BeSmooth Study, Investigating the BeSmooth Peripheral Stent System for the Treatment of Iliac Lesions (BeSmooth)

January 11, 2017 updated by: Flanders Medical Research Program

BeSmooth Study, a Physician-initiated PMCF Trial Investigating the BeSmooth Peripheral Stent System for the Treatment of Iliac Lesions

A Physician initiated PMCF Trial Investigating the BeSmooth Peripheral Stent System for the treatment of Iliac Lesions.

The objective of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of the BeSmooth Peripheral Stent System in clinical settings post CE-certification when used according to the indications of the IFU.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aalst, Belgium, 9300
        • OLV Hospital
      • Bonheiden, Belgium, 2820
        • Imelda Hospital Bonheiden
      • Dendermonde, Belgium, 9200
        • AZ Sint-Blasius
      • Tienen, Belgium, 3300
        • Heilig Hart Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Corresponding to the CE-mark indications/contra-indications and according to the current medical guidelines for minimally invasive peripheral interventions.
  2. Patient presenting with a stenotic or occlusive lesion at the iliac arteries suitable for stenting (on indication for primary stenting, based on the discretion of the investigator)
  3. Patient presenting a score from 2 to 5 following Rutherford classification
  4. Patient is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluations at the specified times for the duration of the study
  5. Patient is >18 years old
  6. Patient (or their legal representative) understands the nature of the procedure and provides written informed consent, prior to enrolment in the study
  7. Patient is eligible for treatment with the BeGraft Peripheral Stent Graft System (Bentley InnoMed)
  8. The target lesion is either a modified TASC-II class A, B, C or D lesion with one of the listed specifications:

    • Type A lesions

      • Unilateral or bilateral stenoses of the Common Iliac Artery
      • Unilateral or bilateral single short (≤3 cm) stenosis of the External Iliac Artery
    • Type B lesions

      • Unilateral Common Iliac Artery occlusion
      • Single or multiple stenosis totaling 3-10 cm involving the External Iliac Artery not extending into the Common Femoral Artery
      • Unilateral External Iliac Artery occlusion not involving the origins of Internal Iliac Artery or Common Iliac Artery
    • Type C lesions

      • Bilateral Common Iliac Artery occlusions
      • Bilateral External Iliac Artery stenoses 3-10 cm long not extending into the Common Femoral Artery
  9. The target lesion has angiographic evidence of stenosis or restenosis > 50% or occlusion which can be passed with standard guidewire manipulation
  10. There is angiographic evidence of a patent Common an Deep Femoral Artery

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. PTA is technically not possible (not feasible to access the lesion or a defect with the guidewire or balloon catheter)
  2. Presence of an aneurysm immediately adjacent to the site of stent implantation
  3. Stenosis distal to the site of stent implantation
  4. Lesions in or adjacent to essential collaterals(s)
  5. Lesions in locations subject to external compression
  6. Heavily calcified lesions resistant to PTA
  7. Patients with diffuse distal disease resulting in poor stent outflow
  8. Patients with a history of coagulation disorders
  9. Patients with aspirin allergy or bleeding complications and patients unable or unwilling to tolerate anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy and/or non-responders to anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy
  10. Fresh thrombus formation
  11. Patients with known hypersensitivity to the stent material(L605)
  12. The target lesion is either a modified TASC-II class B or D lesion with aortic or common femoral lesion involvement:

    • Type B lesions

      -Short (≤3 cm) stenosis of infrarenal aorta

    • Type C lesions

      • Unilateral External Iliac Artery stenosis extending into the Common Femoral Artery
      • Unilateral External Iliac Artery occlusion that involves the origins of the Internal Iliac and/or Common Femoral Artery
      • Heavily calcified unilateral External Iliac Artery occlusion with or without involvement of origins of the Internal Iliac and/or Common Femoral Artery
    • Type D lesions

      • Infra-renal aortoiliac occlusion
      • Iliac stenoses in patients with an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) requiring treatment and not amenable to endograft placement or other lesions requiring open aortic or iliac surgery
      • Diffuse multiple stenoses involving the unilateral Common Iliac, External Iliac and Common Femoral Artery
      • Unilateral occlusions of both Common Iliac and External Iliac Artery
      • Diffuse disease involving the aorta and both iliac arteries requiring treatment
      • Bilateral occlusions of the External Iliac Artery
  13. Previously implanted stent(s) at the same lesion site
  14. Reference segment diameter is not suitable for the available stent design
  15. Untreatable lesion located at the distal outflow arteries
  16. Use of alternative therapy (e.g. atherectomy, cutting balloon, laser, radiation therapy) as part of the index procedure
  17. Patients refusing treatment
  18. Patients for whom antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulants or thrombolytic drugs are contraindicated
  19. Patients who exhibit persistent acute intraluminal thrombus of the proposed lesion site
  20. Perforation at the angioplasty site evidenced by extravasation of contrast medium
  21. Patients with a history of prior life-threatening contrast medium reaction
  22. Patients with uncorrected bleeding disorders
  23. Female patient with child bearing potential not taking adequate contraceptives or currently breastfeeding
  24. Life expectancy of less than twelve months
  25. Any planned surgical intervention/procedure within 30 days of the study procedure
  26. Any patient considered to be hemodynamically unstable at onset of procedure
  27. Patient is currently participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not completed the entire follow up period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: BeSmooth Peripheral Stent system
Patients treated with the BeSmooth Peripheral Stent System
patients treated with the BeSmooth Peripheral Stent System

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Patency at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
defined as a target lesion without a hemodynamically significant stenosis on duplex ultrasound (>50%, systolic velocity ratio no greater than 2.4) and without Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) within 12 months.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Patency at 1 & 6 month
Time Frame: 1 and 6 months
Patients that present without a hemodynamically significant stenosis at the target area on duplex ultrasound (>50%, systolic velocity ratio no greater than 2.4) and without prior TLR are defined as being primary patent at the given follow-up.
1 and 6 months
Stent Occlusion Rate at 1,6 and 12-month follow-up
Time Frame: up to 12 months
100% (re)occlusion rate within the study stent
up to 12 months
ABI at 1,6 and 12-month follow-up, compared with baseline
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Ankle-Brachial index measurements at 1,6 and 12-month FU visit, compared with measurements at baseline (pre operatively)
up to 12 months
Amputation rate at 1,6 and 12-month follow-up
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Amputation rate at 1-, 6- and 12-month follow-up, defined as any amputation above the knee.
up to 12 months
Performance success rate at baseline, defined as restoration of blood flow
Time Frame: during the index study procedure
Device success, restoration of blood flow during index procedure
during the index study procedure
In-stent restenosis rate
Time Frame: up to 12 months
restenosis rate within the study stent
up to 12 months
Freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Freedom from Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR), defined as freedom from a repeat intervention to maintain or re-establish patency within the region of the treated arterial vessel plus 5mm proximal and distal to the treated lesion edge.
up to 12 months
Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), defined according to ISO 14155:2011 as any clinical event that is fatal, life-threatening, or judged to be severe by the investigator; resulted in persistent or significant disability; necessitated surgical or percutaneous intervention; or required prolonged hospitalization.
up to 12 months
Technical success
Time Frame: during the index study procedure
The ability to achieve final residual angiographic stenosis no greater than 30%
during the index study procedure
Clinical success at follow-up is defined as an improvement of Rutherford Classification at 1-,6- and 12-month follow-up
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Clinical success at follow-up is defined as an improvement of Rutherford classification at 1-, 6- and 12-month follow-up of one class or more as compared to the pre-procedure Rutherford classification
up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Koen Deloose, MD, Flanders Medical Research Program

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

February 24, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 12, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Arterial Disease

Clinical Trials on BeSmooth peripheral stent

Subscribe