Virtual vs. Traditional Physical Therapy Following Total Knee Replacement

October 26, 2021 updated by: Duke University

Virtual Exercise Rehabilitation In-home Therapy: A Randomized Study (VERITAS)

The goals of this research study are the following:

  1. To compare the effects of tele-rehabilitation-supported physical therapy versus traditional home and/or clinic-based physical therapy for total knee replacement (TKR) on 90-day health service use costs.
  2. To compare tele-rehabilitation-supported physical therapy and traditional physical therapy on patient-centered outcomes
  3. To explore whether individual patient characteristics are associated with differential improvement from 6 to 12 weeks assessed by patient-reported outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will compare the effects on health service use costs of tele-rehabilitation-supported physical therapy versus traditional home and/or clinic-based physical therapy following total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. It will also examine standard post-surgical clinical measures to confirm non-inferiority of outcomes between groups. A total of 300 patients will receive standard pre- and post-surgical medical care from their healthcare providers, and be randomized to receive pre-surgery rehabilitation exercises ("pre-hab") and post-discharge physical therapy provided via either a home-based tele-rehabilitation platform (intervention group, n=150) or home-health and clinic-based physical therapy regimen (control group, n=150). Data will be collected by sites at enrollment, baseline, hospital discharge, and 6 weeks following surgery. Patients will complete telephone surveys regarding their health and knee function at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months after surgery. Patients will also keep a diary from hospital discharge through 3 months documenting healthcare utilization and progress toward a personal recovery goal. Diary information will be collected over the phone concurrently with administration of the 6-week and 3-month surveys. The episode for analysis will be from surgery through 3 months post-discharge, in alignment with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) bundled payment model. Physical risks or benefits to patients for participating in this study are as expected from standard pre- and post-surgical physical therapy associated with total knee replacement surgery. The low risk of loss of confidentiality for all subjects will be minimized using appropriate safeguards.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

306

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27514
        • University of North Carolina Orhthopedics
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Duke Orthopaedics
      • Greensboro, North Carolina, United States, 27408
        • Greensboro Orthopedics
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27612
        • Raleigh Orthopaedics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ≥ 18 years of age
  2. Scheduled to have a non-traumatic TKR
  3. Can be enrolled a minimum of 10 days prior to surgery (in-person visit)
  4. Have a Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) score of ≥ 6 indicating expected discharge home after surgical hospitalization

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent, including but not limited to cognitive or language barriers (comprehension)
  2. Scheduled for staged bilateral TKR
  3. Living in a nursing home prior to surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Virtual physical therapy
Virtual physical therapy rehabilitation program (VERA) used in the home with care planning and remote support and monitoring by physical therapists
Virtual Exercise Rehabilitation Assistant (VERA), a virtual physical therapy delivery system installed in patient's home
OTHER: Traditional physical therapy
No intervention. Standard home health physical therapy and/or outpatient clinic physical therapy as prescribed.
Traditional physical therapy delivered in clinic or via home-health visits

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cost Difference in US Dollars
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Difference in total health service use costs at 12-weeks postoperative between patients who receive tele-rehab-supported PT versus traditional home and/or clinic-based PT for TKR.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 12 weeks
Survey regarding health [Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)] for pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, function in sports and recreation, and knee-related quality of life (QOL) at 6 weeks and 12 weeks, scored from 0 to 100. Higher score indicates better outcomes.
6 weeks and 12 weeks
Range of Motion
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Knee range of motion [lower (extension) and upper range of motion (flexion)] at 6 weeks
6 weeks
10-meter Gait Speed
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Gait speed 6 weeks after surgery
6 weeks
Pain Score
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Non-inferiority safety endpoint: pain score at 12 weeks. Measured on scale from 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain imaginable.
12 weeks
Report of Falls
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Any fall reported between hospital discharge and 12-week follow-up (yes/no)
12 weeks
Re-hospitalization
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Re-hospitalizations since hospital discharge (total count)
12 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Sub-domain Scores
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 12 weeks
Scores in KOOS sub-domains of pain, symptoms, activities of daily living (ADL), sports and recreation, and quality of life (QOL). Each sub-domain score can be normalized to values ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores denote better outcomes.
6 weeks and 12 weeks
Physical Activity
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 12 weeks
Physical activity (duration of moderate exercise in total minutes per week)
6 weeks and 12 weeks
Return to Work
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 12 weeks
Return to work (yes, modified schedule, or no) for those who stopped working prior to surgery
6 weeks and 12 weeks
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Mental Health (MH) Score
Time Frame: 12 weeks
PROMIS mental health score at 12 weeks, on a scale of 0 to 20 with higher scores indicating better mental health.
12 weeks
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Physical Health (PH) Score
Time Frame: 12 weeks
PROMIS physical health score at 12 weeks, on a scale of 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating better physical health.
12 weeks
Satisfaction With Physical Function
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Score on Satisfaction with Physical Function questionnaire through 12 weeks after surgery, on a scale of 0 to 6, with 6 being higher satisfaction.
12 weeks
Satisfaction With Tele-rehab Platform
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Satisfaction with tele-rehab platform, on scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being highly satisfied.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Janet Bettger, ScD, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke Dept of Orthopaedic Surgery

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe