Cabergoline Versus Calcium Gluconate Infusion in the Prevention of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome

December 25, 2018 updated by: Prof .Usama M.Fouda, Aljazeera Hospital

Cabergoline Versus Calcium Gluconate Infusion in the Prevention of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome. A Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of calcium gluconate infusion versus cabergoline in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in patients pretreated with GnRH agonist long protocol who are at high risk for OHSS.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a serious complication of assisted reproduction.

Previous studies revealed that calcium gluconate infusion reduced the risk of OHSS. Other studies revealed that cabergoline (potent dopamine receptor agonist on D2 receptors)was effective in preventing OHSS.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of calcium gluconate infusion versus cabergoline in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in patients pretreated with GnRH agonist long protocol who are at high risk for OHSS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

170

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Giza, Egypt
        • Aljazeera Hospital
      • Giza, Egypt
        • Riyadh Fertility and Reproductive Health center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 37 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are stimulated using the long luteal GnRH agonist protocol and at high risk for developing OHSS [have more than 18 follicles (> 11mm) and serum estradiol ≥ 3000 pg/ml on the day of HCG administration].

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fibrosis of lung
  • Swelling or inflammation around the heart or lung
  • Hypertension
  • Liver disease
  • Heart valve disease and allergy to cabergoline or ergot derivatives.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cabergoline group
Cabergoline is administered starting on the day of HCG administration.
Cabergoline (Dostinex; Pfizer, Italy) at a daily dose of 0.5 mg is administered orally at bed time for 8 days starting on the day of HCG administration
Experimental: Calcium gluconate infusion group
Calcium gluconate is administered starting on the day of HCG administration.
Intravenous 10% calcium gluconate, 10 mL in 200 mL of physiologic saline on the day of ovum pickup, day 1, day 2, and day 3 after ovum pickup. Intravenous infusion will be performed within 30 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
Time Frame: Within 4 weeks of HCG adminstration
Within 4 weeks of HCG adminstration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The Number of Participants Who Achieved Ongoing Pregnancy
Time Frame: 18 weeks after embryo transfer
18 weeks after embryo transfer

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Usama M Fouda, M.D,PhD, Aljazeera( Al Gazeera) hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 18, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

August 23, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 27, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 25, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on OHSS

Clinical Trials on Cabergoline

Subscribe