Computer-based Attention Training in Patients With Acquired Brain Injury

March 20, 2015 updated by: Jonas Lindeløv, University of Aarhus
Investigates computer based cognitive rehabilitation and training using the N-back task with a Visual Search task as an active control. The overall purpose is to provide (further) evidence about the efficacy (or lack of efficacy) of the N-back task and to find points of convergence and divergence between patients with acquired brain injury and non-impaired subjects.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

78

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • subjects should be able to do both task at level at the time of recruitment
  • Informed consent
  • (for brain injured patients) training must not interfere with treatment as usual.
  • (for brain injured patients) no symptoms which hinder testing and training. I.e. aphasia, deafness, tetraplegia etc.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patient N-back
Patients training the N-back task

The N-back task required patients to monitor a continuous sequence of stimuli (in this experiment audio and visual stimuli). Press a button if the current stimulus is the same as that shown N back in the sequence. N increases if performance is good and decreases if performance is poor.

Subjects train for 20 days, 12 blocks a day, 20+N trials per block. That is 240 blocks in total. A minimum of 10 blocks per day counts as a successfully trained day.

Active Comparator: Patient Visual Search
Patients training the Visual-Search task

The Visual Search task consists of a NxN array of shapes. Press the button if a certain target stimulus is present in this array. N increases if performance is good and decreases if performance is poor.

Subjects train for 20 days, 12 blocks a day, 20+N trials per block. That is 240 blocks in total. A minimum of 10 blocks per day counts as a successfully trained day.

Experimental: Non-impaired N-back
Non-impaired training the N-back task

The N-back task required patients to monitor a continuous sequence of stimuli (in this experiment audio and visual stimuli). Press a button if the current stimulus is the same as that shown N back in the sequence. N increases if performance is good and decreases if performance is poor.

Subjects train for 20 days, 12 blocks a day, 20+N trials per block. That is 240 blocks in total. A minimum of 10 blocks per day counts as a successfully trained day.

Active Comparator: Non-impaired Visual Search
Non-impaired training the Visual-Search task

The Visual Search task consists of a NxN array of shapes. Press the button if a certain target stimulus is present in this array. N increases if performance is good and decreases if performance is poor.

Subjects train for 20 days, 12 blocks a day, 20+N trials per block. That is 240 blocks in total. A minimum of 10 blocks per day counts as a successfully trained day.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline Raven's advanced progressive matrices at the end of training
Time Frame: within five days after 20 full training days has been completed. Expected 3-6 weeks after baseline.
within five days after 20 full training days has been completed. Expected 3-6 weeks after baseline.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline WAIS-III Working Memory Index at the end of training
Time Frame: within five days after 20 full training days has been completed. Expected 3-6 weeks after baseline.
within five days after 20 full training days has been completed. Expected 3-6 weeks after baseline.
Change from baseline WAIS-III Processing Speed Index at the end of training
Time Frame: within five days after 20 full training days has been completed. Expected 3-6 weeks after baseline.
within five days after 20 full training days has been completed. Expected 3-6 weeks after baseline.
Change from baseline Operation Span at the end of training
Time Frame: within five days after 20 full training days has been completed. Expected 3-6 weeks after baseline.
within five days after 20 full training days has been completed. Expected 3-6 weeks after baseline.
Change from baseline Stroop color-text interference at the end of training
Time Frame: within five days after 20 full training days has been completed. Expected 3-6 weeks after baseline.
within five days after 20 full training days has been completed. Expected 3-6 weeks after baseline.
Change from baseline AMPS at the end of training
Time Frame: within five days after 20 full training days has been completed. Expected 3-6 weeks after baseline.
within five days after 20 full training days has been completed. Expected 3-6 weeks after baseline.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jonas Lindeløv, M.Sc., Hammel Neurocenter

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 26, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 26, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Injuries

Clinical Trials on N-back

Subscribe