Peritonsillar Infiltration With Levobupivacaine for Posttonsillectomy Pain

December 22, 2014 updated by: Sanem Cakar Turhan, Ankara University

Peritonsillar Infiltration With Levobupivacaine for Relief of Posttonsillectomy Pain: Does Concentration Have Any Effect?

The investigators aimed to evaluate the effects of different concentrations of preincisional peritonsillar levobupivacaine (0.25% ve 0.5%) on postoperative pain and bleeding

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

72 ASA I-II patients between 3 and 12 years of age who scheduled to undergo tonsillectomy were enrolled in this randomized, prospective and placebo-controlled study. The indications for tonsillectomy were recurrent infections and tonsillar hypertrophy leading to obstructive symptoms.

The patients included to the study were randomly assigned to one of the 3 groups to receive different concentrations of levobupivacaine or saline.

The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rates (HR) of all patients were recorded during the whole anesthesia and surgical procedures. The duration of anesthesia and surgery were also recorded. Additional remifentanil 1 µgr kg-1 IV was administered to the patients if HR was increased by 25 % of the basal value.

During postoperative period, symptoms such as pain, fever and dysphagia, adverse affects such as nausea and vomiting and hemorrhage were evaluated. Pain was evaluated by FLACC (Faces, leg, activity, cry, consolability), FPRS (Faces pain rating scale) ve Wong-Baker facies scales at postoperative 0, 30 and 60 minutes and 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours. Total analgesic consumption during the postoperative period were recorded. If the patients had no complication, they were discharged at the postoperative 24th hour.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 3 and 12 who were scheduled to undergo tonsillectomy due to recurrent infections leading to obstructive symptoms
  • Patients aged 3 and 12 who were scheduled to undergo tonsillectomy due to tonsillar hypertrophy leading to obstructive symptoms.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypersensitivity to sevoflurane, benzodiazepine, fentanyl analogues, propofol and components, paracetamol, levobupivacaine
  • Presence of coagulation disorders and chronic diseases
  • Presence of regular use of analgesics
  • Presence of analgesic use within 24 hours prior to surgery
  • Presence of upper respiratory system infection
  • Inability to understand the pain scales, being unable to communicate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Group S
Preincisional bilateral peritonsillar infiltration of a total of 6 mL of saline

Peritonsillar infiltration with saline Additional remifentanil 1 µgr kg-1 IV was administered to the patients if HR was increased by 25 % of the basal value.

During postoperative period, symptoms such as pain, fever and dysphagia, adverse affects such as nausea and vomiting and hemorrhage were evaluated. Pain was evaluated by FLACC (Faces, leg, activity, cry, consolability), FPRS (Faces pain rating scale) ve Wong-Baker facies scales at postoperative 0, 30 and 60 minutes and 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours. Total analgesic consumption during the postoperative period were recorded. If the patients had no complication, they were discharged at the postoperative 24th hour.

Other Names:
  • Saline
Active Comparator: Group LL
Preincisional bilateral peritonsillar infiltration of levobupivacaine 0.25% (3 mL to each tonsil).

Peritonsillar infiltration with low-dose of levobupivacaine 0.25%. Additional remifentanil 1 µgr kg-1 IV was administered to the patients if HR was increased by 25 % of the basal value.

During postoperative period, symptoms such as pain, fever and dysphagia, adverse affects such as nausea and vomiting and hemorrhage were evaluated. Pain was evaluated by FLACC (Faces, leg, activity, cry, consolability), FPRS (Faces pain rating scale) ve Wong-Baker facies scales at postoperative 0, 30 and 60 minutes and 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours. Total analgesic consumption during the postoperative period were recorded. If the patients had no complication, they were discharged at the postoperative 24th hour.

Other Names:
  • Chirocaine 0.25%
Active Comparator: Group HL
Preincisional bilateral peritonsillar infiltration of levobupivacaine 0.5% (3 mL to each tonsil).

Peritonsillar infiltration with high dose of levobupivacaine 0.5%. Additional remifentanil 1 µgr kg-1 IV was administered to the patients if HR was increased by 25 % of the basal value.

During postoperative period, symptoms such as pain, fever and dysphagia, adverse affects such as nausea and vomiting and hemorrhage were evaluated. Pain was evaluated by FLACC (Faces, leg, activity, cry, consolability), FPRS (Faces pain rating scale) ve Wong-Baker facies scales at postoperative 0, 30 and 60 minutes and 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours. Total analgesic consumption during the postoperative period were recorded. If the patients had no complication, they were discharged at the postoperative 24th hour.

Other Names:
  • Chirocaine 0.5%

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in postoperative pain
Time Frame: 24 hours
pain assessed with FPRS (Faces pain rating scale)
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Presence of dysphagia
Time Frame: 24 hours
number of participants with dysphagia and without dysphagia.
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: K.Sanem Cakar Turhan, Specialist, Ankara University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

December 23, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 23, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Group S

3
Subscribe