Multi-disciplinary Participatory Design of a Process to Deliver a CKD Diagnosis in Primary Care (EPIK)

September 14, 2021 updated by: Julie Wright-Nunes, University of Michigan

This study will use an adapted education worksheet to support patient-centered chronic kidney disease (CKD) communication, shared decision making, and patient engagement and will test its impact on intermediate patient modifiable characteristics in a primary care practice with patients who have pre-dialysis CKD.

The study team will enroll up to 100 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) from a primary care clinic to start. Patients will receive the intervention, which consists of the physicians using the education worksheet during appointments with patients, and patients and providers will complete surveys about its use and to measure impact on knowledge and other areas related to patient outcomes.

Once initial user testing is complete, the study team plans to submit an amendment to expand on this trial and incorporate comparison sites. This will be submitted and receive IRB approval prior to participant involvement.

The study hypothesis is that patients who receive the intervention will have greater knowledge about their CKD diagnosis, higher satisfaction with provider communication, and higher scores related to managing CKD to keep themselves healthy compared to control populations.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Amendment on 12/2018: The enrollment numbers were updated to include the control group.

Clarification 9/2021: After initial feasibility was assessed, the initial site was used additionally to enroll for the "second arm", rather than a new site as originally intended. A second site was then used for the control population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

78

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Canton, Michigan, United States, 48187
        • Canton Health Center
      • Northville, Michigan, United States, 48168
        • Northville Health Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years old or older
  • Have an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2
  • Able to read and understand English without an interpreter
  • Diagnosed with chronic kidney disease on record

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with renal transplant or on dialysis
  • Patients who have documented or provider known cognitive impairment or vision impairment that will prohibit meaningful interaction with education activation worksheet
  • Patients who are not aware of their CKD diagnosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Participatory design and intervention
Patients in this arm will receive the intervention of using an education worksheet during their appointment with their provider. They will be asked to complete post intervention surveys (for feasibility and feedback prior to actual trial enrollment). Providers and staff at this site have been involved in the design of the intervention process, to make it streamlined and efficient for application in practice.
Patients who screen positive for CKD and give written informed consent to be a part of the study will have their chart flagged for the medical assistant and provider to give the education worksheet intervention. The education worksheet has been developed to be used as an electronic tool within the Electronic Medical Record. The provider will review it with the patient during the visit. A paper copy will print out for the patient at the end of the visit.
Other Names:
  • Education Activation Worksheet
Experimental: Intervention Only
This arm include new patients at the initial site that also received the intervention of using an education worksheet during their appointment and filled out post intervention surveys. Some of these providers/staff were not involved in the initial design of the intervention.
Patients who screen positive for CKD and give written informed consent to be a part of the study will have their chart flagged for the medical assistant and provider to give the education worksheet intervention. The education worksheet has been developed to be used as an electronic tool within the Electronic Medical Record. The provider will review it with the patient during the visit. A paper copy will print out for the patient at the end of the visit.
Other Names:
  • Education Activation Worksheet
No Intervention: Usual Care
A second site included usual care, which did not include the intervention. Participants were given post visit surveys similar to those in the two other study / intervention arms. This site served as a usual care comparison.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Level of objective understanding of CKD as measured by the Kidney Knowledge Survey (KiKS)
Time Frame: Length of doctor's appointment, e.g., 1-2 hours
This will measure objective kidney disease knowledge, based on a score of 0-100, where 0 means poor level of kidney knowledge, and 100 means good level of kidney knowledge. The KiKS was developed by Dr. Wright.
Length of doctor's appointment, e.g., 1-2 hours
Level of perceived understanding of CKD as measured by the Perceived Kidney Knowledge Survey (PiKS)
Time Frame: Length of doctor's appointment, e.g., 1-2 hours
This will measure subjective kidney knowledge. Score range is 1-4, where 1 is low level of perceived kidney knowledge, and 4 is high level of perceived kidney knowledge. The PiKS was developed by Dr. Wright.
Length of doctor's appointment, e.g., 1-2 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Level of positive perception of patient-provider communication as measured by the Patient Communication Assessment Tool (CAT)
Time Frame: Length of doctor's appointment, e.g., 1-2 hours
This assesses the quality of physician to patient and physician's staff to patient communication. Score range is 1-5, where 1 means negative perception of communication and 5 means positive perception of communication.
Length of doctor's appointment, e.g., 1-2 hours
Level of mental anxiety/stress related to condition as measured by the adapted NDBCSS scale
Time Frame: Length of doctor's appointment, e.g., 1-2 hours
The 19-item NDBCSS (Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Stress Scale) is adapted to form the 21-item scale in the patient survey to measure stress associated with CKD. The score range is 1-4, where 1 means high level of stress associated with CKD and 4 means low level of stress associated with CKD.
Length of doctor's appointment, e.g., 1-2 hours
Level of energy/fatigue and emotional well-being as measured by the SF-36 mental health component
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The SF-36 mental health component is a 9-item scale that measures energy/fatigue and emotional well-being in the past 4 weeks.Score range is 0-100, where 0 means poor emotional well-being and low energy and 100 means good emotional well-being and high energy.
4 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Level of positive assessment of care as measured by the Patient Assessment of Care for Chronic Conditions (PACIC) scale
Time Frame: 6 months
This is a 11-item scale evaluating patient assessment of the quality of care that patients received in the past 6 months. Score range is 1-5, where 1 means poor assessment of quality of care and 5 means good assessment of quality of care.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Julie Wright-Nunes, MD, MPH, University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 5, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 11, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 11, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HUM00118819
  • 4K23DK097183-04 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Kidney Disease

Clinical Trials on Education worksheet

3
Subscribe