Absorbable Interface Screw Clinical Trial

June 20, 2022 updated by: Peking University Third Hospital

Absorbable Interface Screw Clinical Trial - PUTH & NANTON

Validation of the safety and efficacy of absorbable interface screws for clinical use

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Interface screws are divided into metal screws and absorbable screws. Since metal screws cut tendon grafts, absorbable interface screws are now mostly selected. At present, the materials of absorbable screws are mainly polylactic acid and polyglycolide. The test product is composed of two kinds of polylactic acid and bioactive glass fiber, which can reduce the adverse stimulation to the surrounding bone, promote the absorption of the screw and the bone grow into.Estimated enrollment for 4 months, follow-up for 14 months, a total of 18 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

86

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ① Before surgery, subjects or guardians are willing and able to sign the informed consent;

    • Patients aged 18 to 80 (including 18 and 80 years old), regardless of gender;

      • Patients who meet the diagnostic criteria for anterior cruciate ligament rupture of the knee joint and have no contraindications to implantation;

        • The patient's bones are mature;

          • Good compliance, willing and able to conduct follow-up observation as required.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ① Subjects who have participated in other clinical studies of drugs, biological agents or medical devices before being selected and did not reach the primary study endpoint;

    • The patient is known to have a history of allergy to one or more implanted materials;

      • Those who are physically weak or cannot tolerate surgery due to other diseases of the body;

        • Active infection in the knee joint or other parts of the body; ⑤ Those with other ligament injury and/or meniscus injury in the affected knee joint; ⑥ Those who need to perform simultaneous meniscus repair and other surgeries on the ipsilateral knee joint; ⑦ Obese BMI>35;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Absorbable screw (Natong Biotechnology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.)
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction uses absorbable interface screws manufactured by Natong Biotechnology.
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction uses absorbable interface screws manufactured by Natong Biotechnology.
Active Comparator: Absorbable screw (Inion Oy, INION, Finland)
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction uses absorbable interface screws manufactured by INION.
Reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament using Inion Oy absorbable interface scews from INION, Finland

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lysholm score
Time Frame: Asked as baseline data before surgery.

An instrument used to assess the results of rehabilitation from knee injuries, especially those requiring ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION. It measures recovery of knee joint function based on ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING.

Year introduced: 2015 Patients will be asked to fill out the Lysholm score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Asked as baseline data before surgery.
Lysholm score
Time Frame: At 6 months after surgery.

An instrument used to assess the results of rehabilitation from knee injuries, especially those requiring ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION. It measures recovery of knee joint function based on ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING.

Year introduced: 2015 Patients will be asked to fill out the Lysholm score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

At 6 months after surgery.
Lysholm score
Time Frame: At 9 months after surgery.

An instrument used to assess the results of rehabilitation from knee injuries, especially those requiring ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION. It measures recovery of knee joint function based on ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING.

Year introduced: 2015 Patients will be asked to fill out the Lysholm score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

At 9 months after surgery.
Lysholm score
Time Frame: At 14 months after surgery.

An instrument used to assess the results of rehabilitation from knee injuries, especially those requiring ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION. It measures recovery of knee joint function based on ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING.

Year introduced: 2015 Patients will be asked to fill out the Lysholm score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

At 14 months after surgery.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The upper, middle and lower diameters of the tibial bone tunnel
Time Frame: Preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, 9 months postoperatively, and 14 months postoperatively.
The tunnel widening of the experimental group was measured compared with that of the control group.
Preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, 9 months postoperatively, and 14 months postoperatively.
Relative tibial anterior displacement
Time Frame: Preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, 9 months postoperatively, and 14 months postoperatively.
To compare whether the absorbable interface screws in the experimental group can effectively limit the anterior displacement of the tibia relative to the femur.
Preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, 9 months postoperatively, and 14 months postoperatively.
Range of motion (ROM)
Time Frame: Preoperatively.
Assessing active and passive flexion-extension angles after anterior cruciate ligament surgery
Preoperatively.
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form 2000.
Time Frame: Asked as baseline data before surgery.
Currently, there are internationally recognized scales with reliability, validity and sensitivity for the assessment of anterior cruciate ligament injury and rupture. Subjective and objective symptoms of the knee joint were comprehensively assessed.
Asked as baseline data before surgery.
Tegner score
Time Frame: Asked as baseline data before surgery.
Patients will be asked to fill out the Tegner score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 10. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Asked as baseline data before surgery.
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form 2000
Time Frame: At 6 months after surgery.
Currently, there are internationally recognized scales with reliability, validity and sensitivity for the assessment of anterior cruciate ligament injury and rupture. Subjective and objective symptoms of the knee joint were comprehensively assessed.
At 6 months after surgery.
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form 2000
Time Frame: At 9 months after surgery.
Currently, there are internationally recognized scales with reliability, validity and sensitivity for the assessment of anterior cruciate ligament injury and rupture. Subjective and objective symptoms of the knee joint were comprehensively assessed.
At 9 months after surgery.
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form 2000
Time Frame: At 14 months after surgery.
Currently, there are internationally recognized scales with reliability, validity and sensitivity for the assessment of anterior cruciate ligament injury and rupture. Subjective and objective symptoms of the knee joint were comprehensively assessed.
At 14 months after surgery.
Tegner score
Time Frame: At 6 months after surgery.
Patients will be asked to fill out the Tegner score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 10. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
At 6 months after surgery.
Tegner score
Time Frame: At 9 months after surgery.
Patients will be asked to fill out the Tegner score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 10. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
At 9 months after surgery.
Tegner score
Time Frame: At 14 months after surgery.
Patients will be asked to fill out the Tegner score to document the functional status. The minimum is 0 and the maximum value is 10. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
At 14 months after surgery.
Relative tibial anterior displacement
Time Frame: At 6 months postoperatively.
To compare whether the absorbable interface screws in the experimental group
At 6 months postoperatively.
Relative tibial anterior displacement
Time Frame: At 9 months postoperatively.
To compare whether the absorbable interface screws in the experimental group
At 9 months postoperatively.
Relative tibial anterior displacement
Time Frame: At 14 months postoperatively.
To compare whether the absorbable interface screws in the experimental group
At 14 months postoperatively.
Range of motion (ROM)
Time Frame: At 6 months postoperatively.
Assessing active and passive flexion-extension angles after anterior cruciate ligament surgery
At 6 months postoperatively.
Range of motion (ROM)
Time Frame: At 9 months postoperatively.
Assessing active and passive flexion-extension angles after anterior cruciate ligament surgery
At 9 months postoperatively.
Range of motion (ROM)
Time Frame: At 14 months postoperatively.
Assessing active and passive flexion-extension angles after anterior cruciate ligament surgery
At 14 months postoperatively.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

July 30, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 24, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 24, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00006761-D2022055

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

Clinical Trials on Absorbable interface screws manufactured by Natong Biotechnology

Subscribe