Low-level Light Therapy for Overactive Bladder and Urinary Incontinence

December 5, 2016 updated by: Seoul National University Hospital

Double-blind, Randomized, Shame-controlled Multicenter Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Low-level Light Therapy Device(Color DNA-WSF) for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder and Urinary Incontinence in Women

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a self-therapeutic approach of skin adhesive low-level light therapy (LLLT) in females with Overactive Bladder (OAB) and Urinary Incontinence (UI)

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study design: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centered trial carried out at two university hospitals. This clinical trial was approved by the Korea Food and Drug Administration and the Institutional Review Boards of the two hospitals.

Study process:

All patients gave informed written consent after being informed of the details of the study. Participants were randomized into either the LLLT or placebo control groups at the third visit. All participants underwent demographic and history taking, a physical examination, bladder examination and laboratory tests. All participants were educated on how to use the device by demonstration and a picture-guided user manual.

During the second visit, the participants conducted a self-evaluation of frequency of urgency urinary incontinence episode using the OABSS scale and underwent urine examination (pre-treatment measurement). The third visit occurred 7 days from the date of the second visit, and a clinical primary nurse described how to use the medical equipment and devices when they were at home. All subjects filled out self-reported diary and filled out UDI-6 and IIQ-7 questionnaires in each visit. Subjects carried out the self-treatment in the same way at home 3 times a day for 12 weeks and then visited the hospital at week 4 and 12 to undergo examination and filled out OABSS, UDI-6 and IIQ-7 questionnaires (post-treatment measurement).

Statistical analysis:

All data are summarized as means ± standard deviation or as numbers with proportions. A p < 0.05 was considered to indicate significance. The investigator decided that the therapeutic effect would be a > 20% reduction in the frequency of urgency urinary incontinence episodes after treatment. The statistical analysis was conducted using the self-reported micturition diary after the 12 week visit as the primary endpoint. The investigator used an independent t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test depending on the normality of the data to evaluate differences in each group between frequency of urgency urinary incontinence episodes measured after the 12 week visit and baseline values. To test for normality, the investigator performed Shapiro-Wilk's test. The examination of the ratio difference in nominal variable was carried out using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. A per-protocol (PP) and intent to treat (ITT) analyses were used in our clinical trial to assess efficacy and safety. A Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used for ITT analysis missing data.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 07985
        • Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital
    • Kyeonggi-do
      • Seongnam-si, Kyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 13620
        • Seoul National Univesity Bundang Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of overactive bladder or urinary incontinence

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of taking medication for urgency urinary incontinence,

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: LLLT group
Low-level light therapy (LLLT) was self-performed for 12 weeks, 3 times a day for 20 minutes each
we used a skin-adhesive LLLT device called the Color DNA-WSF (Color Seven Co., Seoul, Korea) which consists of body for power supply and two microprocessor-controlled light-emitting diodes. We selected two acupuncture points, conception vessel 4 (CV4; Guanyuan) and CV6 (Qihai), for treating overactive bladder. The participants attached the skin-adhesive LLLT device probes to both acupuncture points according to treatment schedule.
Other Names:
  • Color DNA-WSF
Placebo Comparator: Placebo-controlled group
Placebo low-level light therapy (LLLT) was self-performed for 12 weeks, 3 times a day for 20 minutes each. The placebo LLLT device was identical to the active device but did not radiate light as the hole was blocked.
we used a placebo skin-adhesive LLLT device called the Color DNA-WSF (Color Seven Co., Seoul, Korea) which consists of body for power supply and two microprocessor-controlled light-emitting diodes. We selected two acupuncture points, conception vessel 4 (CV4; Guanyuan) and CV6 (Qihai), for treating overactive bladder. The participants attached the placebo skin-adhesive LLLT device probes to both acupuncture points according to treatment schedule.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency of urinary incontinence episode
Time Frame: within 12 weeks after treatment
The primary outcome was frequency of urgency urinary incontinence episode based on the self-evaluated micturition diary measuring the difference between urgency urinary incontinence episode count pre and post-treatment. Urgency urinary incontinence episode was measured by the mean of 3 days report prior to the visit (week 0, 4 and 12). The higher values represent a worse outcome. All data collected by self-reported sheet. The participants conducted a self-evaluation of frequency of urgency urinary incontinence episode from 3 days prior to the visits and submitted to the investigator.
within 12 weeks after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Quality of life
Time Frame: within 12 weeks after treatment
The secondary outcome measures was quality of life, assessed by UDI-6 and IIQ-7. The UDI-6 descriptive system comprises the following 6 dimensions: bladder stimulation (2), stress-related urinary incontinence (2), obstructive disorder and pain. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. The subscales combined to compute a total score according to UDI-6 equation formula. The higher values represent a worse outcome. The IIQ-7 descriptive system comprises the following 7 dimensions: physical activity (2), travelling (2), social activity and psychological effect (2). Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems, and the score was calculated by multiplying 33 to the score (maximum 100). The subscales combined to compute a total score according to IIQ-7 equation formula.
within 12 weeks after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yong Beom Kim, Professor, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

December 2, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 7, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Overactive Bladder

Clinical Trials on Low-level light therapy

Subscribe