Evaluation of Resuscitation Markers in Trauma Patients

May 11, 2019 updated by: Andrea Campos-Serra

Severe trauma patients have an elevated risk of multiple organ failure and death. In order to increase survival possibilities the initial treatment must be focused into resuscitation from shock. Traditionally the most common resuscitation markers used are vital signs and urine output. Unfortunately, many patients might present normal vital signs, but still undergo a compensated shock with persistent acidosis, hence being able to develop multiple organ failure and death. Consequently, it is important to define better resuscitation markers for these patients.

This investigation project consists in an observational prospective study, performed by a multidisciplinary team, in which different resuscitation markers are evaluated in severe trauma patients. There will be a specific timing (1st, 8th and 24th hours from arrival) evaluation of different markers: hemodynamic (vital signs, urine output, etc); analytical (lactate, base excess, natriuretic atrial peptide); tissue perfusion markers (NIRS); microcirculation markers (videomicroscopy) and coagulopathy markers (thromboelastometry). There will be a registry of total volume administration; blood cell transfusions and vasoactive drug requirements. Each marker will be evaluated in relation to mortality; multiple organ failure; massive transfusion protocol activation; blood cell transfusion requirement; surgical control of bleeding requirement and emergent arteriographic embolization. The objective of this study is to demonstrate which of these markers is better to predict hemodynamic evolution of severe trauma patients and might become a guide for resuscitation in the future.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Barcelona
      • Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain, 08208
        • Corporacion Sanitaria Parc Tauli

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Severe trauma patients admitted at Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Tauli

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pre-hospital Priority 0 protocol activation:
  • Glasgow coma scale < 14
  • Systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg
  • Respiratory rate < 10 or > 29 breaths per minute
  • Absent peripheral pulses
  • Pre-hospital Priority 1 protocol activation:
  • All penetratin injuries to head, neck, torso and extremities proximal to elbow and knee
  • Flail chest
  • Two or more proximal long-bone fractures
  • Crushed, degloved or mangled extremity
  • Amputation proximal to wrist and ankle
  • Pelvic fracture
  • Open or depressed skull fracture
  • Paralysis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hospitalization < 24 hours ( transport of the patient to an other trauma center)
  • Patients transported from an other hospital (first hours of medical support done elsewhere)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Severe trauma patients

No interventions are done. It's a prospective and descriptive observational study where different markers are analyzed:

  • Blood Lactate levels
  • Blood Base Excess levels
  • Blood B-type Natriuretic Peptide levels
  • Blood Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) alterations
  • Near-infrared spectroscopy alterations
  • Sublingual videomicroscopy alterations

All these markers are analyzed at the 1rst, 8th and 24th hour from hospital admission.

Analyzed at the 1rst, 8th and 24th hour from hospital admission
Analyzed at the 1rst, 8th and 24th hour from hospital admission
Analyzed at the 1rst, 8th and 24th hour from hospital admission
Analyzed at the 1rst, 8th and 24th hour from hospital admission
Analyzed at the 1rst, 8th and 24th hour from hospital admission
Analyzed at the 1rst, 8th and 24th hour from hospital admission

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1-2 years
Death of the patient
Through study completion, an average of 1-2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Multiple organ dysfunction (Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1-2 years
Marshall's score (MODS Score) consist on the analysis of 6 systems through different descriptors, those descriptors include: a) the respiratory system (pO2/FIO2 ratio); b) the renal system (serum creatinine concentration); c) the hepatic system (serum bilirrubine concentration); d) the hematologic system (platelet count); and e) the central nervous system (Glasgow Coma Scale); and f) the cardiovascular system (pressure adjusted heart rate). The cardiovascular system descriptor is calculated as the product of the heart rate and the ratio of central venous pressure to mean arterial pressure. All these descriptors will be measured during the first 24h from hospital admission.
Through study completion, an average of 1-2 years
Blood cell transfusion
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1-2 years
Need for blood cell transfusion for patients
Through study completion, an average of 1-2 years
Activation of the Massive blood transfusion protocol
Time Frame: At hospital admission
Need for massive transfusion protocol activation on patients with suspicion of active bleeding
At hospital admission
Surgical intervention for bleeding control
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1-2 years
Need for surgical control on patients with active bleeding
Through study completion, an average of 1-2 years
Arteriographic embolization for bleeding control
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1-2 years
Need for arteriographic embolization on patients with active bleeding
Through study completion, an average of 1-2 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital stay
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1-2 years
Number of days that the patient remains in hospital
Through study completion, an average of 1-2 years
Intensive care unit stay
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1-2 years
Number of days that the patient remains in the intensive care unit
Through study completion, an average of 1-2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrea Campos-Serra, MD, Corporacion Sanitaria Parc Tauli
  • Study Director: Salvador Navarro-Soto, MD, PhD, Corporacion Sanitaria Parc Tauli
  • Study Director: Sandra Montmany-Vioque, MD, PhD, Corporacion Sanitaria Parc Tauli

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 26, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

March 26, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 13, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trauma

Clinical Trials on Blood Lactate

3
Subscribe