Pharmacoeconomics and Related Patient Outcomes of Multi-dose Intravenous Acetaminophen (OFIRMEV)

September 10, 2019 updated by: Richard D Urman, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Pharmacoeconomics and Related Patient Outcomes of Multi-dose Intravenous Acetaminophen (OFIRMEV) in Patients Undergoing Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

To examine pharmacoeconomics of IV acetaminophen (Ofirmev). Specifically, to examine its potential to improve hospital efficiency and patient outcomes. The investigators compare the addition of IV acetaminophen versus placebo on postoperative anesthesia care unit recovery times, inpatient hospital length of stay (LOS), postoperative pain scores, consumption of opiates as rescue agents and side effects among patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Although IV acetaminophen has been studied in urologic surgery, it has not been studied specifically in prostatectomies, and therefore there are no outcomes or cost-effectiveness data currently available. In addition, the current trend is to perform prostatectomy with a robot-assisted laparoscopic technique to help minimize incision size, blood loss, postoperative pain, and speed up patient recovery. Current literature only includes the use of opioids in the perioperative setting for robot-assisted prostatectomy to treat pain, but only a small trial used oral acetaminophen as a measure for analgesia in RALP. In addition to the decreasing use of opioids in perioperative pain management, emphasis has been placed on reducing costs of healthcare. A major contributor to this issue is hospital length of stay (LOS) and there has been increased pressure on healthcare providers to decrease overall LOS. Several factors may contribute to hospital LOS, including hospital acquired infections, surgical recovery, wound care, other surgical and anesthesia-related complications, and importantly, inadequate pain control.

In this study we examine the impact of adding IV acetaminophen to the multimodal analgesic regimen for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Our hypothesis is that the addition of IV acetaminophen can improve postoperative recovery time, inpatient LOS, postoperative pain scores, and opioid consumption.

This study specifically addresses pharmacoeconomics of IV acetaminophen. The goal is to understand its potential to improve hospital efficiency and patient outcomes. The study compares the impact of the addition of IV acetaminophen versus a placebo on postoperative anesthesia care unit recovery times, inpatient LOS, postoperative pain scores, consumption of opiates as rescue agents and side effects in patients undergoing RALP.

The study is a 2-arm, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial comparing IV acetaminophen to a control (IV placebo). All patients in this study were scheduled to undergo RALP.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

86

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
  • ≥18 years old males
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1-4

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic opiate use
  • Liver disease (known history of hepatitis B or C, cirrhosis, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, history of alcoholism, liver function test results greater than 3 times upper limit of normal in the past 3 months)
  • Allergy/hypersensitivity to acetaminophen
  • Patients with baseline dementia
  • Chronic diathesis
  • Chronic kidney disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intravenous acetaminophen
Patient receives 1g intravenous acetaminophen after the incision
The patient was administered IV Ofirmev during anesthesia and then 3 more IV doses (1g each) every 6 hours up to 24 hrs.
Other Names:
  • Ofirmev
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Patient receives saline injection instead of the study drug
The patient was administered IV Placebo during anesthesia and then 3 more doses of IV Placebo every 6 hours up to 24 hrs.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post Anesthesia Care Unit Length of Stay
Time Frame: approximately 30-240 min
The amount of time patients stayed in the post-anesthesia care unit following anesthesia, before going to the inpatient ward.
approximately 30-240 min
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: 1-3 days
This outcome measure calculates the number of days the patient stayed in the hospital before being discharged home.
1-3 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Score
Time Frame: 0-24 hours after surgery

Pain scores were collected using the Visual Analog Scale. The scale range is 0 (no pain) to 10 (most pain).

Mean pain score over first 24 hours postoperatively was collected.

0-24 hours after surgery
Opioid Use
Time Frame: 0-24 hours
A measure of the amount of opioid study patients used postoperatively while recovering from surgery at the hospital
0-24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard Urman, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 17, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 23, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 11, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Acetaminophen (Ofirmev)

3
Subscribe