The Effect of Antihypertensive Medication Timing on Morbidity and Mortality

August 23, 2024 updated by: University of Alberta

The Effect of Antihypertensive Medication Timing on Morbidity and Mortality: The "BedMed" RCT

High blood pressure is common and its presence increases the risk of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity (most notably stroke, myocardial infarction, and congestive heart failure). Given blood pressure is normally higher during the day than it is overnight, blood pressure lowering medications are traditionally taken in the morning. However a randomized trial of 2156 Spanish hypertension patients published in 2010 ("MAPEC"), suggests a large (61%) reduction in mortality and cardiovascular morbidity if such medications are instead taken at bedtime. This degree of benefit far exceeds other established methods of cardiovascular risk reduction - and such a surprisingly large effect requires independent confirmation for practice to change. BedMed is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial facilitated by over 400 Canadian family physician members of the Pragmatic Trials Collaborative. During the conduct of this trial consenting hypertensive primary care patients, already established on one or more antihypertensive medications, will be randomized to either morning or bedtime antihypertensive use. Patient oriented trial outcomes evaluating both potential benefits and harms will be drawn largely from administrative health data that is routinely collected on all residents of Canada's publicly funded health care system. This trial is being conducted in 5 Canadian provinces and will continue to collect data until late 2023, at which point more than 255 primary outcome events are anticipated.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

THE OPPORTUNITY BEDTIME PRESCRIBING MIGHT PROVIDE: Blood pressure normally exhibits a circadian rhythm with relatively lower pressures during sleep.(Ref 1) Lack of this sleep time "dip" correlates strongly with adverse cardiovascular events and BP correlates most strongly with such events when measured at night (i.e. during sleep).(Ref 2-5) Motivated by such observations, Spanish researchers studied the effect of taking BP medication at BEDTIME (when the effect on nighttime BP would be greatest) versus conventional morning use, when most BP medications are taken. The results of this study (the MAPEC trial) were striking.(Ref 6) Over a median 5.6 years follow-up, adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 187 of 1084 subjects taking BP medication in the morning but only 68 of 1072 subjects who took their BP medication at bedtime (relative risk 0.39, 95%CI [0.29-0.51], p < 0.001). This 61% reduction in adverse events was similar for all individual components of the primary outcome (including death from all causes, stroke, MI, new angina pectoris, CHF and retinal artery occlusions). If true, a switch to bedtime prescribing would have more impact on the health of hypertensive patients than whether high BP is treated at all. However extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - independent replication of such surprising findings is needed for widespread practice change to occur.

BEDMED: The BedMed trial is a pragmatic primary care trial intended to verify whether bedtime antihypertensive use, as compared to conventional morning use, reduces major adverse cardiovascular events. It is designed as an adaptive randomized registry trial within community primary care and draws both trial outcomes and baseline covariates from provincial administrative claims data (vital statistics, hospital separations, physician services, prescription dispenses, laboratory data). BedMed is government funded/facilitated, and has over 400 volunteer primary care providers recruiting participants in 5 Canadian provinces (Alberta, British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and Ontario). It was originally intended that the trial would continue until 406 primary outcome events were observed, however funding will expire before this occurs. As a result, BedMed will continue to recruit participants until early 2022 and complete data collection in late 2023, at which time more than 255 primary outcome events are anticipated (based on blinded observation of total events gathered at the end of 2021). The trial relies heavily on a collaboration between the volunteer family physicians of the Pragmatic Trials Collaborative (www.PragmaticTrials.ca) who will recruit for the trial and the Alberta SPOR Support Unit's Data Platform - which will facilitate accessing and analyzing the relevant administrative databases from multiple provinces (http://www.aihealthsolutions.ca/initiatives-partnerships/spor/).

DIURETIC SUB-STUDY: The "adaptive" element of the BedMed trial design refers to an interim examination of bedtime diuretic tolerance. Although it is commonly believed that diuretics can't be taken at bedtime without inducing unwanted nocturia, the sparse evidence in the literature suggests this may not be the case.(Ref 7,8) Rather than excluding patients whose only medication is a diuretic the investigators will instead initially include such patients and evaluate bedtime diuretic tolerance early on in the trial to determine whether or not such patients should continue to be enrolled. Specifically, upon allocating to bedtime dosing 203 patients whose only BP medication is an AM diuretic, the investigators will analyze 6-week compliance to bedtime allocation for all participants with a single morning BP medication (of all types). If diuretic compliance is worse, the "adaptive" trial design will exclude enrolment of additional patients whose only BP medication is a diuretic. The BedMed investigators will report on bedtime diuretic tolerance separate from (and in advance of) the main BedMed analysis.

INTERIM SAFETY ANALYSIS: An independent data safety monitoring board (DSMB) organized and chaired by Jim Wright (Cochrane Hypertension Review Group Coordinating Editor) is expected to review all data in March 2022, at which time approximately 150-160 primary outcome events are expected. If p is ≤ 0.001 for benefit (the Haybittle-Peto boundary - recommended to reduce the chance of stopping too early and magnifying benefit), or if p is ≤ 0.05 for harm, the DSMB will apply clinical judgement and make recommendations to the steering committee on whether the trial should stop early.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3357

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2T4
        • University of Alberta
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6T 1Z4
        • University of British Columbia
    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3T 2N2
        • University of Manitoba
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 1A1
        • University of Toronto
    • Saskatchewan
      • Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, S7N 5A2
        • University of Saskatchewan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Hypertension diagnosis as assigned by a physician or nurse practitioner
  2. ≥ 1 blood pressure medication taken once daily, or primary care provider willing to convert ≥ 1 blood pressure medication to once daily
  3. Community dwelling (i.e. not residing in a nursing home; assisted living permitted)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Palliative (as per primary care provider's judgement)
  2. Unable to provide informed consent (as per primary care provider's judgement)
  3. Personal history of glaucoma or use of glaucoma medications
  4. Sleep disrupting shift work (more than 3 shifts/month during participant's regular sleeping hours)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Bedtime BP Meds
Use of blood pressure lowering medication at bedtime
Blood pressure lowering medications will be switched (one at a time as tolerated) to bedtime, or maintained at bedtime if already taken at that time. All decisions related to which, and how many, medications to switch are at the discretion of the care provider.
Active Comparator: Morning BP Meds
Use of blood pressure lowering medication in the morning
Blood pressure lowering medications will be switched (one at a time as tolerated) to morning, or maintained in the morning if already taken at that time. All decisions related to which, and how many, medications to switch are at the discretion of the care provider.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 years
First occurrence of either death (all-cause), or hospitalization or emergency department visit for acute coronary syndrome / MI, congestive heart failure, or stroke.
Through study completion, an average of 4 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Death from any cause.
Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Acute coronary syndrome
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Hospitalization or ER visit for acute coronary syndrome or MI.
Through study completion, an average of 4 years
CHF Hospitalization
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Hospitalization or ER visit for congestive heart failure.
Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Stoke
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Hospitalization or ER visit for stroke (excludes TIA).
Through study completion, an average of 4 years
All-cause hospitalization
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Hospitalization or ER visit for any cause
Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Long term care admission
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Newly admitted to a nursing home or assisted living facility as primary residence
Through study completion, an average of 4 years
New glaucoma diagnosis
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 years
First-ever glaucoma diagnosis
Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Non-vertebral fracture
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Fracture of any bone other than the vertebra of the back or neck
Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Cognitive decline
Time Frame: 18 months
Cognitive performance worsening by 2 or more points compared to baseline, as measured by the Short Blessed Test
18 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acute care costs
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Acute care costs (derived from each admission's resource intensity weight and length of stay)
Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Total cost of care
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Acute care costs + medication costs + physician billings
Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Self-reported Overall Health Score
Time Frame: 1 year
As measured by the EQ-5D-5L
1 year
Light-headedness
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Self-reported light-headedness or feeling "faint" without loss or consciousness in the prior month - yes / no. (Asked at 6-weeks, 6 months, and every 6 months)
Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Syncope
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Self-reported fainting (loss of consciousness) in the prior month - yes / no. (Asked at 6-weeks, 6 months, and every 6 months)
Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Falling
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Self-reported falling in the prior month - yes / no. (Asked at 6-weeks, 6 months, and every 6 months)
Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Nocturnal and daytime blood pressure
Time Frame: 6 months
302 subjects will undergo 24-hour BP monitoring after 6 months to determine differences in blood pressure between groups.
6 months
Self-reported worsening of vision
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Vision self-reported as "much worse" compared to the last follow-up at any point, or "slightly worse" than the last follow-up, on 2 or more occasions (Note: vision is reported at 6-weeks, 6-months, and every 6-months, as either "unchanged", "slightly worse", or "much worse" than the last follow-up)
Through study completion, an average of 4 years
New impairment consistent with dementia
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Short Blessed Test score newly 10 or greater at 18-month assessment, or new physician administrative claims diagnosis of dementia at any point during follow-up
Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Hip fracture
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Any break of the hip joint or femoral neck
Through study completion, an average of 4 years
Nocturia frequency
Time Frame: 6-months
Self-reported change from baseline in the number of overnight urinations per week (at 6-weeks and 6-months)
6-months
Nocturia burden
Time Frame: 6-months
Self-reported nocturia burden in the prior month, recorded as no nocturia, or nocturia that is "no problem", "minor problem", or "major problem" (at 6-weeks and 6-months)
6-months
Adherence to medication timing allocation
Time Frame: 6-months
Proportion of BP medication doses taken at the allocated time at 6-months (twice daily medications being considered as ½ dose in the AM and ½ dose in the PM for this calculation)
6-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Scott R Garrison, MD, PhD, University of Alberta

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 31, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 22, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 22, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

December 13, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Upon completion of all planned studies related to this project, anonymized patient level data for all outcomes and baseline characteristics will be made available in the form of a downloadable spreadsheet accessed through the Pragmatic Trials Collaborative's website (www.PragmaticTrials.ca)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Use of blood pressure lowering medication at bedtime

Subscribe