- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02950727
Comparing Stability and Cost-Effectiveness of 3 Bicortical Screws Vs Adjustable Plate and 2 Bicortical Screws in Fixation of BSSRO
Stability of Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy (BSSRO) Using Adjustable Mandibular Plates in Adjunction With Bicortical Screws Versus Traditional Positional Screws for Antero-posterior Mandibular Deficient Patients
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Trauner and Obwegeser in 1957, reported the first correction of jaw deformity by the sagittal split technique.
Dal Pont in 1961, a student of Obwegeser, made a modification to the latter technique, to further enhance the precision and the accuracy of movement of both proximal distal segments his technique has become widely publicized. He changed the lower horizontal cut to a vertical cut on the buccal cortex between the first and second molars, there by obtaining broader bony contact.
Hunsuck in 1968, modified the technique, to decrease the soft tissue dissection; he advocated a shorter horizontal medial cut.
Epker in 1977, modified the technique in several ways to decrease swelling, manipulation to the neurovascular bundle and hemorrhage, his modification included minimal stripping of the masseter muscle and medial dissection.
BSSRO is now the most common procedure used to advance the mandible is a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
There are many different methods of mandibular fixation such as using intra osseous wiring combined with inter maxillary fixation (IMF) which showed significant amount of relapse and patient dissatisfaction, this is called nonrigid fixation. Another type of mandibular fixation is the three point fixation using positioning screws called rigid fixation. Rigid internal fixation was introduced in 1976 by Spiessel to promote healing, restore early function, and decrease relapse. The introduction of an internal rigid fixation method, instead of 5-6 week intermaxillary fixation, had the added benefit of shorter periods of hospital stay and patient convenience.' Minimal or no immobilization of the jaws allows patients to function sooner, resume their daily activities, and return to work earlier. In a relatively short period of time, the use of rigid fixation of bony segments in orthognathic surgery had become a standard of care.
A major concern in the surgical correction of a anteroposterior mandibular deficient patients is potential postsurgical relapse.
Clinical studies have shown a wide array of successful techniques used to fix segments. Three bicortical screws placed in an inverted-L fashion has become the gold standard for stabilizing a bilateral sagittal split advancement. Various problems emerged, however, showing that the stability necessary for the stabilization of an osteotomy site cannot be directly compared with that of a fracture. Other problems encountered were difficulties in positioning the fragments in new sites, which resulted in malposition of the condyle. This led to the term 'immediate postoperative relapse'. In addition, pain and dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) complicated the treatment and made the target of long-term stability difficult to achieve.
In this current study a comparison between 3 positional screws in comparison with the adjustable plate in conjunction with 2 positional screws will be used in a group of patients suffering from retrognathia and will be treated by BSSRO, thus the investigators are using the advantage of the inherent adjustability of the plate intraoperatively with the good fixation and the stability inherent in the bicortical screws short term stability. This will be evaluated both clinically and cephalometrically.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients suffering from mandibular retrognathia (anteroposterior deficient mandible)
- Patients should be free from any systemic disease that may affect normal healing, and predictable outcome
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with any systemic disease that may affect normal healing
- Intra-bony lesions or infections that may retard the osteotomy healing
- Uncooperative Patient with bad oral hygiene
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: 3 bicortical screw
1st group:3 bicortical screws will be used to fix the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
|
after mandibular bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy surgery is performed in the first group the osteotomy will be fixed using 3 bicortical screws
|
Active Comparator: adjustable plate and 2 bicortical screws
adjustable plate and 2 bicortical screws will be used to fix the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
|
after mandibular bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy surgery is performed in the second group the osteotomy will be fixed using adjustable plate and 2 bicortical screws
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
cephalometric analysis to measure angles(degrees)
Time Frame: (an xray preoperative, immediate postoperative, 6 weeks and 6 months)
|
(an xray preoperative, immediate postoperative, 6 weeks and 6 months)
|
cephalometric analysis to measure lines(mm)
Time Frame: (an xray preoperative, immediate postoperative, 6 weeks and 6 months)
|
(an xray preoperative, immediate postoperative, 6 weeks and 6 months)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
operation time in minutes
Time Frame: intraoperative timing during surgery
|
intraoperative timing during surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Van Sickels JE, Peterson GP, Holms S, Haug RH. An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Nov;63(11):1620-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.06.008.
- Joos U. An adjustable bone fixation system for sagittal split ramus osteotomy: preliminary report. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 Apr;37(2):99-103. doi: 10.1054/bjom.1997.0081.
- Peterson GP, Haug RH, Van Sickels J. A biomechanical evaluation of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Sep;63(9):1317-24. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.05.301.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 15-0769-F3R
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mandibular Hypoplasia
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownMandibular Hypoplasia | Mandibular RetrognathismEgypt
-
Universidade do Vale do SapucaiCompletedMandibular Hypoplasia
-
Kenneth BeerAllerganUnknownMandibular HypoplasiaUnited States
-
University Hospital, MontpellierRecruiting
-
Max Domingues PereiraFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloCompletedMaxillary HypoplasiaBrazil
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedPilot Study to Determine the Optimal Negative Pressure for Non-invasive Breast Augmentation in WomenBreast HypoplasiaKorea, Republic of
-
Universitair Ziekenhuis BrusselUnknown
-
Aalborg University HospitalRecruiting
-
University of PaviaEnrolling by invitationEvaluation of Masticatory Muscle Activity in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Rapid Maxillary ExpansionMaxillar HypoplasiaItaly
-
Ankara UniversityCompletedIntubation | Retrognathia | Maxillary Hypoplasia | TomographyTurkey
Clinical Trials on 3 bicortical screws
-
Second Hospital of Jilin UniversityUnknown
-
Peking University Third HospitalRecruitingFemoral Neck Fractures | Internal FixationChina
-
Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical UniversityUnknownLumbar Disc Herniation | Intervertebral Disc Degeneration | Spinal Stenosis LumbarChina
-
Karolinska InstitutetKarolinska University HospitalActive, not recruitingScoliosis | KyphosisSweden
-
Christiana Care Health ServicesTerminatedMandible FractureUnited States
-
King Abdullah International Medical Research CenterUnknownPedicle Screws | Surgery, Computer-Assisted/Adverse Effects | Bone Screws | Imaging, Three-Dimensional/MethodsSaudi Arabia
-
Technical University of MunichNot yet recruiting
-
Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical UniversityUnknownPosterior Short-segment Pedicle InstrumentationChina
-
Central South UniversityRejoin Hangzhou Martins Medical Equipment Co., Ltd.UnknownPEEK Interference Screw; Fixation; Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionChina
-
Peking University Third HospitalNot yet recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture