Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Lumason/SonoVue in Subjects Undergoing Pharmacologic Stress BR1-141

June 2, 2021 updated by: Bracco Diagnostics, Inc

A Prospective Multicenter Phase III Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Lumason™/SonoVue® in Subjects Undergoing Pharmacologic Stress Echocardiography With Dobutamine for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of Lumason-enhanced dobutamine stress echo (CE-DSE) in subjects having a suboptimal left ventricular endocardial border delineation (LV EBD) at rest and who were scheduled for coronary angiography.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of Lumason at improving the visualization of the LV EBD during pharmacologic stress echocardiography examinations and for detection or exclusion of the coronary artery disease (CAD). The study population consisted of adult subjects referred for pharmacological stress echocardiography and with suboptimal image quality during unenhanced ultrasound imaging at rest who had known or suspected CAD. Subjects enrolled in the study represented subjects who could benefit most from contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) stress echocardiography.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

175

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G2B7
        • Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta Hospital
      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Medizinische Klinik m.S. Kardiologie und Angiologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
      • Lünen, Germany, 44534
        • Klinikum Lünen, St. Marien-Hospital GmbH
      • Mainz, Germany, 55131
        • Universitätsmedizin Mainz
      • Munich, Germany, 81379
        • Kardiologie Klinik Dr. Müller GmbH, Peter Osypka Heart Center
      • Parma, Italy, 43126
        • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Parma
      • Rome, Italy, 00161
        • Azienda Policlinico Umberto I Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza
    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85724
        • Sarver Heart Center, University of Arizona
    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92037
        • University of California San Diego
      • West Hills, California, United States, 91037
        • Interventional Cardiology Medical Group, Inc.
    • Delaware
      • Newark, Delaware, United States, 19713
        • Cardiology Physicians, PA
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46250
        • Community Heart and Vascular Community Hospital East
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64111
        • St. Luke's Mid-America Heart Institute
      • North Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64116
        • North Kansas City Hospital
    • New Jersey
      • Morristown, New Jersey, United States, 07960
        • Morristown Medical Center
      • Teaneck, New Jersey, United States, 07666
        • The Institute for Clinical Research Holy Name Medical Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mount Sinai Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provided written Informed Consent and was willing to comply with protocol requirements;
  • Was at least 18 years of age;
  • Had suspected or known CAD and was scheduled to undergo coronary angiography within 6 months after the LUMASON DSE.
  • Had undergone a previous echocardiography prior to enrollment; resulting in suboptimal unenhanced images at rest, defined as ≥ 2 suboptimal adjacent segments in any apical view.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Was a pregnant or lactating female. Excluded the possibility of pregnancy by testing on site at the institution (serum or urine βHCG) within 24 hours prior to the start of LUMASON administration(s), by surgical history (e.g., tubal ligation or hysterectomy), post menopausal with a minimum 1 year without menses;
  • Had any known hypersensitivity to 1 or more ingredients of LUMASON (sulfur hexafluoride or to any components of LUMASON);
  • Had any known hypersensitivity to dobutamine;
  • Had an ongoing or recent (within the last 30 days) acute myocardial infarction;
  • Had known right-to-left, bidirectional or transient cardiac shunt (ruled out with agitated saline study performed before administration of LUMASON);
  • Had electrolyte (especially potassium and magnesium) abnormalities;
  • Had unstable pulmonary and/or systemic hemodynamic conditions e.g.:
  • decompensated or inadequately controlled congestive heart failure (NYHA Class IV);
  • hypovolemia;
  • uncontrolled hypertension, i.e. resting systolic blood pressure >200 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >110 mmHg;
  • unstable angina;
  • acute coronary syndrome;
  • aortic dissection;
  • acute pericarditis,
  • myocarditis, or endocarditis;
  • stenosis of the main left coronary artery;
  • hemodynamically significant outflow obstruction of the left ventricle, including hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy;
  • hemodynamically significant cardiac valvular defect;
  • acute pulmonary embolism;
  • Had uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias;
  • Had significant disturbance in conduction;
  • Had hypertrophic subaortic stenosis;
  • Had an acute illness (e.g., infections, hyperthyroidism, or severe anemia);
  • Was previously entered into this study or received an investigational compound within 30 days before admission into this study;
  • Had been treated with any other contrast agent either intravascularly or orally within 48 hours of the first LUMASON administration;
  • Had any medical condition or other circumstances which would significantly decrease the chances of obtaining reliable data, achieving study objectives, or completing the study and/or postdose follow-up examinations;

In addition, due to the use of Atropine in subjects who had not reached targeted heart rate with peak dobutamine infusion, subjects with the following were excluded:

  • Glaucoma;
  • Pyloric stenosis;
  • Prostatic hypertrophy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lumason
Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres) 2 mL IV injection
Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride-type A microspheres) an ultrasound contrast agent was administered as 2 single 2-mL IV injections during rest and stress echocardiography
Other Names:
  • SonoVue

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity and Specificity for Detection or Exclusion of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
Time Frame: Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography were performed

The diagnostic performance of the echocardiographic images was compared to the truth standard to determine sensitivity and specificity. A diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) was determined for both the echo images and truth standard (positive diagnosis for CAD is defined as >/= 50% stenosis of any vessel on coronary angiography or if no coronary angiography is performed the occurence of a cardiac event based on clinical information for up to 6 months post dose; otherwise the diagnosis is negative).

Results for sensitivity and specificity are reflected based on difference between contrast enhanced stress echo and unenhanced stress echo. Results for analysis of data based on majority assessment from the three off-site blinded readers are presented.

Sensitivity and specificity are the percentages of correctly diagnosed subjects by stress echo over the total positive and negative subjects according to the truth standard respectively.

Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography were performed
Reader-Specific Percentages of Participants Identified as Having a Critical Shift From Suboptimal to Optimal Echocardiographic Images
Time Frame: Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography was performed
The percentage of subjects with suboptimal images (defined as >= 2 adjacent segments with inadequate left ventricular endocardial border delineation (LV EBD) in any of the 3 apical views) at unenhanced stress echo converted to adequate (reduction of suboptimal segments in any of the 3 apical views) at contrast-enhanced stress echo
Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography was performed

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Total LV EBD
Time Frame: Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography was performed
Measured as the change in the total LV EBD score based on the 17 segments, from peak stress unenhanced vs. peak stress contrast-enhanced. Total LV EBD score ranges from 0 to 34 and higher score is better outcome.
Participants were followed until they had coronary angiography or up to 6 months post dose to collect clinical information on cardiac events if no coronary angiography was performed
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: up to 72 hours post dose
To obtain safety data in subjects administered Lumason during echocardiography
up to 72 hours post dose

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 24, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 7, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 25, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

August 13, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe