Metabolic Determinants Of Resting Energy Expenditure Among Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients

October 22, 2017 updated by: Tah Pei Chien, University of Malaya

Metabolic Determinants Of Resting Energy Expenditure Among Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients In Malaysian Tertiary Hospital

Currently there are no study related to Indirect Calorimetry (IC) has been done among hospitalised Malaysian ICU adult patients with its racial mix. The aim of this study is to perform a cross-sectional study in Malaysian critically ill patients to determine metabolic determinants that might influence resting energy expenditure (REE) and to develop predictive equation for the estimation of energy requirement using the regression based approach to increase the accuracy in calorie prescriptions. In addition, expected outcome of this study is to determine which equations have clinical usefulness among Malaysian adult critically ill patients and hope to introduce into routine clinical practice in the future if IC is not available.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Nutrition provision in the clinical setting relies heavily on the accurate estimation of energy and protein requirements. This can be done in a quick and inexpensive manner via the use of predictive equations. Some of the most popularly used predictive equations such as the Harris-Benedict equation and the Mifflin-St. Jeor equation have been widely applied within the clinical setting to estimate energy requirements among mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. However, these existing equations were not specially developed for a population with disease, as the equations were derived from a pool of healthy Caucasian adults. In addition, most of the equations for critically ill patients such as the Penn State equation, Faisy equation and Raurich Equation developed and validated among Caucasian in western country and not among Asian population. Therefore, their accuracy in predicting energy requirement is questionable when applied within Malaysian mechanically ventilated critically ill patients with its racial mix.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

314

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Wilayah Persekutuan
      • Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, Malaysia, 59100
        • Recruiting
        • University of Malaya Medical Centre
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Mohd Shahnaz Bin Hasan
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Vineya Rai Hakumat Rai
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Bee Koon Poh
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Mohd Basri Bin Mat Nor
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Hazreen Bin Abdul Majid
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Chee Cheong Kee
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Mazuin Kamarul Zaman

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Critically ill patients with mechanically ventilated

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult patients aged over 18 years old
  2. Critically ill patients with mechanically ventilated
  3. Expected to have an ICU stay of more than 5 days
  4. Patients had implemented for continuous enteral or parenteral nutrition support.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Requirement for inspired oxygen content (FiO2) greater than 0.6
  2. Patients on high frequency ventilation
  3. Patients with chest tubes that leak air
  4. Patients with incompetent tracheal cuff
  5. Patients inhaled nitric oxide therapy
  6. Patients receiving intermittent hemodialysis and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) during IC measurement
  7. Patients with pregnancy
  8. Patients with burn injury
  9. Patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  10. Patients with severe liver disease (Child-Pugh score C)
  11. Patients with post open heart surgery
  12. Patients with paraplegia and quadriplegia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
critically ill adult patients

Part I: A cross-sectional study to compare validity of several predictive equations used to predict REE in critically ill adult patients for staying ≤ 5 days, 6 - 10 days and > 10 days by using indirect calorimetry (IC) as the reference standard.

Part II: To develop predictive equation for the estimation of energy requirement by identifying variables that might influence REE of mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.

Part III: To validate the newly developed predictive equation for the estimation of energy requirement by using Ten fold cross-validation approach

REE measurements were using IC (Cosmed, Quark RMR 2.0, Indirect Calorimetry Lab, Italy). A standard protocol for conducting the measurement was followed (Schlein & Coulter, 2014);(P. Singer & Singer, 2016); (Taku Oshima et al., 2016). Before each measurement, the metabolic monitor was allowed to warm up for 30 min, and then gas and flowmeter calibrations were performed by an experienced dietitian or healthcare professional. The REE was recorded after a 30 min non-fasting steady state according to RMR protocol and manufacturer instructions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants measured resting energy expenditure for the development of predictive equations
Time Frame: 24 months
predictive equations for the estimation of energy requirement among mechanically ventilated critically ill patients among Malaysian population.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The validity of several predictive equations by using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) test
Time Frame: 24 months
predictive equations used to predict REE in critically ill adult patients among Malaysian population by using indirect calorimetry (IC) as the reference standard.
24 months
Determine metabolic determinants
Time Frame: 24 months
metabolic determinants that might influence resting energy expenditure among mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.
24 months
The best regression equation model
Time Frame: 24 months
Regression equation model for predicting energy requirement of mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.
24 months
Determine and compare REE measured by IC among mechanically ventilated critically ill patients
Time Frame: 24 months
during early phase (staying ≤ 5 days), late phase (staying 6-10 days) and chronic phase (staying > 10 days) in ICU.
24 months
The association of REE in critically ill patients with clinical outcome
Time Frame: 24 months
Clinical outcome are hospital mortality and ICU mortality in 28 days and 60 days, length of mechanical ventilation in hours, duration of ICU stay in days and infectious complications such as Hospital acquired infection.
24 months
The association of REE in critically ill patients with quality of life
Time Frame: 24 months
Questionnaire SF-36v2 Health Survey to measure quality of life for critically ill patients.
24 months
The association of REE in critically ill patients with nutrition risk
Time Frame: 24 months
NUTRIC score to quantify the nutrition risk of critically ill patients developing adverse events
24 months
The energy and protein adequacy in relation to patient outcome.
Time Frame: 24 months
Energy and protein adequacy in terms of Energy/Nitrogen ratio in relation to patient outcome.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pei Chien Tah, University of Malaya Medical Centre

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 13, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 24, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20161024-4407

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

Clinical Trials on Indirect Calorimetry

3
Subscribe