Evaluating a Novel Working Memory Training Program to Decrease Symptoms of PTSD

October 4, 2017 updated by: Rick Gulizia
The study is designed to evaluate the effect of a novel computer training program on PTSD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Post-traumatic stress Disorder (PTSD) is a chronic and debilitating disorder that affects millions of people each year (Kessler et al., 2005). Although effective psychosocial and pharmacological treatments exist for this disorder, as many as 50 percent of individuals still experience symptoms after treatment (Schottenbaeur et al., 2008). Empirical literature suggests that cognitive deficits may play a role in maintaining symptoms in individuals with PTSD through a variety of mechanisms, including decreased cognitive control over intrusive thoughts (Verwoerd et al., in press) and dysregulation in neural circuitry linking prefrontal cognitive control functions and amygdala activity (McNally, 2007). The goals of the proposed research are to improve the candidate's understanding of cognitive mechanisms of PTSD symptoms while building skills in conducting treatment research. The application aims to test a novel methodology for approaching PTSD treatment based on modification of underlying cognitive mechanisms of the disorder. To this end, 50 participants with PTSD will be randomly assigned to an 8-session executive control training condition designed to improve working memory functioning or a control condition. The aims of this study are 1) To test the effect of a working memory training program on working memory performance and 2) To examine the effects of this program on PTSD symptoms. The research plan is complemented by a set of training goals for the candidate to achieve over the proposed award period. These include 1) training in the use of fMRI and neuropsychological assessment 2) additional coursework and seminars in cognitive science and biostatistics for use in future work, 3) experience with teaching in the undergraduate and graduate setting and presenting original work for publication in preparation for a career in academic research. Taken together, the research and training components of this grant application will facilitate the candidate's long-term goal of conducting treatment outcome and basic mechanism research in PTSD. Moreover, as per the strategic plan outlined by NIMH, this application is designed develop an innovative intervention based on prior clinical research and knowledge of cognitive and neurobiological features of the disorder, and will advance knowledge of mechanisms of fear learning. It is designed to target core cognitive features of the disorder in an effort to reduce symptoms. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Post-traumatic stress disorder impacts millions of Americans, and is associated with significant personal distress as well as societal cost. The current application is designed to examine the effect of a novel working memory training program on PTSD symptoms. This approach is promising in that it may be a cost- effective and accessible method for decreasing symptoms associate with this disorder.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

47

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female
  • Age 18-65
  • Primary DSM-IV diagnosis of PTSD secondary to sexual trauma

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current trauma or PTSD-focused psychosocial treatment
  • Active suicidality, evidence of substance dependence in the past 6 months
  • Evidence of current or past schizophrenia
  • Bipolar disorder
  • Organic mental disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: High Interference Control Condition
Computerized training program requiring participants to repeatedly practice controlling interference on a cognitive task
Cognitive training using working memory span task
Active Comparator: Low Interference Control Condition
Computerized training program requiring participants to minimally practice controlling interference on a cognitive task
Sham training condition

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Clinician Administered PTSD Scale; Re-experiencing
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4

Model estimations of the means and standard deviation of posttreatment score at the mean level of baseline severity reported below.

Scale range: 0-40, higher values indicate greater symptom severity

Baseline, Week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinician Administered PTSD Scale Total Score - Responder Status
Time Frame: Week 4
Number of Participants Who Responded According to Clinician Administered PTSD Scale Total Score
Week 4
Change in Depression: Beck Depression Inventory
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4
Scale Range: 0-63; higher scores indicate greater symptom severity
Baseline, Week 4
Change in General Anxiety: Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4
Range: 20-80; higher scores indicate greater symptom severity
Baseline, Week 4
Change in Functional Impairment; Sheehan Disability Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4
Range: 0-30; greater values indicate greater disability severity ratings
Baseline, Week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jessica A Bomyea, M.S., San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego
  • Principal Investigator: Ariel J Lang, Ph.D., University of California, San Diego

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

May 15, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • F31MH088170 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Clinical Trials on Computerized Cognitive Training - active

3
Subscribe