Effectiveness of Lavage With Alcohol - Chlorhexidine for Chemical Matricectomy

April 30, 2013 updated by: Ricardo Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Effectiveness of the Lavage With 70% Alcohol Plus 0.5% Chlorhexidine Compared to 70% Alcohol for Chemical Matricectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Ingrown Toenails

To compare the efficacy of the lavage with 70% alcohol plus 0.5% chlorhexidine versus 70% alcohol in the surgical treatment of ingrown toenails.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of the lavage with 70% alcohol plus 0.5% chlorhexidine versus 70% alcohol during the phenolization procedure in the surgical treatment of ingrown toenails in patients undergoing for chemical matricectomy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Recruiting
        • Universidad Complutense de Madrid (Podología)
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ricardo Berceo, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Older than 18 with onychocryptosis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • infection, history of tinea pedis, onychomycosis, paronychia, nail trauma or subungual hematoma, nail deformities and disorders, peripheral vascular disease or diabetes, cardiac disease, history of rheumatic fever, recent antibiotic use or current antimicrobial therapy, history of steroid use and recent nail polish use

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: alcohol - clorhexidine
Ingrown toenail irrigated using 70% alcohol - 0.5% clorhexidine
In the intervention group five rounds of 3 ml wash of 70% alcohol - 0.5% clorhexidine was used to irrigate the exposed area of the nail to neutralize any residual effect of phenol and found out how much residual phenol is still in the wound.
Other Names:
  • chlorhexidine-gluconate
Active Comparator: 70% alcohol
Ingrown toenail irrigated using 70% alcohol
After phenolization of the ingrown toenail the wound is irrigated with 15 cc solution of 70% alcohol plus 0.5% clorhexidine
Other Names:
  • Ethanol
  • Isopropilic alcohol.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantity of phenol recovered in each lavage with each solution
Time Frame: up to 2 weeks
The amounts of phenol in the samples were quantified by a Jasco modular high performance liquid chromatograph HPLC (Jasco International Co Ltd, Japan) equipped with a LG-2080-04 quaternary low-gradient unit, a PU-2080 pump, a DG-2080-54 degasser, an AS-2050-plus autosampler and a UV-2070 plus UV/Vis detector was used. A C18 column Luna (particle size 3 µm, 150 x 4.6 mm) (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) was selected for the chromatographic separation of the components, adjusting the column temperature to 30 °C (LC Ni-II/ADC oven).
up to 2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ricardo Becerro de Bengoa, Phd, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2013

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 11, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

May 1, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 1, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2013

Last Verified

April 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ingrown Toenail

Clinical Trials on 70% alcohol - 0.5% clorhexidine

Subscribe