Angioplasty + SBCV vs. Angioplasty Alone for Femoropopliteal Artery Stenosis (SHIELD)

February 8, 2017 updated by: Symic Vascular

A Multicenter, Parallel, Blinded, Randomized Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Balloon Angioplasty Plus Intraluminal SBCV To Balloon Angioplasty Alone for Treatment of Stenosis or Occlusion Within the Femoropopliteal Artery

The purpose of this study is to compare balloon angioplasty plus SBCV against balloon angioplasty alone for treatment of stenosis within the femoropopliteal artery.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This first-in-human study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a novel adjunctive therapy, SBCV, used with balloon angioplasty as compared to balloon angioplasty plus a control agent (saline) when used for the treatment of stenosis within the femoropopliteal artery. Effectiveness will be measured by late lumen loss at 24 weeks post treatment as evaluated by an independent, blinded core lab.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Melbourne, New South Wales, Australia, 2050
        • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2065
        • Royal North Shore Hospital
    • Queensland
      • Southport, Queensland, Australia, 4215
        • Gold Coast University Hospital
    • South Australia
      • Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5043
        • Flinders Medical Center
    • Victoria
      • Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia, 3084
        • Austin Health
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3181
        • The Alfred Hospital
    • Western Australia
      • Perth, Western Australia, Australia, 6009
        • Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
      • Auckland, New Zealand, 1023
        • Auckland City Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Scheduled for balloon angioplasty for stenosis of femoropopliteal lesion(s)
  • Rutherford Clinical Category 1-4 (claudication or critical limb ischemia)
  • Lesions are ≥70% stenosis by visual estimate
  • A patent inflow artery free from significant lesion
  • At least one patent native outflow artery to the ankle

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of haemorrhagic stroke within 3 months of screening
  • History of myocardial infarction, thrombolysis or angina within 2 weeks of screening
  • Renal failure or chronic kidney disease
  • Severe calcification that renders the lesion undilatable

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SBCV
SBCV is administered to the site immediately post balloon dilation.
SBCV is a single use, sterile product that acts as a localized physical barrier at the vascular wall.
Placebo Comparator: Control
Saline is used as a control and is delivered immediately post balloon dilation.
Saline is used as a control.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events
Time Frame: through 24 weeks

The composite of no all-cause perioperative (≤30 day) mortality and none of the following events at 24 weeks following treatment:

  • Index limb amputation (above or below the ankle)
  • Index limb re-intervention
  • Index-limb-related death
through 24 weeks
Late Lumen Loss
Time Frame: 24 weeks
LLL is defined as the difference between the minimum lumen diameter (MLD) immediately post-primary procedure and the MLD at follow-up as measured by an independent, blinded core lab.
24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 1, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 9, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Arterial Disease

3
Subscribe