Use of Ultrasound Guidance to Assist With Labor Epidural Placement in Patients With a BMI ≥40

June 13, 2018 updated by: Thomas J. Vernon
Placement of labor epidurals is a very common daily practice in obstetrical anesthesia. Currently, these epidurals are placed based upon palpation of landmarks to determine midline and the correct spinal level for placement. Palpation of these landmarks can be difficult, however, particularly in morbidly obese patients who have significant amounts of soft tissue overlying them. This study seeks to use ultrasound guidance to examine the spine prior to epidural placement, and see what effects this has compared to palpation alone with respect to procedure time, number of attempts, success rate in the first attempt, failure rate, complication rate, patient anxiety levels, and patient satisfaction levels.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
        • Magee Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Current (pregnant) BMI ≥ 40
  • Age ≥ 18
  • ASA score of 3 or less
  • Full term pregnancy (37 weeks gestational age or greater)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known scoliosis
  • Known contraindications to neuraxial blockade
  • Intrauterine fetal demise or non-viable fetus.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Ultrasound Group
The interventional group that will have their spine evaluated by ultrasound prior to epidural placement
Using ultrasound guidance to evaluate the spine prior to epidural placement
OTHER: Palpation Group
The control group that will have their epidural placed in the usual fashion based on palpation
Using palpation only to evaluate the spine prior to epidural placement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Time Required for Epidural Catheter Placement
Time Frame: Assessed immediately during epidural catheter placement
Includes the time required to evaluate the spine (via ultrasound or palpation) plus the time required to successfully place the epidural catheter
Assessed immediately during epidural catheter placement

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Epidural Procedure Time
Time Frame: Assessed immediately during epidural catheter placement
Time required to successfully place the epidural catheter
Assessed immediately during epidural catheter placement
Number of Attempts at Epidural Catheter Placement
Time Frame: Assessed immediately during epidural catheter placement
Assessed immediately during epidural catheter placement
Number of Participants Who Had Successful Placement of the Epidural Catheter in the First Attempt
Time Frame: Assessed immediately during epidural catheter placement
Assessed immediately during epidural catheter placement
Complications
Time Frame: Assessed immediately during epidural catheter placement and within 24 hours after delivery
Any epidural related complication noted to occur including a failed epidural, inadvertent dural puncture, or paresthesia will be documented and reported.
Assessed immediately during epidural catheter placement and within 24 hours after delivery
Epidural Failure Rate
Time Frame: Assessed within 24 hours after delivery
Any epidural catheter that fails to provide appropriate analgesia requiring them to be replaced with a new epidural catheter will be documented and reported
Assessed within 24 hours after delivery
Epidural Catheter Placement Satisfaction Level
Time Frame: Assessed immediately following epidural catheter placement
Immediately following epidural catheter placement, patients will be asked to rate their satisfaction level during the procedure on a 0-10 scale, with 0 being not at all satisfied, and 10 being extremely satisfied.
Assessed immediately following epidural catheter placement
Patient Anxiety Level
Time Frame: Assessed immediately following epidural catheter placement
Immediately following epidural catheter placement, patients will be asked to rate their anxiety level during the procedure on a 0-10 scale, where 0 is no anxiety at all, and 10 is the worst anxiety imaginable.
Assessed immediately following epidural catheter placement
Palpation or Ultrasound Time
Time Frame: Assessed immediately prior to epidural catheter placement
The time taken to evaluate the spine, either by palpation or ultrasound guidance, and mark the location for epidural catheter insertion
Assessed immediately prior to epidural catheter placement
Overall Anesthesia Experience Satisfaction
Time Frame: Measured within 24 hours of delivery
Within 24 hours after delivery, patients will be given a 13 question survey. The survey is a modified Woman's Views of Birth Labor Satisfaction Questionnaire (WOMBLSQ) which asks patients to rate 13 various satisfaction related statements on a 1-7 scale, with 1 being totally disagree, 4 being neither agree nor disagree, and 7 being totally agree. Each of the 13 questions asked are designed to assess their overall satisfaction with their epidural catheter placement and overall anesthesia care. The total score is reported combining all 13 questions for a possible score range of 13-91. A higher total score indicates a higher overall anesthesia experience satisfaction level. No subscales were used.
Measured within 24 hours of delivery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 15, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 15, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 6, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 11, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OBUS1123

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe