Effects of Exergame, Conventional Exercise, and Mixed Exercise On Proprioception, Balance, & Mobility on Males Elderly (FITT)

May 17, 2016 updated by: Hassan Sadeghi, Universiti Putra Malaysia

Comparative Effects of Kinect Game ™ Exercise, Conventional Balance Exercise, and Concurrent Exercise On Knee Proprioception, Balance, And Functional Mobility on Males Elderly

Falling of the elderly as one of the greatest issues and major health problems among the elderly population has produced a further discussion among gerontologists and physical therapists. Moreover, they are considered as one of the major health problems among the aging population and by now around a third of 65-year-old adults fall as a minimum once a year while 6% of such falls cause fractures. Loss of the balance is the main reason for falling among the elderly. Proprioception is the sensory feedback regarding the joint position sense and movement which can accordingly lead to a decrease in the postural stability and steadiness of the elderly people. Proprioception has shown to be a risk factor for falls in older people. proprioception can be modified by physical training. Recently, exergaming, the playing of video games with body movements, has been proposed as effective strategy to deliver exercise.

Aim of study: the current research investigates the effect of 8 weeks videogame game exercise, conventional balance exercise, and a combined of the two (mixed training) on knee proprioception, static balance, and mobility of elderly male. Methodology: The study was designed as a single-blinded, randomized, controlled intervention trial. Sixty-four male ages 65 years and above were randomly assigned into an exergame group, a traditional balance exercise group, a mixed training group or a passive control group. After pretest all participant perform 8 weeks of exercise and measured the effects of the training regimens on proprioception and other functional outcomes as well as mood states in healthy older adults.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The subjects should be 65 years old and above.
  2. The participants should be able to walk independently for a minimum of 10 meter.
  3. The participants should be able to do their daily activities such as eating, going to bathroom, and taking a shower.
  4. The participants should be able to do low-level balance exercise

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The participants who had cognitive problems.
  2. The participants who could not walk and do their daily activities independently.
  3. The participants who have knee fracture or joint replacement.
  4. The participant who had regular balance exercise or resistance training in lower body in past 3 months.
  5. The participant who had neurological and cardiovascular problem

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: XBox Kinact Exercise
Kinact game intervention group performed three times per week on non-consecutive days for eight weeks
This study is designed to examine and comparing there intervention program on balance, mobility and knee proprioception among male elderly
Other Names:
  • Exercise or intervention
Experimental: conventional balance exercises
conventional balance exercises group performed three times per week on non-consecutive days for eight weeks
This study is designed to examine and comparing there intervention program on balance, mobility and knee proprioception among male elderly
Other Names:
  • Exercise or intervention
Experimental: concurrent exercise group
Concurrent group performed mixed conventional balance and Xbox Kinact exercises three times per week on non-consecutive days for eight weeks
This study is designed to examine and comparing there intervention program on balance, mobility and knee proprioception among male elderly
Other Names:
  • Exercise or intervention
No Intervention: control Group
There is no exercise for this group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
knee joint position sense
Time Frame: At Eight weeks
A Biodex Isokinetic Dynamometer (Biodex 3, 20 Ramsay Rode, Shirley, New York) was used to assess the proprioception of the subjects. The knee joint proprioception was investigated at target angles 30°, 45° and 60° . participants' legs were passively moved to the target angles, their knees were held at the target position for 10 seconds, and then returned to the starting position (90˚). Then, the participants were asked to extend their knees by pushing the dynamometer lever arm toward the previously selected target angle. The mean joint positioning error of the three measurement degrees of error from the target
At Eight weeks
One Leg stance
Time Frame: At eight weeks
The single leg stance test or one leg stance (OLS) test was conducted to measure static balance . This test was performed in open and close eye on separate trials.
At eight weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time Frame: At Eight Weeks
Time Up and Go Test, were conducted to measure functional mobility before and after exercise protocol
At Eight Weeks
10 meter walking test
Time Frame: At Eight Weeks
10 meter walking test was used to measure functional mobility before and after exercise protocol.
At Eight Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 20, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 20, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FPSK(EX14)P031(FR14)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

I am not prefer to share data now

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Accidental Falls

Clinical Trials on Exercise

Subscribe