Bayesian Hemodynamics Model for Personalized Monitoring of Congestive Heart Failure Patients

February 26, 2019 updated by: DouweEAtsma, Leiden University Medical Center

Bayesian Hemodynamics Model for Personalized Monitoring of Congestive Heart Failure Patients - Translating Physician's Reasoning Into Computational Models, Part II

Heart failure (HF) is a serious and challenging syndrome. Globally 26 million people are living with this chronic disease and the prevalence is still increasing. Besides this growing number in prevalence, HF is also responsible for almost 1 million hospitalizations a year in the US and in Europe. Consequently, this has a major economic impact especially due to recurrent admissions of these patients. Adequate prediction of decompensation could prevent (un)necessary admissions as a result of heart failure. Philips is developing a Bayesian Hemodynamics model for general practitioners. This model uses different observables, which can be measured at home. The outcome of the model could be used as an aid in clinical decision making in HF patients.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Heart failure (HF) is a world-wide problem. At the moment 26 million people are living with this chronic disease and the prevalence is still increasing. Besides this growing number in prevalence, HF is also responsible for almost 1 million hospitalizations a year in the US and in Europe. Consequently, this has also a major economic impact especially due to recurrent admissions of these patients. Adequate prediction of decompensation could prevent (un)necessary admissions as a result of heart failure. Philips is developing a Bayesian model for chronic heart failure, enabling monitoring of patients with heart failure in the hospital and at home. An important characteristic of such a Bayesian model is that it is a knowledge-based model, in contrast to data-mining based models, and requires only a few patient data to get started (10-20 patients). Another important characteristic is that these 'knowledge-based models' are applicable in any setting, again in contrast to data-mining based models. This makes the proposed model different from conventional data-mining approaches to modelling. During a hospital admission, the model will be "filled in" with personal patient data. Subsequently, during the rest of the hospital stay or after release from the hospital, a number of symptoms and lab measurement variables ("observables"), will be the input for the model. The output of the model (the result) will be a probability of improvement (versus worsening) of the condition of the patient or the status of the heart failure condition on a scale (from 1-10). The model can deal with less input variables than the number it has been "personalized" with. With less input measurements, naturally the reliability of the result will be reduced. This modelling approach basically captures the clinical way of thinking into a model. If interpreted in the right way using smart Bayesian modelling, the GP or geriatrician will be able to monitor and treat the majority of heart failure patients. This fits in current thinking to reduce HC costs by keeping patients at home and out of the hospital.

The clinical investigation is designed to evaluate whether the outcome of the "Bayesian Hemodynamics model" compares with the cardiologist's status assessment. The purpose of this study is to validate the computer model that has been developed to assess the status of a heart failure patient. With the model, the investigators aim to support healthcare professionals with early detection of deterioration of heart failure patients and with providing the right treatment when it is needed. If successful, this could help heart failure patients to stay at home longer and reduce hospital admissions.

The clinical literature review is documented in report, Personalized Heart Failure Monitoring using a Bayesian network, Anja v.d. Stolpe, Wim Verhaegh, Folke Noertemann, PR-TN 2017/00180.

This clinical investigation is needed, because no complete datasets, including ground truth assessments by cardiologists, are available, neither in existing databases, nor in clinical literature.

The clinical investigation needs to be performed on a population that fulfills the inclusion/exclusion criteria described in Chapter 6, because the "Bayesian Hemodynamics model" is only valid for these cases.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Zuid Holland
      • Leiden, Zuid Holland, Netherlands, 2333 ZA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consists of patients who are admitted to the ward due to congestive heart failure. All patients are admitted at the department of cardiology in the LUMC.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 45 years of age
  • Able to communicate in Dutch
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent
  • Echocardiographically confirmed measurement of ejection fraction
  • Daily obtained physical exam during hospital stay
  • Lab investigations 3x / week
  • Available treatment and medication information

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Incomplete admission data
  • Cardiac asthma patients that need invasive respiratory aid

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Validate Bayesian Hemodynamics model 'Sherlock'
Time Frame: 1 year
Based on all measurements of the physical examination, lab results and echocardiogram, a patient will receive a score (scale 1-10 in which 1 is no heart failure and 10 is the worst possible state) by both the cardiologist as well as 'Sherlock'.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 28, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NL61810.058.17

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Bayesian network 'Sherlock'

3
Subscribe