Efficacy and Safety Evaluation Study of Neuramis® Deep Lidocaine in Correction of Nasolabial Fold

April 21, 2016 updated by: Medy-Tox

A Randomized, Multi-center, Double Blind, Intra-Individual Controlled, Active-controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Injection With Neuramis® Deep Lidocaine as Compared to Restylane® PERLANE-L in Correction of Nasolabial Fold

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the study medical device, Neuramis® Deep Lidocaine and the control medical device, Restylane® PERLANE-L in correction of nasolabial folds

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a multi-center, double blind, intra-individual controlled, active-controlled clinical trial.

Efficacy and Safety are evaluated at the appointed time at subject visit clinical site after Injecting medical device.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Dongdaemun-gu
      • Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Korea, Republic of, 130-709
        • Catholic University St. Paul Hospital
    • Dongjak-gu
      • Seoul, Dongjak-gu, Korea, Republic of, 156-755
        • Chung-Ang Univ. Medical center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male and female aged between 30 and 70 years, inclusive
  2. Subjects who want improvement of bilateral nasolabial folds that are rated as 3 or 4 points on Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale
  3. Subjects with visually symmetrical bilateral nasolabial folds
  4. Subjects who consent to abstain from wrinkle improvement treatment in the lower face (below the lower orbital rim) during this trial
  5. Subjects who are capable of understanding and following instructions, and participating in the entire course of the trial
  6. Subjects who voluntarily decide to participate in this trial and provide written consent in the Informed Consent Form

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects who administered an anticoagulant (except for low-dose aspirin (100mg, up to 300mg/day) or equivalent) within 2 weeks prior to screening
  2. Subjects who had face-lift, soft tissue augmentation, medium or deeper peeling, or dermal photo-rejuvenation on the lower face (lower orbital rim) for wrinkle improvement within 6 months prior to screening
  3. Subjects who received treatment with calcium hydroxyapatite(CaHA) at the investigational medical device injection site within 1 year from screening
  4. Subjects who have implanted a permanent expander prosthesis at the investigational medical device injection site, such as soft-form or silicon
  5. Subjects with a scar or skin lesion at the investigational medical device injection site that may interfere with judgment of the treatment effect
  6. Subjects with a history of anaphylaxis or severe complicated allergy or allergy to lidocaine or hyaluronic acid products
  7. Subjects with a history of a hypertrophic scar or keloid
  8. Subjects with a skin disease or wound infection at the investigational medical device injection site
  9. Subjects who participated in another clinical trial within 30 days prior to screening
  10. Pregnant or breastfeeding women or women of childbearing potential who are not using medically acceptable contraception or not consenting to practice birth control from screening to the end of trial
  11. Subjects who are otherwise determined by the investigator as ineligible for this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Neuramis® Deep Lidocaine
Neuramis® Deep Lidocaine Hyaluronic Acid Gel and Lidocaine Hydrochlorid, total dose 1ml, single injection
HA filler
Active Comparator: Restylane® PERLANE-L
Restylane® PERLANE-L Hyaluronic Acid Gel and Lidocaine Hydrochlorid, total dose 1ml, single injection
HA filler

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale as evaluated by photograph raters using photographs
Time Frame: from baseline to 24 weeks
from baseline to 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change on Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale as evaluated by an investigator
Time Frame: from baseline to 8, 16, 24 weeks
from baseline to 8, 16, 24 weeks
Proportion of subjects with a ≥ 1 point change on Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale as evaluated by an investigator
Time Frame: from baseline to 8, 16, 24 weeks
from baseline to 8, 16, 24 weeks
Change on Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale as evaluated by photograph raters using photographs
Time Frame: from baseline to 8, 16 weeks
from baseline to 8, 16 weeks
Proportion of subjects with a ≥ 1 point change on Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale as evaluated by photograph raters
Time Frame: from baseline to 8, 16, 24 weeks
from baseline to 8, 16, 24 weeks
Proportion of subjects with a ≥ 1 point on Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale as evaluated by an investigator
Time Frame: 8, 16, 24 weeks after the injection
8, 16, 24 weeks after the injection
Proportion of subjects with a ≥ 1 point on Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale as evaluated by a subject
Time Frame: 8, 16, 24 weeks after the injection
8, 16, 24 weeks after the injection
Visual Analogue Scale as evaluated by a subject
Time Frame: at 15, 30, 45, 60 minutes after the injection
at 15, 30, 45, 60 minutes after the injection
Vital signs, physical examination, laboratory tests and adverse events
Time Frame: from baseline to 24 weeks
from baseline to 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hoon Kang, Catholic University St. Paul Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: BeomJoon Kim, Chung-Ang Univ. Medical center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

April 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 26, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe