Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Multi-disciplinary Participatory Design of a Process to Deliver a CKD Diagnosis in Primary Care (EPIK)

14 de septiembre de 2021 actualizado por: Julie Wright-Nunes, University of Michigan

This study will use an adapted education worksheet to support patient-centered chronic kidney disease (CKD) communication, shared decision making, and patient engagement and will test its impact on intermediate patient modifiable characteristics in a primary care practice with patients who have pre-dialysis CKD.

The study team will enroll up to 100 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) from a primary care clinic to start. Patients will receive the intervention, which consists of the physicians using the education worksheet during appointments with patients, and patients and providers will complete surveys about its use and to measure impact on knowledge and other areas related to patient outcomes.

Once initial user testing is complete, the study team plans to submit an amendment to expand on this trial and incorporate comparison sites. This will be submitted and receive IRB approval prior to participant involvement.

The study hypothesis is that patients who receive the intervention will have greater knowledge about their CKD diagnosis, higher satisfaction with provider communication, and higher scores related to managing CKD to keep themselves healthy compared to control populations.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

Amendment on 12/2018: The enrollment numbers were updated to include the control group.

Clarification 9/2021: After initial feasibility was assessed, the initial site was used additionally to enroll for the "second arm", rather than a new site as originally intended. A second site was then used for the control population.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

78

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

  • Estados Unidos
    • Michigan
      • Canton, Michigan, Estados Unidos, 48187
        • Canton Health Center
      • Northville, Michigan, Estados Unidos, 48168
        • Northville Health Center

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years old or older
  • Have an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2
  • Able to read and understand English without an interpreter
  • Diagnosed with chronic kidney disease on record

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with renal transplant or on dialysis
  • Patients who have documented or provider known cognitive impairment or vision impairment that will prohibit meaningful interaction with education activation worksheet
  • Patients who are not aware of their CKD diagnosis

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Prevención
  • Asignación: No aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación factorial
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Participatory design and intervention
Patients in this arm will receive the intervention of using an education worksheet during their appointment with their provider. They will be asked to complete post intervention surveys (for feasibility and feedback prior to actual trial enrollment). Providers and staff at this site have been involved in the design of the intervention process, to make it streamlined and efficient for application in practice.
Conductual: Education worksheet
Patients who screen positive for CKD and give written informed consent to be a part of the study will have their chart flagged for the medical assistant and provider to give the education worksheet intervention. The education worksheet has been developed to be used as an electronic tool within the Electronic Medical Record. The provider will review it with the patient during the visit. A paper copy will print out for the patient at the end of the visit.
Otros nombres:
  • Education Activation Worksheet
Experimental: Intervention Only
This arm include new patients at the initial site that also received the intervention of using an education worksheet during their appointment and filled out post intervention surveys. Some of these providers/staff were not involved in the initial design of the intervention.
Conductual: Education worksheet
Patients who screen positive for CKD and give written informed consent to be a part of the study will have their chart flagged for the medical assistant and provider to give the education worksheet intervention. The education worksheet has been developed to be used as an electronic tool within the Electronic Medical Record. The provider will review it with the patient during the visit. A paper copy will print out for the patient at the end of the visit.
Otros nombres:
  • Education Activation Worksheet
Sin intervención: Usual Care
A second site included usual care, which did not include the intervention. Participants were given post visit surveys similar to those in the two other study / intervention arms. This site served as a usual care comparison.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Level of objective understanding of CKD as measured by the Kidney Knowledge Survey (KiKS)
Periodo de tiempo: Length of doctor's appointment, e.g., 1-2 hours
This will measure objective kidney disease knowledge, based on a score of 0-100, where 0 means poor level of kidney knowledge, and 100 means good level of kidney knowledge. The KiKS was developed by Dr. Wright.
Length of doctor's appointment, e.g., 1-2 hours
Level of perceived understanding of CKD as measured by the Perceived Kidney Knowledge Survey (PiKS)
Periodo de tiempo: Length of doctor's appointment, e.g., 1-2 hours
This will measure subjective kidney knowledge. Score range is 1-4, where 1 is low level of perceived kidney knowledge, and 4 is high level of perceived kidney knowledge. The PiKS was developed by Dr. Wright.
Length of doctor's appointment, e.g., 1-2 hours

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Level of positive perception of patient-provider communication as measured by the Patient Communication Assessment Tool (CAT)
Periodo de tiempo: Length of doctor's appointment, e.g., 1-2 hours
This assesses the quality of physician to patient and physician's staff to patient communication. Score range is 1-5, where 1 means negative perception of communication and 5 means positive perception of communication.
Length of doctor's appointment, e.g., 1-2 hours
Level of mental anxiety/stress related to condition as measured by the adapted NDBCSS scale
Periodo de tiempo: Length of doctor's appointment, e.g., 1-2 hours
The 19-item NDBCSS (Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Stress Scale) is adapted to form the 21-item scale in the patient survey to measure stress associated with CKD. The score range is 1-4, where 1 means high level of stress associated with CKD and 4 means low level of stress associated with CKD.
Length of doctor's appointment, e.g., 1-2 hours
Level of energy/fatigue and emotional well-being as measured by the SF-36 mental health component
Periodo de tiempo: 4 weeks
The SF-36 mental health component is a 9-item scale that measures energy/fatigue and emotional well-being in the past 4 weeks.Score range is 0-100, where 0 means poor emotional well-being and low energy and 100 means good emotional well-being and high energy.
4 weeks

Otras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Level of positive assessment of care as measured by the Patient Assessment of Care for Chronic Conditions (PACIC) scale
Periodo de tiempo: 6 months
This is a 11-item scale evaluating patient assessment of the quality of care that patients received in the past 6 months. Score range is 1-5, where 1 means poor assessment of quality of care and 5 means good assessment of quality of care.
6 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

University of Michigan

Colaboradores

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Julie Wright-Nunes, MD, MPH, University of Michigan

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

5 de junio de 2017

Finalización primaria (Actual)

11 de septiembre de 2020

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

11 de septiembre de 2020

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

20 de febrero de 2017

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

13 de marzo de 2017

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

20 de marzo de 2017

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

21 de septiembre de 2021

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

14 de septiembre de 2021

Última verificación

1 de septiembre de 2021

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • HUM00118819
  • 4K23DK097183-04 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Enfermedad Renal Crónica

Ensayos clínicos sobre Education worksheet

Buscar ensayos similares

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

CROs by country

CROs in Turkmenistan

Condiciones

Enfermedades Raras

Intervenciones de drogas

Suplementos dietéticos

Patrocinador / Colaboradores

Localizaciones

Suscribir