Study of Innate Host Immune Response to C. Glabrata Clinical Isolates Resistant to Echinocandins: Impact on the Management of Candidemia in High-risk Patients (CAHOHR)

August 28, 2018 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon

In the context of Candida yeast infections, a large number of studies have been published over the past two decades specifying the molecular mechanisms of antifungal resistance in different Candida species. However, few of these studies have explored how these mechanisms influence host immune response to this opportunistic pathogen. Recent advances in understanding how the host's immune system responds to Candida have initiated the emergence of a new research theme aimed at better understanding Candida's intrinsic and adaptive resistance mechanisms to antifungals can modulate "escape to" or "recognition by" the host's immune system. This knowledge could lead to (i) a better understanding of the predominance of certain Candida species with antifungal resistance in certain patient populations, (ii) a better understanding of why high levels of in vitro resistance are not necessarily correlated with in vivo therapeutic failure, and (iii) effective immunotherapeutic strategies to control Candida resistance to antifungals.

It is therefore crucial to investigate the impact of Candida's resistance to antifungals on the host's innate immune response. Indeed, most antifungal resistance mechanisms have a direct or indirect structural modification of the fungal wall. However, it is the composition of this wall that is involved in the recognition of Candida by the host cell via the pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). We therefore put forward the very probable hypothesis that changes in the fungal wall, induced by the appearance of resistance, could alter the recognition of Candida by PRRs and thus trigger a different immune response, either qualitatively (type of cytokines secreted) or quantitatively (amplitude and duration of the immune response). However, even if initial experimental data support the hypothesis of a possible link between resistance and a modulation of the innate immune response in digestive mucosa (the most frequent starting point for disseminated candidiasis), many questions remain regarding (i) the proteins and mechanisms of the modulated immune cascade, (ii) the modification of the immune response according to the Candida species in question and (iii) the modification of the immune response according to the resistance phenotype in question.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dijon, France, 21000
        • Chu Dijon Bourogne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Collection from the "multicentric study of Echinocandin-resistance in Candida glabrata candidemia" (multicentre retrospective study on a cohort of 172 patients managed for a C. glabrata cadidemia between 2013 and 2015).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 10 clinical isolates sensitive to all antifungal agents
  • 10 echinocandin-resistant clinical isolates (Eucast, caspofungin > 8µg/ml)

Clinical strains of C. glabrata susceptible or resistant to echinocandins will be selected on selected criteria:

  • patient's immune status
  • therapeutic management
  • clinical developments

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not applicable

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Reference strain ATCC
1 strain sensitive to all antifungals
  1. study of the expression of genes coding for different proteins involved in the RTqPCR activation cascade
  2. study of protein expression by the Western-Blot method
  1. in vitro evaluation by measuring cell invasion, cell adhesion and by determining epithelial cell cytotoxicity.
  2. in vivo evaluation measured by a survival study on a CD-1 mouse model.
Clinical isolates sensitive to all antifungal agents
10 clinical isolates sensitive to all
  1. study of the expression of genes coding for different proteins involved in the RTqPCR activation cascade
  2. study of protein expression by the Western-Blot method
  1. in vitro evaluation by measuring cell invasion, cell adhesion and by determining epithelial cell cytotoxicity.
  2. in vivo evaluation measured by a survival study on a CD-1 mouse model.
Echinocandin-resistant clinical isolates
10 echinocandin-resistant clinical isolates (Eucast, Caspofungin > 8µg/ml)
  1. study of the expression of genes coding for different proteins involved in the RTqPCR activation cascade
  2. study of protein expression by the Western-Blot method
  1. in vitro evaluation by measuring cell invasion, cell adhesion and by determining epithelial cell cytotoxicity.
  2. in vivo evaluation measured by a survival study on a CD-1 mouse model.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantification of accession and invasion
Time Frame: Baseline
In vitro study of different virulence markers
Baseline
Test SytoxOrange
Time Frame: Baseline
In vitro study of different cytotoxicity markers in digestive epithelial cells
Baseline
Quantification of the gene expression of the various cytokines associated with the immune response in digestive epithelial cells.
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 28, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Candidemia of C. Glabrata

Clinical Trials on in vitro evaluation of epithelial immune response during C. glabrata infection

Subscribe