy or palliative radiation.
  • Development of a skeletal-related event (SRE): pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, or need for surgical intervention or radiation therapy to the bone.
  • Development of clinically significant symptoms due to loco-regional tumor progression (e.g. urinary obstruction) requiring surgical intervention or radiation therapy.
up to 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prostate-Specific Antigen Response Rate
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Number of participants achieving a Prostate-Specific Antigen decline ≥ 50% according to Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG2) criteria.
Up to 2 years
Objective Response Rate as Determined by RECIST
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Number of participants with partial (PR) or complete response (CR) as defined by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST), where CR is a disappearance of all target lesions and PR is ≥30% reduction in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.
Up to 2 years
Radiographic Progression
Time Frame: up to 2 years
Number of months until 20% increase in the sum of target lesions on CT scans.
up to 2 years
Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen Progression
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
Reported as number of months till Prostate-Specific Antigen increase of greater or equal to 50% according to Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG2) criteria.
Up to 2 years
Quality of Life as Assessed by the Positive Affect Score of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
Time Frame: up to 1 year
The Positive Affect Score is calculated by adding the scores on items 1, 3, 5, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, 17, and 19. Scores can range from 10 - 50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect.
up to 1 year
Quality of Life as Assessed by the Negative Affect Score of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
Time Frame: up to 1 year
The Negative Affect Score is calculated by adding the scores on items 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 11, 13, 15, 18, and 20. Scores can range from 10 - 50, with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect.
up to 1 year
Change in Quality of Life as Assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Questionnaire
Time Frame: up to 1 year
The IIEF assesses erectile function (EF), orgasmic function (OF), sexual desire (SD), intercourse satisfaction (IS), orgasmic satisfaction (OS). Each of domains are scored on a scale of 0 to 5 with a lower score indicating a bad quality sex life. The IIEF questionnaire has a total score that ranges from 5 to 25 with lower score indicating less erectile dysfunction. A positive change in the score reflects better outcome.
up to 1 year
Quality of Life as Assessed by Short Form 36
Time Frame: up to 1 year
All questions are scored on a scale from 0 to 100. The total score from all of the questions answered is divided by the total number of the questions answered yielding a global score from 0-100 with 100 representing the highest level of functioning possible.
up to 1 year
Quality of Life as Assessed by FACIT Fatigue Scale
Time Frame: up to 1 year
The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue has a score range of 0-52 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
up to 1 year
Pain Severity as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory
Time Frame: 1 year
Severity is calculated by adding the scores for questions 2, 3, 4 and 5 and then dividing by 4. This gives a severity score out of 10, high score indicates more severe pain.
1 year
Pain Interference as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory
Time Frame: 1 year
Interference is calculated by adding the scores for questions 8a, b, c, d, e, f and g and then dividing by 7. This gives an interference score out of 10, higher score indicates more pain interference.
1 year
Overall Survival
Time Frame: up to 3 years
Time until death for any reasons
up to 3 years
Progression Free Survival on Crossover Treatment
Time Frame: up to 2 years
Time from initiation of therapy to progression on crossover treatment
up to 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Samuel Denmeade, MD, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine - Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 26, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

February 21, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 10, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe