Prognostic Value of SPECT-CT Quantitative Indices for the Response Assessment of Bone Metastatic Prostate Carcinoma (INTEVOPROSTATE)

July 20, 2018 updated by: University Hospital, Brest
Prognostic interest of bone scintigraphy in bone metastatic prostate carcinoma (BMPC) has been shown. Recent technological advances allow to perform quantitative bone SPECT-CT in routine practice. The aim of this study is to assess the prognostic interest of quantitative bone SPECT-CT in BMPC.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Prostate adenocarcinoma is one of the most common cancer in men, and bone its most frequent distant metastasis location. 5-year survival has greatly increased these last two decades, with wide differences between countries. Nevertheless, the prognosis of castrate-resistant bone metastatic prostate cancer (BMPC) remains poor.

PCWG (Prostate Cancer Working Group) 2 has proposed in 2007 criteria to evaluate response to treatment for prostate cancer. There are based on composite data, including clinical signs (such as general condition and bone pain), Prostatic Specific Antigen (PSA) variation, CT scan (RECIST criteria) and bone scan. The scintigraphic part is based on whole body planar acquisition, and on the assessment of new uptakes. These bone scan criteria are simplistic, because only a visual analysis is possible, without consideration of changes in intensity. Moreover, these criteria consider the bone scan as a planar imaging, and it has been shown that Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) improved sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values in oncologic context. Finally, "PCWG2 (Prostate Cancer Working Group 2) recognizes that there are no validated criteria for response on radionuclide bone scan".

To reflect bone metastasis burden, a quantitative analysis method for bone scintigraphy, the Bone Scan Index (BSI), had been tested. BSI is based on the uptake of whole body planar imaging. While baseline BSI seemed to offer a poor correlation with overall survival (OS), on-treatment changes in BSI appeared to be a decent response marker. But a volumetric quantitative biomarker may improve the accuracy of this assessment.

The recent development of a new SPECT quantification tool (xSPECT Quant® tool, Siemens) could offer good performances on therapeutic assessment. The objective of this study is to assess the interest of this new quantitative volumetric method in bone scan response evaluation of BMPC.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Brest, France, 29609
        • CHRU de Brest

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Bone metastatic prostate cancer Quantitative bone SPECT-CT available

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients who underwent a bone SPECT-CT (Symbia INTEVO T6) between april 2014 and april 2017, with bone metastatic prostate cancer.

No opposition of the patient to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

Opposition of the patient. Age<18 y/o

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prognostic interest of the quantitative therapeutic evaluation with bone SPECT-CT in bone metastatic prostate cancer
Time Frame: 3 years
Assessment of prognostic quantitative SPECT-CT parameters
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation between baseline quantitative bone SPECT-CT values and baseline PSA
Time Frame: 3 years
Assessment of correlation between baseline PSA and baseline quantitative SPECT-CT parameters (SUVmax (max Standardized Uptake Value) of the target lesions, SUVpeak of the highest uptake lesion, Neoplastic Osteoblastic Metabolism Volume, Total Lesion Osteoblastic Metabolism) (Spearman coefficient)
3 years
Correlation between baseline quantitative bone SPECT-CT values and survival
Time Frame: 3 years
Assessment of correlation between survival (Progression Free Survival, Overall Survival, Disease Specific Survival) and baseline quantitative SPECT-CT parameters (SUVmax of the target lesions, SUVpeak of the highest uptake lesion, Neoplastic Osteoblastic Metabolism Volume, Total Lesion Osteoblastic Metabolism)
3 years
Correlation between variations of quantitative bone SPECT-CT values and variations of PSA
Time Frame: 3 years
Assessment of correlation between variations of PSA and variations of quantitative SPECT-CT parameters (SUVmax of the target lesions, SUVpeak of the highest uptake lesion, Neoplastic Osteoblastic Metabolism Volume, Total Lesion Osteoblastic Metabolism) (Spearman coefficient)
3 years
Correlation between variations of quantitative bone SPECT-CT values and survival
Time Frame: 3 years
Assessment of correlation between survival (Progression Free Survival, Overall Survival, Disease Specific Survival) and variations of quantitative SPECT-CT parameters (SUVmax of the target lesions, SUVpeak of the highest uptake lesion, Neoplastic Osteoblastic Metabolism Volume, Total Lesion Osteoblastic Metabolism)
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

University Hospital, Brest

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 26, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • INTEVO-PROSTATE (29BRC17.0189)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Romania

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe