To Determine the Validity of the ACT in an Adolescent Population With Persistent Asthma (ACT2)

To Determine the Measurement Properties of the ACT in an Adolescent Population With Persistent Asthma Followed at a Subspecialty Clinic.

To determine the measurement profiles of the asthma control test (ACT) in an adolescent population with persistent asthma.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Asthma is the most common chronic illness of childhood, and adolescents represent a group that is typically difficult to engage in self-management strategies. Adolescent asthmatics tend to have poor perception of symptoms and experience a higher rate of asthma deaths compared to younger children. Studies have shown that perceived severity of asthma symptoms is related to self-management in adolescents, who were less likely to receive appropriate treatment for asthma exacerbation's. This poor perception of asthma control is likely one cause of the disproportionate asthma mortality rates seen in adolescent patients.

Because asthma control is now the focus of asthma care, assessment of control is the critical step in appropriate management. The two domains of asthma control, impairment and risk, evaluate the role asthma plays in a patient's quality of life and functional capacity on an ongoing basis and the risk their asthma presents for future adverse events. Although the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidelines contain a rubric for asthma control based on these domains, thus representing the "gold standard" for asthma care, their utilization may be time-consuming and cumbersome to implement in primary care offices, and primary care providers may be unfamiliar with their use. For primary care practices following adolescent patients, it remains imperative that the tools being used to gauge asthma control be evaluated and validated in this at-risk population.

At this time, there are approximately 17 questionnaires available for use in the assessment of asthma control, although most are not well validated. Of these, the most widely validated and most commonly used instrument is the Asthma Control Test (ACT). The ACT is a self-administered questionnaire intended to assess the impairment domain over the past four weeks and is completed by patients starting at age 12 years. The ACT has five questions with an overall best score of 25. For primarily adult Caucasian populations, the ACT has been found to be a valid, reliable, and responsive instrument of asthma control, and cut-offs for controlled and not well controlled asthma (< 19) as well as minimal clinically important (MIC) differences (3 points) have been identified. The measurement properties of validity, reliability, and responsiveness are critical to the usefulness of any questionnaire in both clinical and research settings. However, measurement properties of the ACT are lacking in the adolescent asthma population.The landmark validation study for the ACT by Schatz et al was comprised of a large sample size of over 300 patients that showed that a cut-off score of 19 as distinguishing well-controlled versus not well-controlled asthmatics. However, the mean age was 35 for that study population, and concerns have been raised as to whether this cut-off is appropriate for adolescents in general. Recent studies examining use of the ACT in Caucasian and Hispanic adolescent populations have found higher optimal cut points to distinguish control classifications.

Lung function measures are included in the rubric of assessing asthma control by the NAEPP (National Asthma Education and Prevention Program). Per these recommendations, spirometry should be available to physicians caring for asthma patients and used with initiation of treatment, change in asthma control, and every one to two years. While sub-specialists often have access to spirometry, office-based spirometry is time-consuming, requires technical ability and staff training, equipment maintenance and calibration, and is not always available or feasible for use in primary care physician offices. Because spirometry may be of limited accessibility to primary care providers, questionnaires are quickly taking a leading role in asthma management. Studies of adolescent asthmatics reveal poor perception of asthma control leading to under-reporting of asthma symptoms and thus under-treatment of exacerbation's. This type of under-reporting reflects a false level of asthma control when queried by the ACT and leads to inappropriate medical management when spirometry is not utilized.

As exploratory endpoints, we will obtain fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measurements shortly after spirometry is performed. Elevated FeNO indicates eosinophilic airway inflammation and assists in assigning the correct asthma phenotype, which can have implications for asthma management. We will also obtain nasal epithelial lining fluid (ELF) for collection of nasal cytokines and chemokines. This information is useful for expanding our current understanding of the inflammatory mediators involved in asthma-associated airway inflammation.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

37

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599-7310
        • UNC Center for Environmental Medicine, Asthma and Lung Biology
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27607
        • NC Children's Specialty Clinic, 4414 Lake Boone Trail, Suite 505

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Children ages 12-18 with a physician diagnosis of persistent asthma living in a defined geographical area

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Physician diagnosis of persistent asthma
  • Current treatment with appropriate therapy for persistent asthma symptoms per the NHLBI guidelines including daily controller medication with at least low dose inhaled corticosteroids
  • Must live within convenient driving distance of the North Carolina Children's Specialty Clinic in Raleigh North Carolina or the EPA Human Studies Facility on University of North Carolina Campus in Chapel Hill North Carolina.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to perform spirometry
  • Other medical history or underlying health problems that would preclude participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cohen's kappa
Time Frame: Baseline visit
To determine the agreement of the ACT score at the standard cutpoint of >19 with physician assessment of control using Cohen's kappa.
Baseline visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of ACT Questionnaire
Time Frame: follow-up visit (six weeks)
A receiver-operating curve will be used to determine the best ACT cutpoint for assessment of control in this population. A logistic regression model will be used with 'control by physician' as the dependent variable and 'ACT score' as the independent variable. The model will include adjustment for repeated measures (baseline and 6 week visit).
follow-up visit (six weeks)
Specificity of ACT Questionnaire
Time Frame: follow-up visit (six weeks)
A receiver-operating curve will be used to determine the best ACT cutpoint for assessment of control in this population. A logistic regression model will be used with 'control by physician' as the dependent variable and 'ACT score' as the independent variable. The model will include adjustment for repeated measures (baseline and 6 week visit).
follow-up visit (six weeks)
Cohen's kappa
Time Frame: follow-up visit (six weeks)
To determine the agreement of the ACT score at the standard cutpoint of >19 with physician assessment of control using Cohen's kappa.
follow-up visit (six weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Allison Burbank, MD, Fellow
  • Study Director: Michelle Hernandez, MD, Assistant professor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 10, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 27, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 25, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on Validation of Asthma Control Questionnaire

3
Subscribe