An Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability Study Comparing Dolutegravir Plus Lamivudine With Dolutegravir Plus Tenofovir/Emtricitabine in Treatment naïve HIV Infected Subjects (Gemini 1)

A Phase III, Randomised, Double Blind, Multicentre, Parallel Group, Non Inferiority Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Dolutegravir Plus Lamivudine Compared to Dolutegravir Plus Tenofovir/Emtricitabine in Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1 Infected Treatment naïve Adults

This study will compare safety, efficacy, and tolerability of a two drug regimen of dolutegravir (DTG) plus (+) lamivudine (3TC) administered once daily with DTG plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (Tenofovir [TDF]/Emtricitabine [FTC] fixed dose combination [FDC]) administered once daily in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 1 infected adult participants that have not previously received antiretroviral therapy. The study is designed to demonstrate the non-inferior antiviral activity of DTG plus 3TC regimen to that of DTG plus TDF/FTC FDC and will characterise the long term antiviral activity, tolerability and safety of DTG plus 3TC through Week 148. Approximately, 700 participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive DTG + 3TC or DTG + TDF/FTC FDC. Participants will be stratified by screening HIV 1 ribonucleotide nucleic acid (RNA) levels and by screening CD4+ (cluster of differentiation 4) cell count.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: HIV Infections; Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: Dolutegravir (DTG); Drug: Lamivudine (3TC); Drug: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC FDC)

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 719
• Phase: Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Argentina
  • Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1141
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1202
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Buenos Aires
    • Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1181ACH
      • GSK Investigational Site
    • Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1405CKC
      • GSK Investigational Site
• Australia
  • New South Wales
    • Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia, 2010
      • GSK Investigational Site
    • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2010
      • GSK Investigational Site
  • Queensland
    • Fortitude Valley, Queensland, Australia, 4006
      • GSK Investigational Site
• Belgium
  • Antwerpen, Belgium, 2000
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Brussels, Belgium, 1000
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Brussels, Belgium, 1070
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Bruxelles, Belgium, 1200
    • GSK Investigational Site
• Canada
  • Ontario
    • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6
      • GSK Investigational Site
  • Quebec
    • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2L 4E9
      • GSK Investigational Site
    • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2L 4P9
      • GSK Investigational Site
• France
  • Le Kremlin-Bicetre Cedex, France, 94275
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Marseille, France, 13003
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Paris, France, 75013
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Paris Cedex 10, France, 75475
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Paris Cedex 12, France, 75571
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Toulouse Cedex 9, France, 31059
    • GSK Investigational Site
• Germany
  • Berlin, Germany, 10439
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Hamburg, Germany, 20146
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Bayern
    • Muenchen, Bayern, Germany, 80336
      • GSK Investigational Site
  • Nordrhein-Westfalen
    • Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, 53127
      • GSK Investigational Site
    • Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, 45122
      • GSK Investigational Site
• Italy
  • Padova, Italy, 35128
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Reggio Emilia, Italy, 42121
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Roma, Italy, 00149
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Emilia-Romagna
    • Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy, 40138
      • GSK Investigational Site
    • Ferrara, Emilia-Romagna, Italy, 44100
      • GSK Investigational Site
  • Liguria
    • Genova, Liguria, Italy, 16132
      • GSK Investigational Site
  • Lombardia
    • Brescia, Lombardia, Italy, 25123
      • GSK Investigational Site
    • Busto Arsizio (VA), Lombardia, Italy, 21052
      • GSK Investigational Site
    • Milano, Lombardia, Italy, 20127
      • GSK Investigational Site
    • Pavia, Lombardia, Italy, 27100
      • GSK Investigational Site
• Korea, Republic of
  • Busan, Korea, Republic of, 49241
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Daegu, Korea, Republic of, 41944
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 137-701
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 152-703
    • GSK Investigational Site
• Mexico
  • Distrito Federal, Mexico, 06470
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Jalisco
    • Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, 44160
      • GSK Investigational Site
    • Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico, 45170
      • GSK Investigational Site
• Netherlands
  • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3015 CE
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3079 DZ
    • GSK Investigational Site
• Portugal
  • Coimbra, Portugal, 3000-075
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Lisboa, Portugal, 1169-050
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Porto, Portugal, 4369-004
    • GSK Investigational Site
• Romania
  • Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 400348
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Galati, Romania, 800179
    • GSK Investigational Site
• Russian Federation
  • Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620149
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Krasnojarsk, Russian Federation, 660049
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Moscow, Russian Federation, 105275
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Orel, Russian Federation, 302040
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 196645
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Toliyatti, Russian Federation, 445846
    • GSK Investigational Site
• South Africa
  • Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa, 7925
    • GSK Investigational Site
• Spain
  • Alicante, Spain, 03010
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Badalona, Spain, 08916
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Córdoba, Spain, 14004
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Elche (Alicante), Spain, 03203
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Madrid, Spain, 28007
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Madrid, Spain, 28034
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Madrid, Spain, 28031
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Madrid, Spain, 28911
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Mataró, Spain, 08304
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • San Sebastian, Spain, 20080
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 15706
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Valencia, Spain, 46014
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Vigo, Spain, 36312
    • GSK Investigational Site
• Taiwan
  • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 824
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Taipei, Taiwan, 11217
    • GSK Investigational Site
• United Kingdom
  • London, United Kingdom, SE1 9RT
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • London, United Kingdom, SW10 9NH
    • GSK Investigational Site
  • Manchester, United Kingdom, M8 5RB
    • GSK Investigational Site
• United States
  • Arizona
    • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85015
      • GSK Investigational Site
  • District of Columbia
    • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20037
      • GSK Investigational Site
  • Florida
    • Fort Pierce, Florida, United States, 34982
      • GSK Investigational Site
    • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32806
      • GSK Investigational Site
    • West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33407
      • GSK Investigational Site
  • Georgia
    • Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30033
      • GSK Investigational Site
  • Indiana
    • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
      • GSK Investigational Site
  • Massachusetts
    • Springfield, Massachusetts, United States, 01199
      • GSK Investigational Site
  • Michigan
    • Berkley, Michigan, United States, 48072
      • GSK Investigational Site
  • Missouri
    • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64111
      • GSK Investigational Site
    • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63108
      • GSK Investigational Site
  • North Carolina
    • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599-7064
      • GSK Investigational Site
  • Pennsylvania
    • Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States, 18102
      • GSK Investigational Site
  • Rhode Island
    • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02906
      • GSK Investigational Site
  • Texas
    • Bellaire, Texas, United States, 77401
      • GSK Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Must be an HIV 1 infected adult >=18 years of age (or older, if required by local regulations) at the time of signing the informed consent

• An eligible female participant should not be pregnant (as confirmed by a negative serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) test at Screening and negative urine test at Baseline), not lactating, and at least one of the following conditions applies

  • Non reproductive premenopausal women are those that have undergone documented tubal ligation or documented hysteroscopic tubal occlusion procedure with follow up confirmation of bilateral tubal occlusion or documented bilateral oophorectomy or hysterectomy
  • Non reproductive premenopausal women are those with 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea and >=45 years of age
  • Women with reproductive potential agree to follow one of the protocol-defined methods for avoiding pregnancy
• Should have screening plasma HIV 1 RNA levels of 1000 c/mL to <=100,000 c/mL. If an independent review of accumulated data from other clinical trials investigating the DTG plus 3TC dual regimen is supportive of the DTG plus 3TC treatment regimen, enrolment will be opened to participants with Screening plasma HIV 1 RNA of 1000 c/mL to <=500,000 c/mL
• Participants should be antiretroviral naïve (defined as <=10 days of prior therapy with any antiretroviral agent following a diagnosis of HIV 1 infection). Participants who received HIV post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) or pre exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in the past are allowed as long as the last PEP/PrEP dose was >1 year from HIV diagnosis or there is documented HIV seronegativity between the last prophylactic dose and the date of HIV diagnosis
• Participant or the participants legal representative capable of giving signed informed consent which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the consent form and the protocol
• Participants enrolled in France: a participant will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if either affiliated to or a beneficiary of a social security category

Exclusion Criteria

• Women who are breastfeeding or plan to become pregnant or breastfeed during the study
• Any evidence of an active centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) Stage 3 disease (CDC, 2014), except cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma not requiring systemic therapy and historical or current CD4 cell counts less than 200 cells/mm^3
• Participants with severe hepatic impairment (Class C) as determined by Child Pugh classification
• Unstable liver disease (as defined by the presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminaemia, oesophageal or gastric varices, or persistent jaundice), cirrhosis, known biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones
• Evidence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection or HBV surface antibody (anti-HBs or HBsAb) based on:

Participants positive for HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) at screening will be excluded Participants negative for HBV core antibody (anti HBs) but positive for anti HBc (negative HBsAg status) and positive for HBV deoxyribose nucleic acid (DNA) will be excluded; however, participants positive for anti HBc (negative HBsAg status) and positive for anti HBs (past and/or current evidence) are immune to HBV and will not be excluded

• Anticipated need for any hepatitis B virus (HCV) therapy during the first 48 weeks of the study and for HCV therapy based on interferon or any drugs that have a potential for adverse drug:drug interactions with study treatment throughout the entire study period
• Untreated syphilis infection positive RPR at Screening without clear documentation of treatment. Participants who are at least 14 days post completed treatment are eligible
• History or presence of allergy or intolerance to the study drugs or their components or drugs of their class
• Ongoing malignancy other than cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma, basal cell carcinoma, or resected, non invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, or cervical, anal or penile intraepithelial neoplasia; other localised malignancies require agreement between the investigator and the Study Medical Monitor for inclusion of the participant
• Participants who in the Investigator's judgment, poses a significant suicidality risk. Recent history of suicidal behaviour and/or suicidal ideation may be considered as evidence of serious suicide risk
• Treatment with an HIV 1 immunotherapeutic vaccine within 90 days of Screening

• Treatment with any of the following agents within 28 days of Screening:

  • Radiation therapy,
  • Cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents,
  • Any systemic immune suppressant
• Treatment with any agent, except recognised ART as allowed above, with documented activity against HIV 1 in vitro within 28 days of first dose of study treatment
• Exposure to an experimental drug or experimental vaccine within either 28 days, 5 half lives of the test agent, or twice the duration of the biological effect of the test agent, whichever is longer, prior to the first dose of study treatment
• Participants enrolled in France: the participant has participated in any study using an investigational drug during the previous 60 days or 5 half lives, or twice the duration of the biological effect of the experimental drug or vaccine, whichever is longer, prior to screening for the study or the participant will participate simultaneously in another clinical study
• Any evidence of pre existing viral resistance based on the presence of any major resistance associated mutation in the Screening result or, if known, in any historical resistance test result
• Any verified Grade 4 laboratory abnormality. A single repeat test is allowed during the Screening period to verify a result
• Any acute laboratory abnormality at Screening, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would preclude the participants participation in the study of an investigational compound
• Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >=5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) or ALT >=3xULN and bilirubin >=1.5xULN (with >35% direct bilirubin)
• Creatinine clearance of <50 mL/min per 1.73 m^2 via the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD EPI) method

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: DTG + TDF/FTC FDC (50 mg+300/200 mg); Eligible participants will receive one 50 mg tablet of DTG plus one overencapsulated TDF/ FTC FDC (300/200 mg) tablet orally once daily upto 96 weeks; thereafter will receive DTG plus TDF/FTC FDC tablets upto Week 148 (open-label randomised phase).	Drug: Dolutegravir (DTG); DTG is available as 50 mg white, round, biconvex, film coated tablet debossed on one side with 'SV 572' and on the other side with '50'. The tablets are packaged into high density polyethylene (HDPE) bottles with induction seals and child resistant closures. Each 45 ml bottle contains 30 tablets and a desiccant. DTG 50 mg tablet will be orally administered once daily with or without food upto 148 weeks.; Drug: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC FDC); Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and Emtricitabine are available as swedish orange, 'AA' sized elongated double blind HPMC capsules containing 300 mg TDF and 200 mg FTC to visually match overencapsulated 3TC tablet. The capsules are packaged into HDPE bottles with induction seals and child resistant closures. Each 150 mL bottle contains 30 capsules and a desiccant. Overencapsulated tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine tablet will be orally administered once daily with or without food upto 96 weeks. From Week 96 to Week 148, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine will be dispensed as 300/200 mg white, blue, capsule shaped, film coated tablets debossed with 'GILEAD' on one side and '701' on another side, packed in overlabelled HDPE bottles with polypropylene childresistant closures each containing 30 tablets and a desiccant.
Experimental: DTG + 3TC (50 mg+300 mg); Eligible participants will receive one 50 mg tablet of DTG plus one overencapsulated 300 mg 3TC tablet orally once daily upto 96 weeks; thereafter will receive DTG plus 3TC tablet upto Week 148 and will continue to receive this schedule until (i) DTG and 3TC are both locally approved for use as part of a dual regimen, and the single entities of DTG and 3TC are available to patients (e.g. through public health services), or (ii) the DTG/3TC FDC tablet, if required by local regulations, is available, , or (iii) the participant no longer derives clinical benefit, or (iv) the participant meets a protocol defined reason for discontinuation, or (v) development of the DTG plus 3TC dual regimen is terminated.	Drug: Dolutegravir (DTG); DTG is available as 50 mg white, round, biconvex, film coated tablet debossed on one side with 'SV 572' and on the other side with '50'. The tablets are packaged into high density polyethylene (HDPE) bottles with induction seals and child resistant closures. Each 45 ml bottle contains 30 tablets and a desiccant. DTG 50 mg tablet will be orally administered once daily with or without food upto 148 weeks.; Drug: Lamivudine (3TC); Lamivudine is available as swedish orange, 'AA' sized elongated double blind HPMC capsules containing 300 mg lamivudine to visually match overencapsulated TDF/FTC FDC tablet. The capsules are packaged into HDPE bottles with induction seals and child resistant closures. Each 150 mL bottle contains 30 capsules and a desiccant. Overencapsulated 3TC 300 mg tablet will be orally administered once daily with or without food upto 96 weeks. From Week 96 to Week 148, lamivudine will be dispensed as 300 mg white, diamond shaped, scored, film coated tablets debossed with 'GX CJ7' on both sides, packed in over labelled HDPE bottles with child-resistant closures each containing 30 tablets.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) <50 Copies/mL (c/mL) at Week 48	Percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA<50 c/mL was obtained using Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot algorithm. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant antiretroviral therapy (ART) prior to the visit of interest. This endpoint was analyzed using a stratified analysis with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) weights. Intent-To-Treat Exposed (ITT-E) Population was used which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Percentage values are rounded to the nearest whole digit.	Week 48

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
CD4+ Cell Counts at Weeks 24 and 48	CD4+ cells are type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+. It was evaluated by flow cytometry.	Weeks 24 and 48
Changes From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 24 and 48	CD4+ cells are type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+. It was evaluated by flow cytometry. Baseline value is defined as the the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error has been presented. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for the following covariates/factors: treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), Baseline CD4+ cell count, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline CD4+ cell count and visit interaction, with visit as the repeated factor.	Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24, 48
Percentage Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids-Serum or Plasma Cholesterol, Serum or Plasma HDL Cholesterol (Direct), Serum or Plasma LDL Cholesterol (Calculated or Direct) and Serum or Plasma Triglycerides at Weeks 24, 48	Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of fasting lipids which included Serum or Plasma Cholesterol, Serum or Plasma HDL Cholesterol (Direct), Serum or Plasma LDL Cholesterol (Calculated or Direct) and Serum or Plasma Triglycerides. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as 100 multiplied by ([post-dose visit value minus Baseline value] divided by Baseline value).	Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24, 48
Percentage Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid-Serum or Plasma Total Cholesterol/HDL Cholesterol Ratio at Weeks 24, 48	Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of fasting lipid-Serum or Plasma Total Cholesterol/HDL Cholesterol Ratio. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Percentage change from Baseline was calculated as 100 multiplied by ([post-dose visit value minus Baseline value] divided by Baseline value).	Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24, 48
Changes From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 48 by Subgroups	CD4+ cells are type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+. It was evaluated by flow cytometry. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented for subgroups (Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, Baseline CD4+ cell count, Age group, Gender and race). For each subgroup, adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline in each arm calculated from Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for the following covariates/factors: treatment, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), Baseline CD4+ cell count, subgroup, and treatment and relevant subgroup interaction. For CD4+ cell count subgroup, Baseline CD4+ cell count group is included as a factor only.	Baseline (Day 1) and Week 48
Changes From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 24 by Subgroups	CD4+ cells are type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+. It was evaluated by flow cytometry. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented for subgroups (Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, Baseline CD4+ cell count, Age, Gender, and race). For each subgroup, adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline in each arm calculated from ANCOVA model adjusting for the following covariates/factors: treatment, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), Baseline CD4+ cell count, subgroup, and treatment and relevant subgroup interaction. For CD4+ cell count subgroup, Baseline CD4+ cell count group is included as a factor only.	Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Time to Viral Suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL) up to Week 144	Time of viral suppression is defined as the first viral load value <50 c/mL. Nonparametric Kaplan-Meier method was performed. Participants who withdrew for any reason without being suppressed were censored at date of withdrawal. Participants who have not been withdrawn and have not had viral suppression at time of the analysis were censored at last viral load date. Confidence Interval (CI) was estimated using the Brookmeyer-Crowley method.	Up to Week 144
CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 96	CD4+ cells are type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+ cells. Analysis was performed by flow cytometry.	Week 96
CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 144	CD4+ cells are type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+ cells. Analysis was performed by flow cytometry.	Week 144
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Genotypic Resistance up to Week 144	Number of participants, who met confirmed virologic withdrawal (CVW) criteria, with treatment emergent genotypic resistance to Integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) and/or Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) was summarized. The Viral Genotypic Population comprised of all participants in the ITT-E population who have available on-treatment genotypic resistance data.	Up to Week 144
Number of Participants Who Discontinue Treatment Due to AEs Over Week 144	An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Number of participants who discontinued treatment due to AEs have been reported.	Up to Week 144
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids-Serum or Plasma Cholesterol, Serum or Plasma HDL Cholesterol (Direct), Serum or Plasma LDL Cholesterol (Calculated or Direct) and Serum or Plasma Triglycerides at Week 96	Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of fasting lipids which included Serum or Plasma Cholesterol, Serum or Plasma HDL Cholesterol (Direct), Serum or Plasma LDL Cholesterol (Calculated or Direct) and Serum or Plasma Triglycerides. Baseline value was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented.	Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 96
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids-Serum or Plasma Cholesterol, Serum or Plasma HDL Cholesterol (Direct), Serum or Plasma LDL Cholesterol (Calculated or Direct) and Serum or Plasma Triglycerides at Week 144	Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of fasting lipids which included Serum or Plasma Cholesterol, Serum or Plasma HDL Cholesterol (Direct), Serum or Plasma LDL Cholesterol (Calculated or Direct) and Serum or Plasma Triglycerides. Baseline value was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented.	Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 144
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 24	Percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA<50 c/mL was obtained using FDA Snapshot algorithm. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant ART prior to the visit of interest. This endpoint was analyzed using a stratified analysis with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weights. Percentage values are rounded to the nearest whole digit.	Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 96	Percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA<50 c/mL was obtained using FDA Snapshot algorithm. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant ART prior to the visit of interest. This endpoint was analyzed using a stratified analysis with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weights. Percentage values are rounded to the nearest whole digit.	Week 96
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 144	Percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA<50 c/mL was obtained using FDA Snapshot algorithm. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant ART prior to the visit of interest. This endpoint was analyzed using a stratified analysis with CMH weights. Percentage values are rounded to the nearest whole digit.	Week 144
Changes From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 96	CD4+ cells are type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+ cells. Analysis was performed by flow cytometry. Baseline value is defined as the the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error has been presented. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for the following covariates/factors: treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), Baseline CD4+ cell count, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline CD4+ cell count and visit interaction, with visit as the repeated factor.	Baseline (Day 1) and Week 96
Changes From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 144	CD4+ cells are type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+ cells. Analysis was performed by flow cytometry. Baseline value is defined as the the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error has been presented. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for the following covariates/factors: treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), Baseline CD4+ cell count, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline CD4+ cell count and visit interaction, with visit as the repeated factor.	Baseline (Day 1) and Week 144
Number of Participants With HIV-1 Disease Progression up to Week 144	HIV-associated conditions were recorded during the study and was assessed according to the 2014 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Classification System for HIV Infection in Adults. Disease progressions summarize participants who had HIV infection stage 3 associated conditions or death. Indicators of clinical disease progression were defined as: CDC Category Stage 1 at enrollment to Stage 3 event; CDC Category Stage 2 at enrolment to Stage 3 event; CDC Category Stage 3 at enrollment to New Stage 3 Event; CDC Category Stage 1, 2 or 3 at enrolment to Death.	Up to Week 144
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Phenotypic Resistance up to Week 144	Number of participants, who meet CVW criteria, with treatment emergent phenotypic resistance to INSTI and/or NRTI were summarized. Assessment of antiviral activity of anti-retroviral therapy (ART) using phenotypic test results was interpreted through a proprietary algorithm (from Monogram Biosciences) and provides the overall susceptibility of the drug. Partially sensitive and resistant calls were considered resistant in this analysis. The Viral Phenotypic Population comprised of all participants in the ITT-E population who have available on-treatment phenotypic resistance data.	Up to Week 144
Number of Participants With Any AE and SAE up to Week 148	An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization but may jeopardize the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention or protocol defined event associated with liver injury and impaired liver function were categorized as SAE. Safety Population was used which comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.	Up to Week 148
Number of Participants With AEs by Maximum Severity Grades up to Week 144	An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs were evaluated by the investigator and graded according to the DAIDS toxicity scales from Grade 1 to 5 (1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Potentially life threatening, 5=Death). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms. Number of participants with adverse events by maximum grade have been presented.	Up to Week 144
Number of Participants With Any Drug Related AEs and Drug Related AEs by Maximum Grade up to Week 144	An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. AEs were evaluated by the investigator and graded according to the DAIDS toxicity scales from Grade 1 to 5. (1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Potentially life threatening, 5=Death). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms. Number of participants with drug related AEs and drug related AEs by by maximum grade have been presented.	Up to Week 144
Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities up to Week 144	Blood samples were collected up to Week 144 for assessment of hemoglobin, leukocytes, neutrophils and platelets. Any abnormality was graded according to DAIDS toxicity scales from Grade 1 to 4 (1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Potentially life threatening). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms. Only those participants with maximum post-Baseline emergent hematology toxicities in any of the listed hematology parameters have been presented.	Up to Week 144
Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Chemistry Toxicities up to Week 144	Blood samples were collected up to Week 144 for assessment of Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Albumin, Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Bilirubin, Carbon dioxide (CO2), Cholesterol, Creatine kinase (CK), Creatinine, Direct Bilirubin, Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from creatinine adjusted for body surface area (BSA), Hypercalcemia, Hyperglycemia, Hyperkalemia, Hypernatremia, Hypocalcemia, Hypoglycemia, Hypokalemia, Hyponatremia, Low density lipid (LDL) Cholesterol, Lactate Dehydrogenase, Lipase, Phosphate, and Triglycerides. Any abnormality was graded according to DAIDS toxicity scales from Grade 1 to 4 (1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Potentially life threatening). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms. Only those participants with maximum post-Baseline emergent chemistry toxicities in any of the chemistry parameters have been presented	Up to Week 144
Number of Participants Who Discontinue Treatment Due to AEs Over Weeks 24, 48, 96	An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. . Number of participants who discontinued treatment due to AEs have been reported.	Up to Week 24, Week 48 and Week 96
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers-Serum Cystatin C and Serum Retinol Binding Protein (RBP) at Weeks 24, 48	Blood and/or urine were collected to perform evaluation of renal inflammation biomarkers which included Serum Cystatin C and Serum Retinol Binding Protein (RBP). Baseline value is the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for: treatment, visit, baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), baseline CD4+ cell count (factor), age, sex (factor), race (factor), presence of diabetes mellitus (factor), presence of hypertension (factor), baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.	Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24, 48
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker-Serum Cystatin C at Week 96	Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of renal inflammation biomarkers which included Serum Cystatin C . Baseline value is the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for: treatment, visit, baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), baseline CD4+ cell count (factor), age, sex (factor), race (factor), presence of diabetes mellitus (factor), presence of hypertension (factor), baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.	Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 96
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker-Serum Cystatin C at Week 144	Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of renal biomarkers which included Serum Cystatin C. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Biomarkers were adjusted for treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, Baseline CD4+ cell count, age, sex, race, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented.	Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 144
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker-Serum RBP at Week 96	Blood and/or urine samples were collected to perform evaluation of renal biomarkers which included Serum RBP. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Biomarkers were adjusted for treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, Baseline CD4+ cell count, age, sex, race, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.	Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 96
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker-Serum RBP at Week 144	Blood and/or urine samples were collected to perform evaluation of renal biomarkers which included Serum RBP. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Biomarkers were adjusted for treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, Baseline CD4+ cell count, age, sex, race, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.	Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 144
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers-Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Serum or Plasma GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI at Weeks 24, 48	Blood and/or urine were collected to perform evaluation of renal inflammation biomarkers which included Serum GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI (GFR-cystatin C adjusted)and Serum or Plasma GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD-EPI. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for: treatment, visit, baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), baseline CD4+ cell count (factor), age, sex (factor), race (factor), presence of diabetes mellitus (factor), presence of hypertension (factor), baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.	Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24, 48
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers-Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum or Plasma GFR From Creatinine Adjusted for BSA Using CKD-EPI Method at Week 96	Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of renal biomarkers which included Serum GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI and Serum or Plasma GFR from creatinine adjusted for BSA using CKD-EPI. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose Assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Biomarkers were adjusted for treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, baseline CD4+ cell count, age, sex, race, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.	Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 96
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarkers-Serum GFR From Cystatin C Adjusted Using CKD-EPI and Serum or Plasma GFR From Creatinine Adjusted for BSA Using CKD-EPI Method at Week 144	Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of renal biomarkers which included Serum GFR from cystatin C adjusted using CKD-EPI and Serum or Plasma GFR from creatinine adjusted for BSA using CKD-EPI. Baseline value is the latest pre-dose Assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Biomarkers were adjusted for treatment, visit, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, baseline CD4+ cell count, age, sex, race, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hypertension, Baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and Baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.	Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 144
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker-Serum or Plasma Creatinine at Weeks 24, 48	Blood and/or urine were collected to perform evaluation of renal inflammation biomarker which included Serum or Plasma Creatinine. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for: treatment, visit, baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), baseline CD4+ cell count (factor), age, sex (factor), race (factor), presence of diabetes mellitus (factor), presence of hypertension (factor), baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.	Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24, 48
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker-Serum or Plasma Creatinine at Week 96	Blood and/or urine were collected to perform evaluation of renal inflammation biomarker which included Serum or Plasma Creatinine. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for: treatment, visit, baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), baseline CD4+ cell count (factor), age, sex (factor), race (factor), presence of diabetes mellitus (factor), presence of hypertension (factor), baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.	Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 96
Change From Baseline in Renal Biomarker-Serum or Plasma Creatinine at Week 144	Blood and/or urine were collected to perform evaluation of renal inflammation biomarker which included Serum or Plasma Creatinine. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for: treatment, visit, baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), baseline CD4+ cell count (factor), age, sex (factor), race (factor), presence of diabetes mellitus (factor), presence of hypertension (factor), baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.	Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 144
Ratio to Baseline in Renal Biomarkers-Urine and Serum Beta-2 Microglobulin (B2M), Urine Albumin/Creatinine, Urine B2M/Urine Creatinine, Urine Phosphate, Urine Protein/Creatinine, Urine RBP 4 and Urine RBP 4/Urine Creatinine at Weeks 24, 48	Blood and/or urine were collected to perform evaluation of renal inflammation biomarkers which included Urine and Serum B2M, Urine Albumin/Creatinine, Urine B2M/Urine Creatinine, Urine Phosphate, Urine Protein/Creatinine, Urine RBP 4 and Urine RBP 4/Urine Creatinine. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Ratio to Baseline was calculated as ratio of post-dose visit value over Baseline value. Statistical analysis of changes from baseline were performed on log-transformed data. Results were transformed back via exponential transformation such that treatment comparisons are assessed via odds ratios. Estimated ratio of geometric means (each visit over Baseline) and 95% confidence interval (CI) have been presented.	Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24, 48
Ratio to Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Albumin/Creatinine, Urine B2M/Urine Creatinine, Urine Phosphate, Urine Protein/Creatinine and Urine RBP 4/Urine Creatinine at Week 96	Blood and/or urine were collected to perform evaluation of renal inflammation biomarkers which included Urine Albumin/Creatinine, Urine B2M/Urine Creatinine, Urine Phosphate, Urine Protein/Creatinine, Urine RBP 4 and Urine RBP 4/Urine Creatinine. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Ratio to Baseline was calculated as ratio of post-dose visit value over Baseline value. Statistical analysis of changes from baseline were performed on log-transformed data. Results were transformed back via exponential transformation such that treatment comparisons are assessed via odds ratios. Estimated ratio of geometric means (each visit over Baseline) and 95% confidence interval (CI) have been presented.	Baseline (Day 1) and Week 96
Ratio to Baseline in Renal Biomarkers- Urine Albumin/Creatinine, Urine B2M/Urine Creatinine, Urine Phosphate, Urine Protein/Creatinine and Urine RBP 4/Urine Creatinine at Week 144	Blood and/or urine were collected to perform evaluation of renal inflammation biomarkers which included Urine and Serum B2M, Urine Albumin/Creatinine, Urine B2M/Urine Creatinine, Urine Phosphate, Urine Protein/Creatinine, Urine RBP 4 and Urine RBP 4/Urine Creatinine. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Ratio to Baseline was calculated as ratio of post-dose visit value over Baseline value. Statistical analysis of changes from baseline were performed on log-transformed data. Results were transformed back via exponential transformation such that treatment comparisons are assessed via odds ratios. Estimated ratio of geometric means (each visit over Baseline) and 95% confidence interval (CI) have been presented.	Baseline (Day 1) and Week 144
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-Serum Bone Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (Bone-ALP), Serum Osteocalcin, Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (PINP) and Serum Type I Collagen C-Telopeptides (CTX-1) at Weeks 24, 48	Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of bone biomarkers which included bone-ALP, Serum Osteocalcin, PINP and CTX-1. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for: treatment, visit, baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), baseline CD4+ cell count (factor), age, sex (factor), race (factor), BMI (factor), smoking status (factor), current Vitamin D use (factor), baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.	Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24, 48
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-Serum Bone-ALP, Serum Osteocalcin, Serum PINP and Serum Type I CTX-1 at Week 96	Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of bone biomarkers which included bone-ALP, Serum Osteocalcin, PINP and CTX-1. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for: treatment, visit, baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), baseline CD4+ cell count (factor), age, sex (factor), race (factor), BMI (factor), smoking status (factor), current Vitamin D use (factor), baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.	Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 96
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarkers-Serum Bone-ALP, Serum Osteocalcin, Serum PINP and Serum Type I CTX-1 at Week 144	Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of bone biomarkers which included bone-ALP, Serum Osteocalcin, PINP and CTX-1. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for: treatment, visit, baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), baseline CD4+ cell count (factor), age, sex (factor), race (factor), BMI (factor), smoking status (factor), current Vitamin D use (factor), baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.	Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 144
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker-Serum Vitamin D at Weeks 24, 48	Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of bone biomarker serum vitamin D. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for: treatment, visit, baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), baseline CD4+ cell count (factor), age, sex (factor), race (factor), BMI (factor), smoking status (factor), current Vitamin D use (factor), baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.	Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 24, 48
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker-Serum Vitamin D at Week 96	Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of bone biomarker serum vitamin D. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for: treatment, visit, baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), baseline CD4+ cell count (factor), age, sex (factor), race (factor), BMI (factor), smoking status (factor), current Vitamin D use (factor), baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.	Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 96
Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker-Serum Vitamin D at Week 144	Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of bone biomarker serum vitamin D. Baseline value is defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from baseline at each visit in each arm calculated from a repeated measures model adjusting for: treatment, visit, baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), baseline CD4+ cell count (factor), age, sex (factor), race (factor), BMI (factor), smoking status (factor), current Vitamin D use (factor), baseline biomarker value, treatment and visit interaction, and baseline biomarker value and visit interaction; with visit as the repeated factor.	Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 144
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid-Serum or Plasma Total Cholesterol/HDL Cholesterol Ratio at Week 96	Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of fasting lipid-Serum or Plasma Total Cholesterol/HDL Cholesterol Ratio. Baseline value was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error has been presented.	Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 96
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid-Serum or Plasma Total Cholesterol/HDL Cholesterol Ratio at Week 144	Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of fasting lipid-Serum or Plasma Total Cholesterol/HDL Cholesterol Ratio. Baseline value was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error has been presented.	Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 144
Percentage of Participants With Grade 2 or Greater Laboratory Abnormalities in Fasting LDL Cholesterol by Weeks 24, 48	Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of fasting LDL cholesterol. Any abnormalities were evaluated by the investigator and graded according to DAIDS toxicity scales from Grade 1 to 4 (1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Potentially life threatening). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms. Percentage of participants with Grade 2 or greater laboratory abnormalities in fasting LDL cholesterol by Weeks 24 and 48 have been presented. Participants without any post-Baseline fasting LDL cholesterol value prior to Week 48 or those who had Baseline lipids-lowering agents are not included. Lipid Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) data was used such that the last available fasted, on-treatment lipid value prior to the initiation of a lipid-lowering agent was used in place of future observed values. Percentage values are rounded to the nearest whole digit.	Weeks 24 and Week 48
Percentage of Participants With Grade 2 or Greater Laboratory Abnormalities in Fasting LDL Cholesterol by Week 96	Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of fasting LDL cholesterol. Any abnormalities were evaluated by the investigator and graded according to DAIDS toxicity scales from Grade 1 to 4 (1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Potentially life threatening). The higher the grade, the more severe the symptoms. Percentage of participants with Grade 2 or greater laboratory abnormalities in fasting LDL cholesterol by Week 96 have been presented. Participants without any post-Baseline fasting LDL cholesterol value prior to Week 96 or those who had Baseline lipids-lowering agents were not included. Lipid Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) data was used such that the last available fasted, on-treatment lipid value prior to the initiation of a lipid-lowering agent was used in place of future observed values. Percentage values are rounded to the nearest whole digit.	Week 96
Percentage of Participants With Grade 2 or Greater Laboratory Abnormalities in Fasting LDL Cholesterol by Week 144	Blood samples were collected to perform evaluation of fasting LDL cholesterol. Any abnormalities were evaluated by the investigator and graded according to DAIDS toxicity scales from Grade 1 to 4 (1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Potentially life threatening). Percentage of participants with Grade 2 or greater laboratory abnormalities in fasting LDL cholesterol by Week 144 have been presented. Participants without any post-Baseline fasting LDL cholesterol value prior to Week 144 or those who had Baseline lipids-lowering agents were not included. Lipid Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) data was used such that the last available fasted, on-treatment lipid value prior to the initiation of a lipid-lowering agent was used in place of future observed values. Percentage values are rounded to the nearest whole digit.	Week 144
Percentage of Participants by Subgroups (by Age, Gender, Baseline CD4+ Cell Count, Baseline HIV-1 RNA, Race) With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 24	Percentage of participants by subgroups (by age, gender, Baseline CD4+ cell count, Baseline HIV-1 RNA, race) with HIV-1 RNA<50 c/mL was obtained using FDA Snapshot algorithm. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant ART prior to the visit of interest. Data was presented by subgroups: age (<35, 35 to <50, >=50 years); gender (males and females), Baseline CD4+ cell count (<=200, >200), Baseline HIV-1 RNA (<=100000, >100000) and Race (White, African American/African H., Asian, Other). Percentage values are rounded to the nearest whole digit.	Week 24
Percentage of Participants by Subgroups (by Age, Gender, Baseline CD4+ Cell Count Baseline HIV-1 RNA, Race) With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 48	Percentage of participants by subgroups (by age, gender, Baseline CD4+ cell count, Baseline HIV-1 RNA, race) with HIV-1 RNA<50 c/mL was obtained using FDA Snapshot algorithm. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant ART prior to the visit of interest. Data was presented by subgroups: age (<35, 35 to <50, >=50 years); gender (males and females), Baseline CD4+ cell count (<=200, >200), Baseline HIV-1 RNA (<=100000, >100000) and Race (White, African American/African H., Asian, Other). Percentage values are rounded to the nearest whole digit.	Week 48
Percentage of Participants by Subgroups (by Age, Gender, Baseline CD4+ Cell Count Baseline HIV-1 RNA, Race) With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 96	Percentage of participants by subgroups (by age, gender, Baseline CD4+ cell count, Baseline HIV-1 RNA, race) with HIV-1 RNA<50 c/mL was obtained using FDA Snapshot algorithm. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant ART prior to the visit of interest. Data was presented by subgroups: age (<35, 35 to <50, >=50 years); gender (males and females), Baseline CD4+ cell count (<=200 cells/mm^3, >200 cells/mm^3), Baseline HIV-1 RNA (<=100000, >100000) and Race (White, African American/African H., Asian and other). Percentage values are rounded to the nearest whole digit.	Week 96
Percentage of Participants by Subgroups (by Age, Gender, Baseline CD4+ Cell Count Baseline HIV-1 RNA, Race) With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 144	Percentage of participants by subgroups (by age, gender, Baseline CD4+ cell count, Baseline HIV-1 RNA, race) with HIV-1 RNA<50 c/mL was obtained using FDA Snapshot algorithm. The Snapshot algorithm treated all participants without HIV-1 RNA data at the visit of interest (due to missing data or discontinuation of investigational product prior to the visit window) as non-responders, as well as participants who switch their concomitant ART prior to the visit of interest. Data was presented by subgroups: age (<35, 35 to <50, >=50 years); gender (males and females), Baseline CD4+ cell count (<=200 cells/mm^3, >200 cells/mm^3), Baseline HIV-1 RNA (<=100000, >100000) and Race (White, African American/African H., Asian and other). Percentage values are rounded to the nearest whole digit.	Week 144
Changes From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 96 by Subgroups	CD4+ cells are type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+. It was evaluated by flow cytometry. Baseline value is the the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented for subgroups (Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, Baseline CD4+ cell count, Age group, Gender and race). For each subgroup, adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline in each arm calculated from ANCOVA model adjusting for the following covariates/factors: treatment, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), Baseline CD4+ cell count, subgroup, and treatment and relevant subgroup interaction. For CD4+ cell count subgroup, Baseline CD4+ cell count group is included as a factor only.	Baseline (Day 1) and Week 96
Changes From Baseline in CD4+ Cell Counts at Week 144 by Subgroups	CD4+ cells are type of white blood cells that fight infection and as HIV infection progresses, the number of these cells declines. Blood samples were collected at specified time points to assess CD4+. It was evaluated by flow cytometry. Baseline value is the the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1). Change from Baseline was defined as value at the indicated time point minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented for subgroups (Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA, Baseline CD4+ cell count, Age group, Gender and race). For each subgroup, adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline in each arm calculated from ANCOVA model adjusting for the following covariates/factors: treatment, Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (factor), Baseline CD4+ cell count, subgroup, and treatment and relevant subgroup interaction. For CD4+ cell count subgroup, Baseline CD4+ cell count group is included as a factor only.	Baseline (Day 1) and Week 144
Change From Baseline in EuroQol - 5 Dimensions - 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Utility Score at Weeks 4, 24, 48	EQ-5D-5L questionnaire provides a profile of participant function and a global health state rating. The five-item measure has 1 question assessing each of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression and 5 levels for each dimension including 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. The health state is defined by combining the levels of answers from each of the 5 questions. Each health state is referred to in terms of a 5 digit code. Health state 5 digit code is translated into utility score, which is valued up to 1 (perfect health) with lower values meaning worse state. EQ-5D-5L utility score ranges from -0.281 to 1. Higher scores indicate better health. Baseline was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1) and change from Baseline=post-dose value minus Baseline value.	Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 24, 48
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Utility Score at Week 96	EQ-5D-5L questionnaire provides a profile of participant function and a global health state rating. The five-item measure has 1 question assessing each of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression and 5 levels for each dimension including 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. The health state is defined by combining the levels of answers from each of the 5 questions. Each health state is referred to in terms of a 5 digit code. Health state 5 digit code is translated into utility score, which is valued up to 1 (perfect health) with lower values meaning worse state. EQ-5D-5L utility score ranges from -0.281 to 1. Higher scores indicate better health. Baseline was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1) and change from Baseline=post-dose value minus Baseline value.	Baseline (Day 1) and Week 96
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Utility Score at Week 144	EQ-5D-5L questionnaire provides a profile of participant function and a global health state rating. The five-item measure has 1 question assessing each of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression and 5 levels for each dimension including 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. The health state is defined by combining the levels of answers from each of the 5 questions. Each health state is referred to in terms of a 5 digit code. Health state 5 digit code is translated into utility score, which is valued up to 1 (perfect health) with lower values meaning worse state. EQ-5D-5L utility score ranges from -0.281 to 1. Higher scores indicate better health. Baseline was the latest pre-dose assessment (Day 1) and change from Baseline=post-dose value minus Baseline value.	Baseline (Day 1) and Week 144
Change From Baseline in EuroQol - 5 Dimensions - 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Thermometer Scores at Weeks 4, 24 48	EQ-5D-5L questionnaire provides a profile of participant function and a global health state rating. The five-item measure has one question assessing each of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression and 5 levels for each dimension including 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. EQ-5D-5L included EQ visual Analogue scale (EQ VAS) 'Thermometer' which provided Self-rated current health status. Score ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). MMRM was run on the LOCF dataset, using the observed margins (OM) option. Baseline was the latest pre-dose assessment value (Day 1) and change from Baseline=post-dose value minus Baseline value.	Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 24, 48
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Thermometer Scores at Week 96	EQ-5D-5L questionnaire provided a profile of participant function and a global health state rating. The five-item measure has one question assessing each of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression and 5 levels for each dimension including 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. EQ-5D-5L included EQ visual Analogue scale (EQ VAS) 'Thermometer' which provided Self-rated current health status. Score ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). MMRM was run on the LOCF dataset, using the observed margins (OM) option. Baseline was the latest pre-dose assessment value (Day 1) and change from Baseline=post-dose value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented.	Baseline (Day 1) and Week 96
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Thermometer Scores at Week 144	EQ-5D-5L questionnaire provided a profile of participant function and a global health state rating. The five-item measure has one question assessing each of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression and 5 levels for each dimension including 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems. EQ-5D-5L included EQ visual Analogue scale (EQ VAS) 'Thermometer' which provided Self-rated current health status. Score ranges from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). MMRM was run on the LOCF dataset, using the observed margins (OM) option. Baseline was the latest pre-dose assessment value (Day 1) and change from Baseline=post-dose value minus Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error is presented.	Baseline (Day 1) and Week 144

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: ViiV Healthcare
• Collaborators: GlaxoSmithKline; PPD
• Investigators: Study Director: GSK Clinical Trials, ViiV Healthcare

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Cahn P, Madero JS, Arribas JR, Antinori A, Ortiz R, Clarke AE, Hung CC, Rockstroh JK, Girard PM, Sievers J, Man C, Currie A, Underwood M, Tenorio AR, Pappa K, Wynne B, Fettiplace A, Gartland M, Aboud M, Smith K; GEMINI Study Team. Dolutegravir plus lamivudine versus dolutegravir plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection (GEMINI-1 and GEMINI-2): week 48 results from two multicentre, double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2019 Jan 12;393(10167):143-155. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32462-0. Epub 2018 Nov 9. Erratum In: Lancet. 2018 Nov 28;:
• Ait-Khaled M, Sierra Madero J, Estrada V, Gulminetti R, Hagins D, Tsai HC, Man C, Sievers J, Grove R, Zolopa A, Wynne B, van Wyk J. Impact of treatment adherence on efficacy of dolutegravir plus lamivudine and dolutegravir plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine: pooled analysis of the GEMINI-1 and GEMINI-2 clinical studies. HIV Res Clin Pract. 2021 Dec 9;23(1):9-14. Epub 2021 Dec 16.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): July 21, 2016
• Primary Completion (Actual): March 29, 2018
• Study Completion (Actual): August 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: July 8, 2016
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 8, 2016
• First Posted (Estimated): July 13, 2016

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): August 24, 2023
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 1, 2023
• Last Verified: July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: tolerability; safety; efficacy; treatment naïve; non inferiority; HIV 1; dolutegravir plus lamivudine; dolutegravir plus tenofovir/emtricitabine
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pathologic Processes; RNA Virus Infections; Virus Diseases; Blood-Borne Infections; Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral; Sexually Transmitted Diseases; Lentivirus Infections; Retroviridae Infections; Immune System Diseases; Disease Attributes; Slow Virus Diseases; Urogenital Diseases; Genital Diseases; HIV Infections; Infections; Communicable Diseases; Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes; Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action; Anti-Infective Agents; Antiviral Agents; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors; Enzyme Inhibitors; Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Retroviral Agents; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; Integrase Inhibitors; Tenofovir; Emtricitabine; Lamivudine; Dolutegravir
• Other Study ID Numbers: 204861; 2015-004418-95 (EudraCT Number)