Efficacy Study of Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients With Treatment Resistant Major Depression (FORESEE III)

November 2, 2022 updated by: Thomas E. Schlaepfer, Prof. Dr., University Hospital Freiburg

Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess Efficacy of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the slMFB in Patients With Treatment Resistant Major Depression

The primary objective of this multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled, double blind (patient and observer blinded) clinical trial is to assess the antidepressant effect of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in patients with treatment resistant major depression using the Boston Scientific implantable Vercise™ GEVIA™ DBS system compared to sham.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The main objective of this clinical trial is to assess the putative antidepressant efficacy of a therapeutic method called Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in patients suffering from severe, treatment-resistant depression, i.e. in patients who have not sufficiently improved under established antidepressant therapies (such as psychotherapy, antidepressant drug therapy, and electroconvulsive therapy).

DBS, also known as "brain pacemaker" therapy, is a neurosurgical therapeutic method that is widely established for the treatment of other conditions such as Parkinson's disease. However, DBS is not yet approved for the treatment of patients with depression.

In order to initiate DBS treatment, a neurosurgical procedure is performed in which electrodes are placed in a brain region termed 'medial forebrain bundle' (MFB). The electrodes are then used to stimulate this region with electric pulses. From previous investigations and studies with small numbers of patients, it is believed that DBS might have a positive effect on depressive symptoms in patients treated with the method.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

47

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Grenoble, France, 38043
        • Recruiting
        • Université Grenoble Alpes
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mircea Polosan, Prof
    • Baden-Württemberg
      • Freiburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 79106
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Freiburg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Major depression (MD), severe, unipolar, or bipolar in an acute depression episode.
  2. German mother tongue or fluent.
  3. Male or female patients ≥20 and ≤75 years.
  4. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-28) score of >21.
  5. Global Assessment of Function (GAF) score of <45.
  6. At least 4 episodes of depression or one chronic episode >2 years.
  7. Failure to respond to

    1. adequate trials of primary antidepressants from at least 3 different classes (>5 weeks at the maximum recommended or tolerated dose) and
    2. adequate trials of augmentation/combination of a primary antidepressant (>3 weeks at the usually recommended or maximum tolerated dose) using at least 2 different augmenting/combination agents (lithium, T3, stimulants, neuroleptics, anticonvulsants, buspirone, or a second primary antidepressant) and
    3. an adequate trial of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) (>6 treatments) and an adequate trial of individual psychotherapy (>20 sessions with an experienced psychotherapist).
  8. Able to give written informed consent.
  9. Compliance to participate in the study.
  10. Drug free or on stable drug regimen at least 6 weeks before study entry.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current or past non-affective psychotic disorder.
  2. Any current clinically significant neurological disorder or medical illness affecting brain function, other than motor tics or Gilles de la Tourette syndrome.
  3. Any clinically significant abnormality on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), any contraindications to perform a planned MRI to visualize the slMFB.
  4. Any surgical contraindications to undergoing DBS like deformed or displaced or not discernable target region, scarring after brain disease (infarction), need for continuous anticoagulation that cannot be bridged in order to obtain normal coagulation, present risks for anesthesia or any brain or scalp injury (even after intracranial surgery).
  5. Current or unstably remitted substance abuse (aside from nicotine).
  6. Pregnancy, women of childbearing age not using effective contraception and breast feeding women.
  7. History of severe personality disorder.
  8. Acute suicidal ideation.
  9. Patients with advanced stage cardiovascular disease.
  10. Patients under immunosuppressive or chemo therapy because of malignant disease.
  11. Patients who had previous intracranial surgery.
  12. Patients who are currently under DBS therapy or have implanted any kind of stimulator already.
  13. Patients with aneurysm clips.
  14. Patients with cochlear implants.
  15. Patients with planned diathermy.
  16. Persons who are in a relationship of dependence/employment with the sponsor or the investigator.
  17. Simultaneous participation or previous participation within 30 days prior to start of screening in a clinical trial involving investigational medicinal product(s) or investigational medical device(s).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A: DBS onset in week 1

Implantation of Vercise GEVIA deep brain stimulation (DBS) system. DBS onset in week 1.

2ND STAGE: After 6 months DBS ON, patients will be assessed whether they are responders or non-responders. In the subgroup of eligible responders, patients will be randomized to either DBS OFF* (for max. 3 months) or continued DBS for another 6 months. *DBS OFF until worsening of clinical depression, event (defined as > 5 points augmentation in MADRS in two consecutive visits) or for a maximum of 3 months. After DBS OFF, re-onset of DBS will be performed, followed by 6 months continuous DBS.

Non-responders will also receive another 6 months DBS therapy in the 2nd stage. At sites other than Freiburg/Bonn, the 2nd stage consists of 6 months DBS therapy only.

DBS to the superolateral branch of the Medial Forebrain Bundle (slMFB)
Sham Comparator: Group B: DBS off, followed by DBS onset in week 17

Implantation of Vercise GEVIA deep brain stimulation (DBS) system. 4 months OFF after implantation followed by DBS onset in first week of month 5.

2ND STAGE: See group A.

DBS to the superolateral branch of the Medial Forebrain Bundle (slMFB)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score
Time Frame: 16 weeks after surgery

Primary outcome (Efficacy). MADRS is an established instrument to rate symptoms of depression. The questionnaire includes questions on the following symptoms 1. Apparent sadness 2. Reported sadness 3. Inner tension 4. Reduced sleep 5. Reduced appetite 6. Concentration difficulties 7. Lassitude 8. Inability to feel 9. Pessimistic thoughts 10. Suicidal thoughts Each of the 10 items yields a score of 0 to 6. These item scores are summed up to yield a total score. The range of the total score is thus 0 to 60; higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

Usual cutoff points are:

0 to 6 - normal/symptom absent; 7 to 19 - mild depression; 20 to 34 - moderate depression; >34 - severe depression

16 weeks after surgery
Time to Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) augmentation of >5 points or clinical worsening in two consecutive visits after DBS termination
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
Primary outcome in 2nd stage; Description MADRS: see above.
Up to 3 months
Assessment of (Serious) Adverse Events related to Investigational Medical Device and / or surgical procedures
Time Frame: From IMD implantation until the end of study; assessed up to 77 weeks
Primary outcome (Safety); (Serious) adverse events seen will be reported using standard descriptive statistical methods.
From IMD implantation until the end of study; assessed up to 77 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-28) total score
Time Frame: 16 weeks after surgery

HDRS is an established instrument to rate symptoms of depression. Different versions exist, using between 17 and 29 items. In this study, the 28-item version (HDRS-28) is used. The patient is rated by a clinician, items are scored either on a 3-point or 5-point Likert-type scale.

Single item scores are summed up to yield a total score. The total score ranges from 0 to 85; a higher total score indicates more severe depressive symptoms.

16 weeks after surgery
Clinical Global Impression Score (CGI) total score
Time Frame: 16 weeks after surgery
The CGI is a scale that measures the global severity of illness, the global improvement relative to the beginning of the study as well as the therapeutic effect and adverse reactions, score ranges from 0 to 7 for severity of illness and global improvement, a higher score indicates more severe symptoms and a worsening of symptoms; score ranges from 0 to 8 for the efficacy index, 0 means that the efficacy can't be evaluated, a score of 2 means best efficacy while a score of 8 means no therapeutic effect and more adverse reactions
16 weeks after surgery
Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) total score
Time Frame: 16 weeks after surgery
Score ranges from 100 (high functioning) to 1 (severly impaired)
16 weeks after surgery
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) total score
Time Frame: 16 weeks after surgery
Score ranges from 0 to 63; a higher total score indicates more severe depressive symptoms
16 weeks after surgery
36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) total score
Time Frame: 16 weeks after surgery
Health-related quality of life questionnaire; 8 subscales: General health perceptions, physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, vitality, general mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, social functioning. The score in each subscale ranges from 0 to 100; subscores add up to two total scores, "physical health" and "mental health", each with a score range of 0-400. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
16 weeks after surgery
Change over time in HDRS total score after DBS surgery with DB stimulation OFF compared to stimulation ON
Time Frame: assessed weekly for 16 weeks after surgery
HDRS: see above
assessed weekly for 16 weeks after surgery
Change over time in CGI total score after DBS surgery with DB stimulation OFF compared to stimulation ON
Time Frame: assessed weekly for 16 weeks after surgery
CGI: see above
assessed weekly for 16 weeks after surgery
Change over time in GAF total score after DBS surgery with DB stimulation OFF compared to stimulation ON
Time Frame: assessed weekly for 16 weeks after surgery
GAF: see above
assessed weekly for 16 weeks after surgery
Change over time in BDI-II total score after DBS surgery with DB stimulation OFF compared to stimulation ON
Time Frame: assessed weekly for 16 weeks after surgery
BDI-II: see above
assessed weekly for 16 weeks after surgery
Change over time in SF-36 total score after DBS surgery with DB stimulation OFF compared to stimulation ON
Time Frame: assessed weekly for 16 weeks after surgery
SF-36: see above
assessed weekly for 16 weeks after surgery
Neuropsychological Assessments: Rey Complex Figure Test (CFT)
Time Frame: at 4 months after implantation
Score range 0-36, higher scores indicate better cognitive performance
at 4 months after implantation
Neuropsychological Assessments: d2 concentration test (d2)
Time Frame: at 4 months after implantation
Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance (total of right answers minus errors)
at 4 months after implantation
Neuropsychological Assessments: 5-Point-Test
Time Frame: at 4 months after implantation
Score range 0-35, higher scores indicate better cognitive performance
at 4 months after implantation
Neuropsychological Assessments: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) (vocabulary, similarities)
Time Frame: at 4 months after implantation
Score range "vocabulary": 0-32, Score range "finding similarities": 0-32, higher scores indicate better cognitive performance
at 4 months after implantation
Neuropsychological Assessments: Mini-Mental-Status-Test (MMST)
Time Frame: at 4 months after implantation
Score range 0-30, higher scores indicate better cognitive performance
at 4 months after implantation
Neuropsychological Assessments: Multiple-Choice Vocabulary Intelligence Test (MWT-B)
Time Frame: at 4 months after implantation
Score range 0-37, higher scores indicate better cognitive performance
at 4 months after implantation
Neuropsychological Assessments: Rey Visual Design Learning Test (RVDLT)
Time Frame: at 4 months after implantation
Score range 0-75, higher scores indicate better cognitive performance
at 4 months after implantation
Neuropsychological Assessments: Word Fluency Test
Time Frame: at 4 months after implantation
No maximum scores, patient has two minutes to produce answers, higher scores indicate better cognitive performance
at 4 months after implantation
Neuropsychological Assessments: Stroop-Test
Time Frame: at 4 months after implantation
Time in s, low scores (less seconds) indicate better cognitive performance
at 4 months after implantation
Neuropsychological Assessments: Test for Attentional Performance (TAP)
Time Frame: at 4 months after implantation
Reaction times as well as correct or false responses and omissions are measured, higher cognitive performance is indicated by fast responses, few errors and high no. of correct responses
at 4 months after implantation
Neuropsychological Assessments: Trail-Making Test (TMT)
Time Frame: at 4 months after implantation
Time in s, low scores (less seconds) indicate better cognitive performance
at 4 months after implantation
Neuropsychological Assessments: Verbal Memory and Learning Ability Test
Time Frame: at 4 months after implantation
Score range 0-75, higher scores indicate better cognitive performance
at 4 months after implantation
Neuropsychological Assessments: Hopper Visual Organization Test (VOT)
Time Frame: at 4 months after implantation
Score range 0-30, higher scores indicate better cognitive performance
at 4 months after implantation
Neuropsychological Assessments: Digit-Span and Block-Span Test
Time Frame: at 4 months after implantation
Score range 0-12 for each of for dimensions: Digit span forward, digit span backward, block span forward, block span backward. Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance
at 4 months after implantation
MADRS total score during long-term follow-up compared to baseline
Time Frame: at 12 months stimulation
MADRS: see above
at 12 months stimulation
HDRS total score during long-term follow-up compared to baseline
Time Frame: at 12 months stimulation
see above
at 12 months stimulation
CGI total score
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 months DB stimulation compared to baseline
see above
at 6 and 12 months DB stimulation compared to baseline
GAF total score
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 months DB stimulation compared to baseline
see above
at 6 and 12 months DB stimulation compared to baseline
BDI-II total score
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 months DB stimulation compared to baseline
see above
at 6 and 12 months DB stimulation compared to baseline
SF-36 total score
Time Frame: at 6 and 12 months DB stimulation compared to baseline
see above
at 6 and 12 months DB stimulation compared to baseline
Neuropsychological Assessments: Rey Complex Figure Test (CFT)
Time Frame: at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
see above
at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
Neuropsychological Assessments: d2 concentration test (d2)
Time Frame: at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
see above
at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
Neuropsychological Assessments: 5-Point-Test
Time Frame: at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
see above
at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
Neuropsychological Assessments: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) (vocabulary, similarities)
Time Frame: at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
see above
at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
Neuropsychological Assessments: Mini-Mental-Status-Test (MMST)
Time Frame: at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
see above
at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
Neuropsychological Assessments: Multiple-Choice Vocabulary Intelligence Test (MWT-B)
Time Frame: at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
see above
at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
Neuropsychological Assessments: Rey Visual Design Learning Test (RVDLT)
Time Frame: at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
see above
at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
Neuropsychological Assessments: Word Fluency Test
Time Frame: at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
see above
at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
Neuropsychological Assessments: Stroop-Test
Time Frame: at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
see above
at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
Neuropsychological Assessments: Test for Attentional Performance (TAP)
Time Frame: at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
see above
at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
Neuropsychological Assessments: Trail-Making Test (TMT)
Time Frame: at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
see above
at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
Neuropsychological Assessments: Verbal Memory and Learning Ability Test
Time Frame: at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
see above
at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
Neuropsychological Assessments: Hopper Visual Organization Test (VOT)
Time Frame: at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
see above
at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
Neuropsychological Assessments: Digit-Span and Block-Span Test
Time Frame: at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
see above
at 6 months DBS compared to baseline and at end of the study compared to baseline, assessed up to 77 weeks
Incidence of relapse into clinical depression after tapering down of DBS
Time Frame: From discontinuation of DBS until the date of first documented relapse, assessed up to 12 weeks
The incidence of relapse into clinical depression after discontinuation of DBS will be assessed.
From discontinuation of DBS until the date of first documented relapse, assessed up to 12 weeks
Pattern of metabolic activity as measured by FDG-PET at 1 week and 4 months after implantation compared to baseline
Time Frame: at 1 week and 4 months after implantation compared to baseline
Change of metabolic activity in the prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortex as well as in subcortical regions (nucl. accumbens, amygdala) (exploratory endpoint)
at 1 week and 4 months after implantation compared to baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas E Schlaepfer, Prof. Dr., University Hospital Freiburg

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 3, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 2, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 2, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P000767
  • DRKS00014947 (Registry Identifier: German Clinical Trials Register)
  • CIV-17-07-020746 (Other Identifier: Eudamed Number)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Treatment-resistant Depression

Clinical Trials on Vercise GEVIA deep brain stimulation (DBS) system

3
Subscribe