- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03640507
Vaginal Preparation With Chlorhexidine-alcohol vs. Povidine-iodine vs. Saline
May 29, 2020 updated by: Yiping Weng Han, Columbia University
The Effect of Vaginal Preparation With Chlorhexidine-alcohol vs. Povidine-iodine vs. Saline on Vaginal Bacteria Colony Counts in Pregnant Women
The purpose of this study is to see whether chlorhexidine is superior to povidine-iodine vaginal antisepsis at reducing bacteria colony counts in pregnant women by comparing three groups: vaginal washing with chlorhexidine-alcohol, vaginal washing with povidine-iodine, and vaginal washing with saline alone.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a prospective trial of vaginal preparation (or vaginal cleansing/washing) on late preterm and term pregnancies admitted to Labor & Delivery unit for cesarean delivery with three arms.
Randomization allocation would be performed in 1:1:1 fashion for vaginal preparation with chlorhexidine-alcohol, povidine-iodine, and saline washes.
A saline wash group is included to determine if the act of cleansing the vagina with a sponge alone reduces bacterial colony counts.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
30
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10032
- New York Presbyterian Hospital at Columbia University and Children's Hospital of New York
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Intervention Group (vaginal preparation)
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant women admitted for cesarean delivery
- Gestational age greater than or equal to 34 weeks
Exclusion Criteria:
- Rupture of membranes or active labor
- Chorioamnionitis (prior to enrollment)
- Recent (within 4 weeks) antibiotic exposure
- Maternal HIV infection or immunocompromised state
- Known allergy to shellfish, iodine, or chlorhexidine
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Chlorhexidine-alcohol
Subjects will receive vaginal preparation with chlorhexidine-alcohol.
|
Intervention is a 30-second vaginal preparation or topical wash with three chlorhexidine-alcohol 0.5% solution-soaked sponge sticks.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Povidine-iodine
Subjects will receive vaginal preparation with povidine-iodine.
|
Intervention is a 30-second vaginal preparation or topical wash with three povidine-iodine 10% solution-soaked sponge sticks.
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Saline
Subjects will receive vaginal preparation with sterile saline.
|
Intervention is a 30-second vaginal preparation or topical wash with three sterile saline-soaked sponge sticks.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Post-intervention Aerobic Bacterial Colony Counts
Time Frame: From intervention to 7 days post
|
Vaginal cultures are collected after the vaginal preparation intervention.
These undergo serial dilutions and are incubated on Tryptic Soy Agar for seven days.
Bacteria colony counts were determined by blinded investigators on day 7.
|
From intervention to 7 days post
|
|
Post-intervention Anaerobic Bacterial Colony Counts
Time Frame: From intervention to 7 days post
|
Vaginal cultures are collected after the vaginal preparation intervention.
These undergo serial dilutions and are incubated on Tryptic Soy Agar for seven days.
Bacteria colony counts were determined by blinded investigators on day 7.
|
From intervention to 7 days post
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Baseline Aerobic Bacterial Colony Counts
Time Frame: From intervention to 7 days post
|
Vaginal cultures are collected immediately prior to the vaginal preparation intervention.
These undergo serial dilutions and are incubated on Tryptic Soy Agar for seven days.
Bacteria colony counts were determined by blinded investigators on day 7.
|
From intervention to 7 days post
|
|
Baseline Anaerobic Bacterial Colony Counts
Time Frame: From intervention to 7 days post
|
Vaginal cultures are collected immediately prior to the vaginal preparation intervention.
These undergo serial dilutions and are incubated on Tryptic Soy Agar for seven days.
Bacteria colony counts were determined by blinded investigators on day 7.
|
From intervention to 7 days post
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Diagnosed With Postpartum Infections.
Time Frame: Up to six weeks postpartum
|
Chart review to assess any maternal infections diagnosed during postpartum hospitalization or at the time of the postpartum visit.
|
Up to six weeks postpartum
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Yiping Han, PhD, Columbia University Department of Microbiology and Immunology
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Haas DM, Morgan S, Contreras K, Kimball S. Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 26;4(4):CD007892. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007892.pub7.
- Duffy CR, Garcia-So J, Ajemian B, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Han YW. A randomized trial of the bactericidal effects of chlorhexidine vs povidone-iodine vaginal preparation. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 Aug;2(3):100114. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100114. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 1, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 8, 2019
Study Completion (Actual)
June 14, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 17, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 17, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
August 21, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 9, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 29, 2020
Last Verified
May 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- AAAR4891
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Surgical Site Infection
-
Gundersen Lutheran Medical FoundationGundersen Lutheran Health SystemCompletedSurgical Site Infection | Superficial Surgical Site Infection | Deep Surgical Site Infection | Organ/Space Surgical Site InfectionUnited States
-
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research CenterEnrolling by invitationSurgical Site Infections | Surgical Site Infection After Major SurgerySaudi Arabia
-
Singapore General HospitalNovem Healthcare Pte LtdTerminatedSuperficial Surgical Site InfectionSingapore
-
Halmstad County HospitalCompleted
-
Region SkaneVinnovaCompleted
-
MinaPharm PharmaceuticalsRecruitingSurgical Site InfectionsEgypt
-
Karolinska University HospitalStockholm South General HospitalRecruitingPostoperative Surgical Site InfectionSweden
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompleted
-
Population Health Research InstituteCompletedSurgical Site InfectionsCanada
-
University of RochesterSage Products, Inc.Completed
Clinical Trials on Chlorhexidine-alcohol
-
Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad del BajioUniversidad de GuanajuatoCompleted
-
Universidad Complutense de MadridUnknownIngrown ToenailSpain
-
National and Kapodistrian University of AthensCompletedPeriodontitis | Wound Healing
-
Alexandria UniversityRecruitingNeonatal SepsisEgypt
-
IsalaCompletedThird Molars ExtractionNetherlands
-
Solventum US LLC3MCompletedBacterial Recovery of Skin Flora Post-product Application
-
Solventum US LLC3MCompletedBacterial Reduction on Skin Flora Post-product ApplicationUnited States
-
Ain Shams UniversityRecruiting
-
Zurex Pharma, Inc.CompletedSurgical Site InfectionUnited States