Cotinine Feedback as an Intervention to Change Parental/Caregiver Smoking Behavior Around Children With Cancer

October 28, 2014 updated by: University of South Florida

RATIONALE: Providing parent/caregivers of children with cancer with education and evidence of secondhand smoke exposure can protect the child from future exposure to tobacco smoke.

PURPOSE: This randomized study will compare education only to education plus cotinine feedback in decreasing secondhand smoke exposure in pediatric patients with cancer that reside with a household smoker.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

The primary objective of this study is to determine if providing urine cotinine feedback to caregivers in conjunction with standard education will be more effective than education alone in reducing patient SHS exposure.

The secondary objectives of this study are:

To determine whether urine cotinine feedback in conjunction with education provided to the caregiver is more effective in changing parental smoking behavior compared to education alone.

As an exploratory measure we will collect history and physical exam data to follow patient's clinical complications during the study to determine if patients with a decrease in SHS exposure also have a decrease in clinical complications.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Delaware
      • Wilmington, Delaware, United States, 19803
        • Alfred I. DuPont Hospital for Children
    • Florida
      • Fort Myers, Florida, United States, 33908
        • Lee Memorial Hospital - The Golisano Children's Hospital of Southwest Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32207
        • Nemours Children's Clinic
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32827
        • Nemours Children's Hospital
      • Pensacola, Florida, United States, 32504
        • Nemours Children's Clinic
      • St. Petersburgh, Florida, United States, 33701
        • All Children's Hospital
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33606
        • Tampa General Hospital
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest University Health Sciences
    • Wisconsin
      • Green Bay, Wisconsin, United States, 54301
        • St. Vincent Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 2 years and ≤ 12 years at the time of study entry.
  • Currently undergoing treatment for cancer at the time of enrollment, at least 28 days post diagnosis.
  • The child must reside 5 days a week with a household smoker (defined as a person who smokes greater than 10 cigarettes daily).
  • Child must be potty trained.
  • Parent/Legal Guardian ≥ 18 years of age.
  • Parent/Legal Guardian who accompanies the child to the first visit must accompany the child to all other visits. This person does not need to be the household smoker, but must be willing to educate the smoker on results at the visit and take the education handout home to them.
  • Parent/Legal Guardian must have a working phone to complete the week 5 follow-up phone call.
  • Able and willing to sign informed consent/assent.
  • Signed HIPAA compliant research authorization.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Planned hospitalization within 3 days of any scheduled study visit (due to the urine cotinine measurement representing the previous 48-72 hours of tobacco exposure.
  • Inability to perform the initial cotinine test.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active Intervention
Those randomized to the active intervention will receive education about secondhand smoke exposure and feedback using the cotinine test strip.
Participants in both groups will receive education by the EPA on the danger of exposure to secondhand smoke and how exposure can be prevented.
Those randomized to the active intervention will also be provided with education utilizing the cotinine test strip in conjunction with the education from the EPA.
Other: Education only
Those randomized to the education only group will receive only the education about secondhand smoke exposure.
Participants in both groups will receive education by the EPA on the danger of exposure to secondhand smoke and how exposure can be prevented.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in urine cotinine level
Time Frame: 4 weeks after baseline visit
The primary objective of this study is to determine if providing urine cotinine feedback to caregivers in conjunction with standard education will be more effective than education alone in reducing patient SHS exposure.
4 weeks after baseline visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Self-Reported Smoking Behavior
Time Frame: 4 weeks after baseline visit
To determine whether urine cotinine feedback in conjunction with education provided to the caregiver is more effective in changing parental smoking behavior compared to education alone.
4 weeks after baseline visit
Number of medical complications
Time Frame: 4 weeks after baseline visit
As an exploratory measure we will collect history and physical exam data to follow patient's clinical complications during the study to determine if patients with a decrease in SHS exposure also have a decrease in clinical complications.
4 weeks after baseline visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Marisa Couluris, DO, University of South Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 10, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 29, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2014

Last Verified

October 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SCUSF 1201

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pediatric Cancer

Clinical Trials on Education

Subscribe