Evaluation of Adherence and Engagement in a Cognitive Training Program for Older Adults

August 23, 2017 updated by: Rogerio Panizzutti, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
There is evidence that computerized cognitive training can improve cognition in healthy older adults and in people at risk of developing dementia, although an effective model to implement the training in the daily life of people and to ensure engagement is missing. This project studies the adherence, engagement and progress on computerized cognitive training exercises that were offered by the Association of Retirees from the Telecommunications (ASASTEL) to its associates. One hundred subjects in three different cities (Rio de Janeiro, Belo Horizonte and Brasilia) received licenses to perform the exercises on line and were followed by a team of psychologists. We will evaluate adherence, engagement and progress on the computerized cognitive training exercises of those subjects.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • RJ
      • Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
        • Recruiting
        • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • To be an associate of ASASTEL, or the spouse of an associate,
  • To have access to the internet at home and proficiency on accessing and navigating the internet,
  • Availability to be evaluated and followed by the professional team.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any medical condition that precludes performing the computerized training exercises,
  • Score below 27 points in the Mini Mental State Examination (MEEM),
  • Moderated or advanced dementia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cognitive Training
The cognitive training program consists of a set of computerized exercises designed to improve the speed and accuracy of auditory information processing while engaging neuromodulatory systems involved in attention and reward. These exercises continuously adjust the difficulty level to user performance to maintain an approximately 85% rate of correct responses. Trials with correct responses are rewarded with points and animations.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Training adherence
Time Frame: 1 year
Training adherence will be defined as a continuous variable (number of hours of training completed by the participant).
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Individual gains on the computerized exercises
Time Frame: 1 year
The computerized cognitive training platform, called BrainHQ, provided by Posit Science Inc, provides the individual gains on the computerized exercises with training.
1 year
Motivation with the computerized training exercise
Time Frame: 1 year
Motivation will be assessed by quantitative (measured as a percentage of all stimulus sets available in the exercises of the BrainHq computerized cognitive training platform) and qualitative questionnaires (Adapted Ultrech Engagement Scale - UWES).
1 year
Training adherence (dichotomic variable)
Time Frame: 1 year
Additionally training adherence will be defined as a dichotomic variable (below or above 10 hours of training).
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 7, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ASASTEL study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aging

Clinical Trials on Computerized cognitive training

3
Subscribe