Evaluation of Persistent Postsurgical Pain After Breast Surgery With a Pectoral Nerves Block (Pecs) Type II

February 13, 2019 updated by: GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus

Evaluation of Persistent Postsurgical Pain After Breast Surgery With a Pectoral Nerves Block (Pecs) Type II: a Prospective Follow-up After a Prospective Double Blind Placebo-controlled Randomized Controlled Trail

Background and objectives The Pectoral Nerves Block (Pecs) Type II is a regional anesthesia technique that provides post-surgical pain relief for patients undergoing breast surgery. Post-procedural pain relief is known to diminish persistent pain. In this prospective follow-up, the investigators evaluated whether the Pecs II block, compared to placebo, is effective in reducing persistent post-procedural pain after breast cancer surgery in female patients.

Patients and methods 140 breast cancer stage 1-3 patients undergoing mastectomy or tumorectomy with sentinel node or axillary node dissection under general anesthesia were randomized to receive a Pecs block (levobupivacaine 0.25%) or placebo (saline 0.9%). Patients were invited between 9 and 31 months after surgery to complete a persistent postsurgical pain survey.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. For breast cancer patients, surgery is the most effective therapeutic intervention. Up to two thirds of female patients undergoing breast cancer surgery develop chronic post-procedural pain. This can be best understood by the fact that chronic post-procedural pain is strongly associated with acute post-procedural pain and that even minimal breast surgery can result in significant post-procedural pain.

Regional anesthesia techniques can improve acute and chronic post-procedural pain outcomes. In the prospective double blind placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial, the investigators found that the pectoral nerves (Pecs) block type II, as described by Blanco et al., provides reliable and effective post-procedural analgesia for patients undergoing breast surgery.

In this prospective follow-up, the investigators evaluate whether the Pecs II block is effective in reducing chronic post-procedural pain in female adult patients undergoing breast cancer surgery compared to placebo.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

121

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Antwerpen
      • Wilrijk, Antwerpen, Belgium, 2610
        • Gza Sint Augustinus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • participated in the Large-scale Prospective Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Pecs II Block for Breast Surgery (NCT02544282)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient refusal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Pecs group (study group)
Chronic pain assessment with study questionnaire
Chronic pain assessment with study questionnaire
Other: Control group (placebo group)
Chronic pain assessment with study questionnaire
Chronic pain assessment with study questionnaire

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Chronic post- procedural pain evaluation through questionaire
Time Frame: 1-3 years
Evaluation of the chronic post procedural pain in breast surgery under general anesthesia with a pecs or placebo block
1-3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Patrick Van Houwe, MD, GZA Ziekenhuizen campus Sint-Augustinus

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 2, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 12, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

April 24, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GZA-ANE-PECS-02

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Chronic pain evaluation

Subscribe