Monitoring the Weight Evolution Using a Connected Scale (TELEBARIA)

February 28, 2022 updated by: University Hospital, Lille

Evaluation of a Personalized Care Path After Bariatric Surgery Based on Monitoring the Weight Evolution Using a Connected Scale

Current guideline recommend yearly multidisciplinary postoperative follow-up after bariatric surgery. However, practices remain very heterogeneous, and only a fraction of patients are still follow-up beyond two years after the operation.

This study will assess a new care pathway in which the patients are follow-up according to the weight evolution measured by the patient using a connected scale.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Bariatric surgery is developing rapidly. In France, the number of annual interventions increased threefold between 2001 and 2015, from 16,000 to 50,000 per year. This rapid development is explained by the well-demonstrated benefits of surgery: spectacular improvement in the quality of life, reduction in co-morbidities (diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and steatohepatitis), and significant reduction in mortality linked to severe obesity. However, the benefits of surgery may decrease over time and may be associated with side effects.

Current guideline recommend yearly multidisciplinary postoperative follow-up after bariatric surgery. However, practices remain very heterogeneous, and only a fraction of patients are still follow-up beyond two years after the operation. The current recommendations therefore do not seem adapted to clinical reality. They do not prevent the regain of weight in many patients, which frequently leads to re-operations. Even more worrying is the possible occurrence of late complications, sometimes serious and life-threatening.

This study will assess a new care pathway in which the patients are follow-up according to weight evolution measured by the patient using a connected scale.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

390

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Boulogne Sur Mer, France, 62321
        • Recruiting
        • Ch Boulogne-Sur-Mer - Boulogne Sur Mer
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Marie LEPAGE, MD
      • Lille, France, 59037
        • Recruiting
        • Hop Claude Huriez Chu Lille
        • Principal Investigator:
          • François PATTOU, MD,PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients aged> = at 18 years old Patients who have benefited from a Roux-en-Y Gastric By-Pass or Sleeve Gastrectomy bariatric surgery 2 years ago Preoperative Body Mass Index between 35 kg/m2 and 59 kg/m2 Access to the wired network at home. Social insured patient Patient who signed the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Lack of autonomy for the use of remote monitoring equipment or psychological or psychiatric disorders making it difficult to optimally use the remote monitoring equipment

Administrative reasons: inability to receive informed consent information, inability to participate in the entire study, lack of social security coverage, refusal to sign consent, patient under guardianship or justice system.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control Group
In the control group, patients will follow a care pathway respecting the current recommendations : a systematic clinical visit scheduled each year with the multidisciplinary team.
Clinical visits conducted by a multidisciplinary team every year
Other Names:
  • Clinical visits conducted by a multidisciplinary team every year
EXPERIMENTAL: Experimental Group
In the intervention group, patients will follow a new care pathway with visits triggered by weight evolution
Clinical visits are triggered by weight evolution measured by connected balance
Other Names:
  • Clinical visits triggered by weight evolution

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the efficacy of new care pathway
Time Frame: 3 years

The main evaluation criterion is the success rate in terms of weight loss defined by an excess weight loss greater than 50%, in the absence undernutrition.

Undernutrition is defined by a BMI < 21 kg / m2 and / or an albumin level <35 g /l

3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cost-effectiveness of new care pathway
Time Frame: 3 years
Cost-effectiveness of new care pathway
3 years
Number of visits made by the multidisciplinary team
Time Frame: 3 years
Number of visits made by the multidisciplinary team
3 years
Number of postoperative surgical and / or medical complications
Time Frame: 3 years
Number of postoperative surgical and / or medical complications that justified hospitalisation
3 years
Change of nutritional parameters in the blood of vitamines
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
Change of nutritional parameters in the blood of minerals
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
Change of nutritional parameters in the blood of protein
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ)
Time Frame: 3 years
Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (DEBQ) consists of 33 items and assesses on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from "never" to "very often" external, restraint and emotional eating. For the study, only the 10 items of the external eating subscale will be used. The variable of interest will be the corresponding External eating subscale score.
3 years
Frequency of Food Consumption Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 years
A food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) consists of a finite list of foods and beverages with response categories to indicate usual frequency of consumption over the time period queried. To assess the total diet, the number of foods and beverages queried typically ranges from 80 to 120.
3 years
Anxiety and depression by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire (HAD)
Time Frame: 3 years
Changes of anxiety and depression over three weeks training on a 4-point likert scale scored 0-3. Max 21 Points for each subscale, cut off for anxiety and Depression are set at 7 Points higher values represent more anxiety and Depression.
3 years
Ricci-Gagnon score
Time Frame: 3 years

Evaluation of physical activity This score describe the physical profile : inactive, active, very active, at month 4 It is calculated by adding the number of points (1 to 5) corresponding to the box checked for each question.

Less than 18=inactive Between 18 and 35=active More than 35=Active

3 years
Quality of life of SF36
Time Frame: 3 years
Short Form 36 v2.0 acute (SF-36) is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. SF-36 measures the subject's overall Health Related Quality of Life on 8 domains: physical functioning, role functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health.
3 years
Quality of life of questionnaire EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: 3 years
The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire will be used to estimate the impact on subjects' health-related quality of life and provides a description of subjects' problems by dimensions (descriptive system), a score for overall self-rated health (visual analogue scale [VAS]) as well as an index score (EQ-5D-5L index). EQ-5D index score range: 0 to 1 and EQ-5D-VAS: range 0 to 100. A higher score indicates better self reported health status.
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 25, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 1, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 15, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017_78
  • 2018-A01946-49 (OTHER: ID-RCB number, ANSM)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bariatric Surgery

Clinical Trials on Control Group

3
Subscribe