Lower or Standard Dose Regorafenib in Treating Patients With Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Regorafenib Dose Optimization Study (ReDOS): A Phase II Randomized Study of Lower Dose Regorafenib Compared to Standard Dose Regorafenib in Patients With Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC)

This randomized phase II trial studies how well lower-dose compared to standard dose regorafenib works in treating patients with colorectal cancer that has spread from the primary site (place where it started) to other places in the body and does not respond to treatment. Regorafenib may stop the growth of colorectal cancer by blocking the growth of new blood vessels necessary for tumor growth and by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It is not yet known whether lower-dose or standard dose regorafenib is more effective in treating patients with colorectal cancer. Clobetasol propionate is a steroid cream that is commonly used to treat a variety of skin conditions and may help prevent hand-foot skin reactions in patients receiving regorafenib.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Stage IV Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7; Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7; Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7; Rectal Adenocarcinoma; Colon Adenocarcinoma; Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7; Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7; Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7; Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Other: Pharmacological Study; Drug: Regorafenib; Drug: Clobetasol Propionate

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Evaluate the proportion of patients who complete 2 cycles of protocol treatment and initiate cycle 3 in arm A (pooled arm A1 and A2) and arm B (pooled arm B1 and B2).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Evaluate outcome measures for efficacy in each arm including progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS).

II. Compare between arms the cumulative dose and dose intensity received within the first two cycles.

III. Evaluate the proportion of patients in each arm that exhibit grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPES) and/or fatigue, and make comparisons between regorafenib dosing strategies and pre-emptive versus (vs.) reactive strategies to address PPES.

IV. Compare quality of life (QOL) between treatment arms (regorafenib dosing strategies and preemptive vs. reactive PPES strategies) as measured by the Hand and Foot Syndrome (HFS)14, Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), and Linear Analogue Self-Assessment (LASA) questionnaires.

TERTIARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Evaluate and compare trough minimum concentration (Cmin) pharmacokinetics (PK) during the first 2 treatment cycles for regorafenib and active metabolites M2, M5 between the low dose (dose escalation) and the standard dose cohorts, and correlate with toxicity profile.

II. Evaluate the correlation between PK parameters and tumor response/stable disease after the first two cycles.

III. Evaluate the correlation between PK parameters and PFS and OS. IV. Evaluate if trough (Cmin) concentrations are associated with patient-specific factors (such as ? but not limited to ? age and concomitant medications).

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 treatment arms.

ARM A1: Patients receive lower-dose regorafenib PO once daily (QD) on days 1-21 and pre-emptive clobetasol propionate given topically twice daily (BID) for 12 weeks, beginning on day 1 of regorafenib.

ARM A2: Patients receive lower-dose regorafenib PO as in Arm A1 and reactive clobetasol propionate given topically BID beginning on day 1 per physician discretion upon occurrence of PPES grade >= 1.

ARM B1: Patients receive standard dose regorafenib PO QD on days 1-21 and pre-emptive clobetasol propionate as in Arm A1.

ARM B2: Patients receive standard dose regorafenib PO as in Arm B1 and reactive clobetasol propionate as in Arm A2.

In all arms, courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 2-6 months.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 123
• Phase: Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Arizona
    • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85054
      • Mayo Clinic Hospital
    • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259
      • Mayo Clinic in Arizona
  • California
    • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
      • USC / Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
  • Illinois
    • Peoria, Illinois, United States, 61615
      • Illinois CancerCare-Peoria
  • Indiana
    • South Bend, Indiana, United States, 46628
      • Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium
  • Iowa
    • Sioux City, Iowa, United States, 51101
      • Siouxland Regional Cancer Center
  • Massachusetts
    • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
      • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • Minnesota
    • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
      • Mayo Clinic
    • Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States, 55416
      • Metro Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium
  • Missouri
    • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
      • Washington University School of Medicine
  • Nebraska
    • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68198
      • University of Nebraska Medical Center
    • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68106
      • Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium
  • New York
    • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14263
      • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
    • East Syracuse, New York, United States, 13057
      • Hematology Oncology Associates of Central New York-East Syracuse
  • North Carolina
    • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
      • Wake Forest University Health Sciences
  • Ohio
    • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
      • Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
    • Toledo, Ohio, United States, 43623
      • Toledo Clinic Cancer Centers-Toledo
  • Pennsylvania
    • Danville, Pennsylvania, United States, 17822
      • Geisinger Medical Center
  • Tennessee
    • Kingsport, Tennessee, United States, 37660
      • Wellmont Medical Associates Oncology and Hematology-Kingsport
  • Washington
    • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
      • University of Washington Medical Center
  • Wisconsin
    • Green Bay, Wisconsin, United States, 54301
      • Saint Vincent Hospital Cancer Center Green Bay
    • Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States, 54449
      • Marshfield Clinic

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Histological or cytological documentation of adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum
• Advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer with no curative options available and progression on previous standard therapy, including an EGFR inhibitor if KRAS wild-type
• Measurable or non-measurable disease
• Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0 or 1
• Life expectancy of >= 3 months
• Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1500/mm^3 (obtained =< 7 days prior to randomization)
• Platelet count > 100,000/mm^3 (obtained =< 7 days prior to randomization)
• Hemoglobin > 9.0 g/dL (obtained =< 7 days prior to randomization)
• Total bilirubin =< 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) (obtained =< 7 days prior to randomization)
• Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate amino-transferase (AST) =< 2.5 x ULN (=< 5 x ULN for subjects with liver involvement of their cancer) (obtained =< 7 days prior to randomization)
• Serum creatinine =< 1.5 x ULN (obtained =< 7 days prior to randomization)

• International normalized ratio (INR)/partial thromboplastin time (PTT) =< 1.5 x ULN (obtained =< 7 days prior to randomization)

  • NOTE: patients who are therapeutically treated with an agent such as warfarin or heparin will be allowed to participate provided that no prior evidence of underlying abnormality in coagulation parameters exists; close monitoring of at least weekly evaluations will be performed until INR/PTT is stable based on a measurement that is pre-dose as defined by the local standard of care
• Alkaline phosphatase limit =< 2.5 x ULN (=< 5 x ULN for patients with liver involvement of their cancer) (obtained =< 7 days prior to randomization)
• Negative serum pregnancy test done =< 7 days prior to randomization, for women of childbearing potential only; note: post-menopausal women (defined as no menses for at least 1 year) and surgically sterilized women are not required to undergo a pregnancy test; the definition of adequate contraception will be based on the judgment of the investigator
• Ability to complete questionnaire(s) by themselves or with assistance
• Provide informed written consent
• Willing to return to enrolling institution for follow-up (during the active monitoring phase of the study)
• Willing to provide blood samples for correlative research and banking purposes

Exclusion Criteria:

• Prior treatment with regorafenib
• Major surgical procedure, open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury =< 28 days prior to randomization
• Congestive heart failure > New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 2
• Unstable angina (angina symptoms at rest), new-onset angina (begun within the last 3 months) or myocardial infarction less than 6 months prior to randomization
• Cardiac arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy; Note: pace makers, beta blockers, or digoxin are permitted
• Uncontrolled hypertension; (systolic blood pressure > 140 mmHg or diastolic pressure > 90 mmHg despite optimal medical management)
• History of or current pheochromocytoma
• Arterial or venous thrombotic or embolic events such as cerebrovascular accident (including transient ischemic attacks), deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism =< 6 months prior to randomization
• Ongoing infection > grade 2 National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0
• Known history of chronic hepatitis B or C
• Patients with seizure disorder requiring medication
• Symptomatic metastatic brain or meningeal tumors unless the patient is > 6 months from definitive therapy, has a negative imaging study within 4 weeks of randomization and is clinically stable with respect to the tumor at the time of randomization; note: patient must not be undergoing acute steroid therapy or taper (chronic steroid therapy is acceptable provided that the dose is stable for one month prior to and following screening radiographic studies)
• History of organ allograft (including corneal transplant)
• Evidence or history of bleeding diathesis or any hemorrhage or bleeding event > CTCAE grade 3 =< 4 weeks prior to randomization
• Non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture
• Renal failure requiring hematological (hemo-) or peritoneal dialysis
• Dehydration CTCAE (version 4.0) grade >= 1
• Substance abuse, medical, psychological or social conditions that may interfere with the patient?s participation in the study or evaluation of the study results
• Known hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs, study drug classes, or excipients in the formulation
• Interstitial lung disease with ongoing signs and symptoms at the time of informed consent
• Persistent proteinuria of Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grade 3 or higher (>= 3.5 g/24 hours [hrs])
• Patients unable to swallow oral medications
• Any malabsorption condition
• Unresolved toxicity greater than CTCAE (version 4.0) grade 1 attributed to any prior therapy/procedure excluding alopecia and oxaliplatin induced neurotoxicity =< grade 2
• Albumin levels < 2.5 g/dl

• Any of the following:

  • Pregnant women
  • Nursing women

  • Men or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception

    • NOTE: men and women of childbearing potential must agree to use adequate contraception beginning at the signing of the informed consent form (ICF) until at least 3 months after the last dose of study drug; the definition of adequate contraception will be based on the judgment of the principal investigator or a designated associate
• Co-morbid systemic illnesses or other severe concurrent disease which, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this study or interfere significantly with the proper assessment of safety and toxicity of the prescribed regimens
• Immunocompromised patients and patients known to be human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive and currently receiving antiretroviral therapy; NOTE: patients known to be HIV positive, but without clinical evidence of an immunocompromised state, are eligible for this trial
• Receiving any other investigational agent which would be considered as a treatment for the primary neoplasm
• Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from colorectal cancer within 3 years prior to randomization EXCEPT for curatively treated cervical cancer in situ, non-melanoma skin cancer and superficial bladder tumors (Ta [non-invasive tumor], Tis [carcinoma in situ] and T1 [tumor invades lamina propria]); note: all cancer treatments for cancers that were distinct in a primary site other than colorectal must be completed at least 3 years prior to randomization (i.e., signature date of the informed consent form)
• Pleural effusion or ascites that causes respiratory compromise (>= CTCAE version 4.0 grade 2 dyspnea)
• Concurrent anti-cancer therapy =< 4 weeks from registration (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery, immunotherapy, biologic therapy, or tumor embolization)
• Current use of clobetasol propionate
• Use of any herbal remedy (e.g. St. John?s wort [Hypericum perforatum])
• Patients unable to ambulate or who have amputations or paralysis of any extremity
• History of contact dermatitis to clobetasol propionate or similarly fluorinated steroids or other steroids with the propionate ester

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

4

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm A1 (lower-dose regorafenib, pre-emptive clobetasol); Patients receive lower-dose regorafenib PO QD on days 1-21 and pre-emptive clobetasol propionate given topically BID for 12 weeks, beginning on day 1 of regorafenib.	Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Ancillary studies; Other Names: Quality of Life Assessment; Other: Pharmacological Study; Correlative studies; Drug: Regorafenib; Given PO; Other Names: BAY 73-4506; Stivarga; Drug: Clobetasol Propionate; Given topically; Other Names: Olux-E
Experimental: Arm A2 (lower-dose regorafenib, reactive clobetasol); Patients receive lower-dose regorafenib PO as in Arm A1 and reactive clobetasol propionate given topically BID beginning on day 1 per physician discretion upon occurrence of PPES grade >= 1.	Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Ancillary studies; Other Names: Quality of Life Assessment; Other: Pharmacological Study; Correlative studies; Drug: Regorafenib; Given PO; Other Names: BAY 73-4506; Stivarga; Drug: Clobetasol Propionate; Given topically; Other Names: Olux-E
Experimental: Arm B1 (standard dose regorafenib, pre-emptive clobetasol); Patients receive standard dose regorafenib PO QD on days 1-21 and pre-emptive clobetasol propionate as in Arm A1.	Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Ancillary studies; Other Names: Quality of Life Assessment; Other: Pharmacological Study; Correlative studies; Drug: Regorafenib; Given PO; Other Names: BAY 73-4506; Stivarga; Drug: Clobetasol Propionate; Given topically; Other Names: Olux-E
Experimental: Arm B2 (standard dose regorafenib, reactive clobetasol); Patients receive standard dose regorafenib PO as in Arm B1 and reactive clobetasol propionate as in Arm A2.	Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Ancillary studies; Other Names: Quality of Life Assessment; Other: Pharmacological Study; Correlative studies; Drug: Regorafenib; Given PO; Other Names: BAY 73-4506; Stivarga; Drug: Clobetasol Propionate; Given topically; Other Names: Olux-E

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Proportion of Patients in Each Arm Who Complete 2 Cycles of Protocol Treatment and Initiate Cycle 3	Fisher exact test will be used to detect a difference course 3 between arms (starting low dose [pooled arm A1 and A2] versus [vs.] standard dose [pooled arm B1 and B2]). The proportion of patients who complete 2 courses of protocol treatment and initiate course 3 will be computed by arm with its 95% confidence interval using exact method.	At 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Overall Survival (OS)	OS is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause and will be estimated with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and differences between regorafenib arms (A vs. B) tested using log-rank tests, though these analyses are not powered for formal non-inferiority assessments.	Time from randomization to death due to any cause, assessed up to 2 years
Progression Free Survival (PFS)	PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the earlier of disease progression or death due to any cause, where progressed disease (PD) is defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and will be estimated with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and differences between regorafenib arms (A vs. B) tested using log-rank tests, though these analyses are not powered for formal non-inferiority assessments.	Time from randomization to the earlier of disease progression or death due to any cause, where progressed disease (PD) is defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, assessed up to 2 years
Time to Progression (TTP)	TTP is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression, where PD is defined by RECIST 1.1 and will be estimated with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and differences between regorafenib arms (A vs. B) tested using log-rank tests, though these analyses are not powered for formal non-inferiority assessments.	Time from randomization to disease progression, where PD is defined by RECIST 1.1, assessed up to 2 years
Cumulative (Total) Dose of Regorafenib Received by Patients in the First Two Cycles	Will be summarized with descriptive statistics and compared between regorafenib arms (A vs. B).	Up to 8 weeks
Dose Intensity of Regorafenib Received by Patients in the First Two Cycles as Measured by the Percentage of Planned Dose Received	Dose intensity of regorafenib received by patients in the first two cycles as measured by the percentage (%) of planned dose received	Up to 8 weeks
Proportion of Patients Overall and Within Each Arm Experiencing Grade 3 or 4 Hand and Foot Syndrome (HFS) or Fatigue	Will be computed with 95% confidence intervals, and differences between regorafenib dosing strategies (pooled across HFS strategies) tested using a Fisher Exact test. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 HFS will also be descriptively compared between those receiving a pre-specified preemptive vs. reactive approach for hand and foot syndrome (pooled across dosing strategies), and tested using a Fisher Exact test.	Up to 2 years
Changes in Quality of Life (QOL) (According to the HFS14 Questionnaire)	Patients will be descriptively compared between treatment arms and between HFS treatment strategies (pre-emptive vs. reactive) according to self-reported outcomes given on the HFS14 questionnaire. Results from the course 1 and 2 HSF14 questionnaires will also be summarized descriptively as they relate to the pre-emptive versus reactive palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPES) strategies, with comparisons made within and between arms using the t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test as appropriate, as well as taking time-dependence into account.	Baseline to up to 8 weeks
Changes in QOL (According to the Linear Analogue Self-Assessment [LASA] Questionnaire)	Changes in QOL (according to the LASA questionnaire as measured by the overall QOL question) from baseline will be compared between the treatment arms using the Kruskal-Wallis test.	Baseline to 8 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Pharmacokinetics (PK) Parameters of Regorafenib Using Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry	After quantitation, the average trough concentration, calculated from all available data, will be calculated. This average trough concentration will be correlated with toxicity and efficacy endpoints. Further descriptive characteristics of the pharmacokinetics will also be calculated, an example includes (but is not limited to) within-patient variability in the trough concentrations pharmacokinetic parameters will also be calculated, both overall and within courses, as a ratio of the maximum:minimum value.	Baseline, prior to treatment, days 7, 14, and 21 prior to treatment (course 1), and days 1 and 21 prior to treatment (course 2)

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Academic and Community Cancer Research United
• Collaborators: National Cancer Institute (NCI)
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Academic and Community Cancer Research United

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Weinberg BA, Hartley ML, Salem ME. Precision Medicine in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Relevant Carcinogenic Pathways and Targets-PART 2: Approaches Beyond First-Line Therapy, and Novel Biologic Agents Under Investigation. Oncology (Williston Park). 2017 Jul 15;31(7):573-80.
• Bekaii-Saab TS, Ou FS, Ahn DH, Boland PM, Ciombor KK, Heying EN, Dockter TJ, Jacobs NL, Pasche BC, Cleary JM, Meyers JP, Desnoyers RJ, McCune JS, Pedersen K, Barzi A, Chiorean EG, Sloan J, Lacouture ME, Lenz HJ, Grothey A. Regorafenib dose-optimisation in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (ReDOS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Aug;20(8):1070-1082. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30272-4. Epub 2019 Jun 28.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): March 27, 2015
• Primary Completion (Actual): September 1, 2017
• Study Completion (Actual): March 2, 2023

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: February 16, 2015
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 20, 2015
• First Posted (Estimated): February 23, 2015

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): July 27, 2023
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 19, 2023
• Last Verified: September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Digestive System Diseases; Neoplasms by Histologic Type; Neoplasms; Neoplasms by Site; Carcinoma; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Digestive System Neoplasms; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Colonic Diseases; Intestinal Diseases; Intestinal Neoplasms; Rectal Diseases; Colorectal Neoplasms; Adenocarcinoma; Colonic Neoplasms; Physiological Effects of Drugs; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Glucocorticoids; Hormones; Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists; Clobetasol
• Other Study ID Numbers: RU021407I (Other Identifier: Academic and Community Cancer Research United); P30CA015083 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract); NCI-2015-00011 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: Yes
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No