Desarda Repair for Inguinal Hernia

December 30, 2014 updated by: Tamer Youssef Mohamed, Mansoura University

Desarda Versus Lichtenstein's Repair for Inguinal Hernia: a Comparative Study

Unlike Lichtenstein tension free repair for inguinal hernia, Desarda's repair was introduced as a pure tissue repair with no need for mesh. In other words; the complications which may arise from the use of a foreign body (mesh) will be avoided. The idea was to evaluate the efficacy of this new repair and compare it to the standard Lichtenstein repair.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

155

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • inguinal hernia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • recurrent inguinal hernia
  • giant inguinal hernia
  • mental disorder
  • refusal to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Lichtenstein tension free reair
mesh repair of inguinal hernia
a mesh is apllied on the posterior wall of the inguinal canal and sutured to the inguinal ligament below, to the internal oblique muscle above , and to rectus sheath medially.
Other Names:
  • pure synthetic repair
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Desarda's repair
non-mesh repair of inguinal hernia
the repair is done using a flap of the external oblique aponeurosis sutured to the inguinal ligament below and to the aponeurotic part of the internal oblique muscle above.
Other Names:
  • pure tissue reapir

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
number of patients with recurrence of inguinal hernia
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
VAS score for pain
Time Frame: one year
one year
number of patients develped postoperative complications
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 30, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 1, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 1, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MFM200956

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inguinal Hernia

Clinical Trials on Lichtenstein tension free reair

Subscribe