Cancer Chronic Pain Predicted by Emotional and Cognitive Status (CanoPEe)

March 31, 2020 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
The aim of this study is to investigate the predictive dimension of cognitive-emotional status of cancer patients on the chronic pain development 6 months after different cancer treatment protocol (surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormone therapy, targeted therapy ...).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is an observational, longitudinal and multicenter study assessing in cancer patients the link between the cognitive-emotional status and the development of chronic pain.

Cognition, anxiety, depression, quality of life, social vulnerability, cancer perception, pain and analgesic consumption are assessed.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

89

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63003
        • CHU Clermont-Ferrand

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

cancer patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Cancer patient with one or more programmed cancer treatment protocols (chemotherapy, surgery, hormone therapy, radiation therapy, targeted therapy, ...)
  • Acceptance to sign the non-opposition form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of cancer and cancer treatment protocols (chemotherapy, surgery, hormone therapy, radiation therapy, targeted therapy, ...)
  • History and/or presence of primary brain tumors (glioblastoma, meningioma, neurofibroma ...)
  • History of neurological disorders (Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, epilepsy, moderate to severe head injury, ...)
  • History of psychiatric disorders (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, ...)
  • Medical and surgical history incompatible with the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
cancer patients

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measure of average pain intensity by a numerical rating scale
Time Frame: 7 days before the visit
Measure of average pain intensity by a numerical rating scale assessed 7 days before the 6 months visit after inclusion of patients.
7 days before the visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain assessment by numerical rating scale and DN4
Time Frame: at baseline
at baseline
Pain assessment by numerical rating scale and DN4
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Pain assessment by numerical rating scale and DN4
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Pain assessment by numerical rating scale and DN4
Time Frame: at 24 months
at 24 months
Pain assessment by numerical rating scale and DN4
Time Frame: 2 days after each cancer treatment protocol
2 days after each cancer treatment protocol
Evaluation of analgesic consumption
Time Frame: at day 1
Analgesic consumption is evaluated during all period of the study (name of the specialty, dose, indication, form, administration route, starting date, end date),
at day 1
Cognitive assessment by Trail Making Test A and B (TMT)
Time Frame: at baseline
at baseline
Cognitive assessment by Trail Making Test A and B (TMT)
Time Frame: at 24 months
at 24 months
Cognitive assessment by Trail Making Test A and B (TMT)
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Cognitive assessment by Trail Making Test A and B (TMT)
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) and FACT-COG
Time Frame: at baseline
at baseline
Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) and FACT-COG
Time Frame: at 24 months
at 24 months
Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) and FACT-COG
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) and FACT-COG
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Quality of life assessment
Time Frame: at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months,

Quality of life assessment by:

- The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. It is divided in 9 subscales consisting of several items: 5 subscales measuring functional status (physical, role, social, emotional, cognitive), three subscales measuring symptoms (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting) and a global subscale of quality of life and health. Finally, six items/isolated symptoms, covering cancer symptoms and frequent side effects of cancer therapies (e.g. loss of appetite) are also included in the EORTC QLQ-C30. The EORTC QLQ-C30 Score ranges from 0 to 126

at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months,
Social vulnerability assessment by EPICES questionnaire
Time Frame: at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Anxiety and Depression assessment by HAD scale
Time Frame: at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Illness perception assessment
Time Frame: at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Global score ranges from 0 to 200
at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Coping strategies assessment by Coping strategies questionnaire (CSQ)
Time Frame: 2 days after each cancer treatment protocol.
2 days after each cancer treatment protocol.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 15, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

November 12, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 19, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on chronic pain

3
Subscribe