- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02621710
Goal Achievement and Patient Satisfaction in Benign Hysterectomy
October 27, 2017 updated by: Graham Chapman, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
This study evaluates patient goal achievement and satisfaction in benign hysterectomy.
Patient's will state their goals prior to undergoing benign hysterectomy, and will receive a follow-up questionnaire 3 months post-operatively evaluating their perception of goal achievement and overall satisfaction.
Goal achievement and satisfaction will be evaluated for association with surgical indication, surgical approach (minimally invasive vs abdominal surgery), and demographic information.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
57
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
- University Hospitals
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Patients undergoing benign hysterectomy for benign indications in a scheduled manner
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient undergoing hysterectomy for benign indication
- Age 18 or greater
- English speaking
- Access to communication via telephone
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient undergoing hysterectomy for malignant or pre-malignant condition
- Non-english speaking patient
- Patient without telephone access
- Patient undergoing emergent or unplanned hysterectomy
- Vulnerable populations
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Minimally invasive hysterectomy
Patients undergoing scheduled minimally invasive hysterectomy (vaginal, laparoscopic, robotic) for benign condition
|
|
Abdominal hysterectomy
Patients undergoing scheduled abdominal hysterectomy for benign condition
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Goal achievement score of 4 or 5
Time Frame: 3 months post-operatively
|
Patients will state their goals prior to surgery, then at the three months post-operatively will rank if their goals were met on a 1-5 likert scale (1=strongly disagree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree).
Goals are considered achieved with a likert score of 4 or 5.
|
3 months post-operatively
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percent of patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 3 months post-operatively
|
At three months post-operatively, patients will state how satisfied they are with their hysterectomy experience, from 0 to 100%.
|
3 months post-operatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sangeeta Mahajan, MD, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444: choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1156-1158. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c33c72.
- Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, van Voorst S, Mol BW, Kluivers KB. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;(3):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4.
- Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, FitzGerald MP, Shott S, Brubaker L. Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Dec;189(6):1551-7; discussion 1557-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(03)00932-3.
- Pitter MC, Simmonds C, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Hubert HB. The impact of different surgical modalities for hysterectomy on satisfaction and patient reported outcomes. Interact J Med Res. 2014 Jul 17;3(3):e11. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.3160.
- Pilzek AL, Raker CA, Sung VW. Are patients' personal goals achieved after pelvic reconstructive surgery? Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Mar;25(3):347-50. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2222-8. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
- Mamik MM, Rogers RG, Qualls CR, Komesu YM. Goal attainment after treatment in patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;209(5):488.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.011. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
- Hullfish KL, Bovbjerg VE, Gibson J, Steers WD. Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: what is success, and is it achieved? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jul;187(1):88-92. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.124838.
- Mahajan ST, Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, Shott S, Brubaker L. Patient-centered surgical outcomes: the impact of goal achievement and urge incontinence on patient satisfaction one year after surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Mar;194(3):722-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.043.
- Martino MA, Berger EA, McFetridge JT, Shubella J, Gosciniak G, Wejkszner T, Kainz GF, Patriarco J, Thomas MB, Boulay R. A comparison of quality outcome measures in patients having a hysterectomy for benign disease: robotic vs. non-robotic approaches. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):389-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.10.008. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
- Warren L, Ladapo JA, Borah BJ, Gunnarsson CL. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):581-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.06.018.
- Wright KN, Jonsdottir GM, Jorgensen S, Shah N, Einarsson JI. Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies. JSLS. 2012 Oct-Dec;16(4):519-24. doi: 10.4293/108680812X13462882736736.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
December 1, 2015
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 1, 2017
Study Completion (Actual)
March 1, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 28, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 1, 2015
First Posted (Estimate)
December 3, 2015
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 31, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 27, 2017
Last Verified
October 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 053161
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Patient Satisfaction
-
Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research...Enrolling by invitationSatisfaction, Patient | SatisfactionPakistan
-
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterTerminated
-
Universitair Ziekenhuis BrusselUnknownPatient Satisfaction | Patient PreferenceBelgium
-
HaEmek Medical Center, IsraelUnknownPatient Satisfaction | Patient Compliance
-
Acibadem UniversityCompletedPatient Satisfaction | Patient Relations, NurseTurkey
-
University of AarhusAarhus University HospitalCompletedPatient Satisfaction | Patient-Centered CareDenmark
-
Samsun UniversityRecruiting
-
University of UtahActive, not recruitingPatient SatisfactionUnited States
-
Fatma mahannaCompleted
-
Medical University of ViennaCompletedPatient SatisfactionAustria
Clinical Trials on Questionnaire 3 months post-operatively
-
University of UtahActive, not recruiting
-
University of PittsburghTu Du HospitalCompleted
-
Washington University School of MedicineVarian Medical SystemsCompletedNon-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer | Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell-LungUnited States
-
International Medical UniversityKotra Pharma (M) Sdn BhdCompletedCancer of Breast | Cancer ColonMalaysia
-
University Hospital, LinkoepingActive, not recruitingHydrocephalus, Normal Pressure | Ventriculomegaly, Cerebral | Shunt; Complications | Hydrocephalus AcquiredSweden
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompleted
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)Active, not recruiting
-
The Royal Bournemouth HospitalCompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Hip | Hip Replacement, TotalUnited Kingdom
-
NYU Langone HealthAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)CompletedCardiovascular Disease | High Blood PressureUnited States
-
Duke UniversityRecruitingLumbar Spondylosis | Lumbar Spine Degeneration | Lumbar Spine InstabilityUnited States