- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03660566
Use of Leucocyte- and Platelet-rich Fibrin Membranes in Single Implant
September 15, 2020 updated by: Maria Aparecida Neves Jardini, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
Use of Leucocyte- and Platelet-rich Fibrin (L-PRF) Membranes in Single Implant Placement on Esthetic Area. Randomized Clinical Trial
The objective of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to evaluate the increase of soft tissue thickness around single implants installed in maxillary esthetic area with the use of Leucocyte-Platelet rich Fibrin (L-PRF) membranes.
The sample is of 42 individuals, where the control group (n = 21) will receive single implant placement only, while the test group will receive single implant placement with L-PRF membranes.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The greatest challenge in implantology is to achieve a satisfactory esthetic result.
A new platelet concentrate protocol, named Leucocyte and platelet-rich Fibrin (L-PRF), has been developed in France.
Research has shown positive results using L-PRF during implant placement, as improving soft tissue healing and bone formation, leading to higher esthetic level and greater implant stability.
The aim of this study is to evaluate if the use of PRF associated to implant placement in esthetic area presents superior aesthetic result and soft tissue thickness increase when compared to implant placement without graft.
Forty-two patients requiring single implant placement in the esthetic area of the maxilla will be randomly divided into test group (implant + L-PRF) and control group (implant without graft).
Surgical procedures will be performed by a single operator.
The rates of soft tissue thickness, esthetic and comfort will be evaluated at baseline and 3 months after the procedure.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
42
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
São Paulo
-
São Jose dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil, 12245 000
- Maria Jardini
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
20 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients of at least 20 years of age, systemically healthy, with satisfactory oral hygiene assessed by plaque index and gingival index of less than 25% (O'Leay et al. 1972).
- Patients requiring single implant placement in anterior maxilla (premolar to premolar)
- Buccal soft tissue thickness of at least 2mm
- Patients who agreed to participate in the study and signed a written consent (Resolution nº196 of October 1996 and the Code of Professional Ethics Dental - C.F.O. - 179/93)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Smokers
- Patients with parafunctional habits, such as bruxism
- Patients who need other types of rehabilitation, such as removable prostheses
- Pregnant or lactating
- Patients with uncontrolled systemic diseases (cardiovascular alterations, blood disorders, diseases that affect bone metabolism, immunodeficiencies, diabetes)
- Patients who use drugs that interfere with wound healing or contraindicate the surgical procedure, such as gingival growth related drugs
- Implants in adjacent regions
- Sites requiring bone augmentation procedure
- Patients in orthodontic treatment
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Test - Implant with L-PRF
Patients requiring single implants placement in the esthetic area of maxilla will receive the implant placement with the use of Leucocyte- and Platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) membranes.
|
The patient's blood will be collected and the tubes (4) will be inserted into a tabletop centrifuge (Kasvi).
Using a 2500rpm for 12 minutes protocol, the leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin clot will be prepared using a kit consisting of a perforated metal box where the clots will be positioned and covered by a metal plaque.
The pressure exerted on the clot will lead to the formation of L-PRF membranes, which will be used to cover the ridge after placement of the implant.
Then, the flap will be sutured.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Control - Implant without L-PRF
Patients requiring single implants placement in the esthetic area of maxilla will receive the implant placement only.
|
Single implant installation surgery in maxillary esthetic area.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Gain of peri-implant soft tissue thickness
Time Frame: Three months
|
A single investigator, who is not the operator, is responsible for the measurements of the patients.
The examiner will be judged calibrated.
The calibration will be made by examination of soft tissue thickness of 5 patients, twice, in a range of 48 hours.
The correlation test will be used to verify the reproducibility of intra-examining measures, with a maximum value of 0.8.
To ensure that the measures at baseline and postoperative evaluation will be performed at the same place, we will use a stent, made of condensation silicone (Optosil - Heraeus Kulzer), so as to cover the edentulous region and the regions of interest described by Zeltner et al. (2017).
During measurements of soft tissue thickness, the stent will be used so that the tissue perforation site will be standardized, according to a marking on its surface.
An endodontic spacer will be used for tissue perforation, and the thickness will be evaluated using a digital caliper.
|
Three months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
a) Plaque index (IP, Ainamo e Bay. 1975)
Time Frame: Three months
|
Assessment of presence or absence of plaque in a dichotomous pattern (0 - absence of visible plaque; 1 - presence of visible plaque);
|
Three months
|
|
b) Gingival bleeding index (IG, Ainamo & Bay, 1975)
Time Frame: Three months
|
Assessment of presence or absence of bleeding in the gingival margin in a dichotomous pattern (0 - no bleeding; 1 - presence of bleeding)
|
Three months
|
|
c) Buccal keratinized tissue thickness (ETQv)
Time Frame: Three months
|
Keratinized tissue thickness measured at the center of the region of interest (RDI) of the buccal surface of the ridge.
To measure the tissue thickness, a guiding device will be made to standardize the region to be measured and then, at a specific point, the mucosa will be punctured with an endodontic spacer and the thickness marked with a rubber marker.
Then, using a digital caliper, the thickness will be measured.
|
Three months
|
|
d) Ridge defect (DR) (ridge valley)
Time Frame: Three months
|
Distance in millimeters from the buccal mucosa to the imaginary line passing through the vestibular bosses of the adjacent teeth, using a periodontal probe.
|
Three months
|
|
e) Soft tissue height (ATM)
Time Frame: Three months
|
Distance from the top of the gingival tissue on the edge of the ridge to the top of the stent, measured using a endodontic spacer with rubber marker to measure height, and then measure with a digital caliper.
|
Three months
|
|
f) Height of keratinized tissue (ATQ)
Time Frame: Three months
|
Vertical distance in millimeters measured on the center of the ridge on the buccal aspect of the edentulous ridge to the mucogingival line, using a periodontal probe.
|
Three months
|
|
g) Distance between the teeth adjacent to the edentulous space (DED)
Time Frame: Three months
|
Measure of the distance between the proximal faces of the teeth adjacent to the edentulous area, using a periodontal probe.
|
Three months
|
|
h) Vestibular bone plate thickness (ETV)
Time Frame: During the surgical procedure
|
The thickness of the buccal bone plate, measured in millimeters, after the perforations of the ridge prior to implant installation.
Measured using photos taken during the surgery.
|
During the surgical procedure
|
|
i) Distance between implant and adjacent teeth (DEID)
Time Frame: During the surgical procedure
|
Measurements between the implant to the adjacent teeth, mesial and distal.
measured using photos taken during the surgery.
|
During the surgical procedure
|
|
j) Distance from the implant to the imaginary line passing by the buccal aspect of the adjacent teeth (DILIV)
Time Frame: During the surgical procedure
|
Measured from the vestibular aspect of the implant to the imaginary line passing through the buccal faces of the adjacent teeth.
Measured using photos taken during the surgery.
|
During the surgical procedure
|
|
k) Distance from the buccal bone plate to the imaginary line of the adjacent teeth (DTOVLI)
Time Frame: During the surgical procedure
|
Measured from the buccal bone plate to the imaginary line of the buccal faces of the adjacent teeth, measured using photos taken during the surgery.
|
During the surgical procedure
|
|
l) Distance from the interproximal bone crest to the cementum-enamel junction of neighboring teeth (DCOJCE)
Time Frame: During the surgical procedure
|
Linear measurement from the top of the bone crest to the JCE of the mesial and distal neighboring teeth to the edentulous space (with a periodontal probe)
|
During the surgical procedure
|
|
m) Evaluation of the periodontal biotype (thin or thick)
Time Frame: Three months
|
Classified on thin or thick periodontal biotype, according to Olsson and Lindhe, 1991 and Kan et al., 2010.
Thin, if the marginal vestibular gingiva is more delicate, the papillae are high and thin and the crown of the central incisors are triangular shaped; Thick if the marginal gingiva is thicker, papillae are short and the central incisors are square shaped.
|
Three months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Aesthetic (based on the patient's opinion)
Time Frame: One year
|
With a hand mirror, the patient will evaluate peri-implant aesthetic immediately after the installation of the final crown and will be asked to mark, on a Visual Analogic scale (VAS), where the left end of the scale will be "very ugly" and the right "very beautiful ".
The right end is the best outcome possible.
|
One year
|
|
Postoperative discomfort
Time Frame: Seven days
|
After the implant installation, the patients will be asked to mark, on a Analogic Visual scale (VAS), the postoperative discomfort, where the scale results are "none" in the left and "extreme", in the right.
The right end is the best outcome possible.
|
Seven days
|
|
Postoperative discomfort (based on analgesics)
Time Frame: Seven days
|
Patients will be asked to report the number of analgesics ingested on a week. Patients should fill out a chart during the first 7 days after the surgery, at home. The best result will be if patients do not take analgesics, or ingested as little as possible, which would show that there was no postoperative pain. |
Seven days
|
|
Evaluation of oral health impact on quality of life, using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) questionnaire.
Time Frame: One year
|
Evaluate the impact of oral health on patient's quality of life before and 1 year after implant installation.
This evaluation will be carried out through the application of a questionnaire with 14 questions (Oral Health Impact Profile: OHIP-14) that assess the patient's perception regarding the impact of oral conditions on their well-being.
|
One year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Maria A Jardini, Doctor, State of São paulo University
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 10, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 21, 2020
Study Completion (Anticipated)
November 20, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 4, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 4, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
September 6, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 16, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 15, 2020
Last Verified
September 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Implante PRF
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.