Safety and Efficacy of BRM421 for Dry Eye Syndrome

April 13, 2026 updated by: BRIM Biotechnology Inc.

A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double Masked, Placebo Controlled Clinical Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of BRM421 Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Dry Eye Using a Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE®) Model

The objective of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of BRM421 Ophthalmic Solution to placebo for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of dry eye.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a multi-center, double-masked, randomized, vehicle-controlled, phase 2 study in approximately 150 subjects. (75 per treatment arm).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

157

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maine
      • Lewiston, Maine, United States, 04240
        • Central Maine Eye Care
    • Massachusetts
      • Andover, Massachusetts, United States, 01810
        • Andover Eye Associates

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be at least 18 years of age;
  • Provide written informed consent;
  • Have a reported history of dry eye for at least 6 months prior to enrollment;
  • Have a history of use of eye drops

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have any clinically significant slit lamp findings at Visit 1 that may include active blepharitis, meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), lid margin inflammation or active ocular allergies that require therapeutic treatment, and/or in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with study parameters;
  • Be diagnosed with an ongoing ocular infection (bacterial, viral, or fungal), or active ocular inflammation at Visit 1;
  • Have worn contact lenses within 7 days of Visit 1 or anticipate using contact lenses during the study;
  • Have used any eye drops within 2 hours of Visit 1;
  • Have previously had laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery within the last 12 months;
  • Be a woman of childbearing potential who is not using an acceptable means of birth control; acceptable methods of contraception

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: BRM421 Ophthalmic Solution
The active control with BRM421 solution
0.03%(w/v) BRIM421 ophthalmic solution
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
The vehicle solution
vehicle ophthalmic drops

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sign: Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score
Time Frame: change from baseline to week 4

The staining was graded with the Ora Calibra® Corneal and Conjunctival Staining Scale. The ocular surface was divided into three regions, including superior, central and inferior region. The following scale was used to grade staining of the each region. Half (0.5) grade increments may be used. The total score of corneal fluorescein staining was calculated as the sum of three regions, the score range is 0 (minimum) to 12 (maximum).

None 0 = no staining Trace 1 = occasional Mild 2 = countable Moderate 3 = uncountable, but not confluent Severe 4 = confluent

change from baseline to week 4
Symptom: Ocular Discomfort Score
Time Frame: change from baseline to week 4

Ocular discomfort scores was subjectively graded by the subjects according to the following Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort Scale, rating each eye separately, the score range is 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum).

0 = no discomfort

  1. = intermittent awareness
  2. = constant awareness
  3. = intermittent discomfort
  4. = constant discomfort
change from baseline to week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tear Film Break-up Time
Time Frame: change from baseline to week 4
The examiner was instilled 5 uL of 2% preservative-free sodium fluorescein solution into the inferior conjunctival cul-de-sac of each eye. With the aid of a slit-lamp, the examiner monitored the integrity of the tear film, noting the time (seconds) it takes to form micelles from the time that the eye is opened.
change from baseline to week 4
Conjunctival Redness
Time Frame: change from baseline to week 4

Conjunctival redness was graded according to the following scale: Half (0.5) unit increments may be used.

None 0 = Normal, without vasodilation Trace 1 = Trace ciliary or conjunctival vasodilation Mild 2 = Broad ciliary vasodilation; Moderate 3 = Broad ciliary and slight, horizontal conjunctival vasodilation Severe 4 = Broad ciliary and prominent, horizontal conjunctival vasodilation

change from baseline to week 4
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)©
Time Frame: change from baseline to week 4
OSDI scores was subjectively graded by the subjects according to the Ocular Surface and Disease Index (OSDI) Scale. Patients scored each question from 0 to 4 (higher score means more severe), and the OSDI score is the sum of total 12 questions. The score range is 0 (minimum) to 48 (maximum).
change from baseline to week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Lonsdale, MD, Central Maine Eye Care
  • Principal Investigator: Gail Torkildsen, MD, Andover Eye Associates

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 7, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 20, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 28, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2026

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BRM421-16-C001-PR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Eye Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe