Effect of Emergency Department Care Reorganization on Door-to-antibiotic Times for Sepsis (LDS SWARM)

June 1, 2020 updated by: Ithan Peltan, Intermountain Health Care, Inc.
Sepsis is a common syndrome resulting from a dysregulated response to infection. The timing of antibiotic initiation is an important determinant of outcomes for patients presenting to the emergency department with sepsis. The potential effect of care reorganization on very early care for sepsis is unknown. This study will investigate whether multidisciplinary coordination of the initial patient evaluation in the emergency department influences door-to-antibiotic time for septic patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a retrospective cohort study of emergency department sepsis care before versus after implementation of a "swarming" model for simultaneous patient evaluation by multidisciplinary care providers. The analysis will use data from similar hospitals that did not change sepsis care organization during the study period to control for changes in sepsis care not resulting from the "swarming" intervention.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

3230

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Murray, Utah, United States, 84157
        • Intermountain Medical Center
      • Riverton, Utah, United States, 84065
        • Riverton Hospital
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84143
        • LDS Hospital
      • Sandy, Utah, United States, 84094
        • Alta View Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients presenting to the ED with sepsis or septic shock

Description

Primary inclusion criteria:

  • Adult patients age ≥18 years
  • Presented to the ED of study hospital from May 16, 2015 to April 15, 2016 (pre-implementation cohort) or May 16 to November 15, 2016 (post-implementation cohort)
  • Sepsis present in ED (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] score ≥2 points above baseline while in ED plus antibiotic initiation while in the ED)
  • Triage acuity score 2-5

Inclusion criteria for supplemental sensitivity analyses:

  • Presented to the ED of study hospital between May 16, 2015 and April 15, 2016 (pre-implementation cohort) or May 16, 2016 and February 15, 2017 (post-implementation cohort).
  • Sepsis on presentation to ED, defined as initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score ≥2 points above baseline plus antibiotics initiation within 24 hours of ED arrival.

Overall exclusion criteria:

  • Age <18 years
  • No antibiotics within 24 hours of ED arrival

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Pre-implementation (intervention site)
Adult patients age ≥18 years who received usual care after presenting to the ED of the intervention hospital with sepsis or septic shock between May 16, 2015 and April 15, 2016
Post-implementation (intervention site)
Adult patients age ≥18 years eligible to receive immediate evaluation by multidisciplinary team ("swarming") after presenting to the ED of the intervention hospital with sepsis or septic shock between May 16, 2016 and February 15, 2017
Simultaneous initial evaluation by the ED physician, nurse, and patient care associate
Other Names:
  • Swarming
Pre-implementation (control site)
Adult patients age ≥18 years who received usual care after presenting to the ED of a non-intervention study hospital with sepsis or septic shock between May 16, 2015 and April 15, 2016
Post-implementation (control site)
Adult patients age ≥18 years who received usual care after presenting to the ED of a non-intervention study hospital with sepsis or septic shock between May 16, 2016 and February 15, 2017

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time From ED Arrival to Administration of First Dose of Antibiotics
Time Frame: 24 hours
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital Mortality
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
Up to 1 year
ED Length of Stay
Time Frame: Up to 1 week
Time (minutes) from ED arrival to ED departure
Up to 1 week
Door-to-physician Evaluation Time
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours
Time (minutes) from subject's arrival in the ED until initial evaluation by a physician.
Up to 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ithan Peltan, MD, MSc, Intermountain Health Care, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 16, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

April 11, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

In order to protect patient privacy and comply with relevant regulations, identified data will be unavailable. Requests for deidentified data from qualified researchers with appropriate ethics board approvals and relevant data use agreements will be processed by the Intermountain Office of Research, officeofresearch@imail.org.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on Immediate evaluation by multidisciplinary team

3
Subscribe