Randomized Study for the Optimal Treatment of Symptomatic Patients With Low Gradient Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (ROTAS)

February 27, 2023 updated by: Rennes University Hospital

According to current European Recommendations on valvular heart disease (VHD), "classical" severe aortic stenosis (AS) is defined by an aortic valve area (AVA) ≤1 cm2 and indexed AVA ≤0.6 cm2/m2, a mean aortic pressure gradient (MAG) >40 mmHg, and a maximal aortic velocity >4 m/sec.

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is recommended (class I indication) in patients with "classical" severe AS who have any symptoms related to aortic valve disease.

In 2007, Hachicha et al. described a particular pattern of severe AS, characterized by an AVA ≤0.6 cm2/m2, low mean pressure aortic gradient (MAG <40 mmHg), despite the presence of a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥50%). This pattern of AS is encountered in nearly 15-25 % of patients who have severe AS. Typically, these patients are elderly subjects, with several comorbidities, a small left ventricular (LV) cavity with pronounced LV concentric remodeling and a restrictive physiology, leading to a decrease in LV stroke volume despite a preserved LVEF. The diagnosis and management of patients with low gradient severe AS and preserved LVEF are often challenging because:

  1. the presence of a "true" severe aortic stenosis should be carefully confirmed by a multi-modality imaging approach;
  2. the best therapeutic management (AVR versus conservative strategy) of symptomatic patients with low gradient severe AS and preserved LVEF is not clearly established.

In very recently updated European guidelines on the management of VHD, symptomatic patients with low gradient and low flow severe AS and preserved LVEF have only a class IIa-level C indication for AVR. No specific indications are given for the management of symptomatic patients with low gradient and normal flow severe AS. This lack of indications is clearly attributed to a gap in knowledge which requires further investigations to be filled up.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Liège, Belgium
        • CHU Liège
      • Amiens, France
        • CHU Amiens - Picardie
      • Angers, France
        • CHU Angers
      • Brest, France
        • CHU Brest - Hôpital La Cavale Blanche
      • Créteil, France
        • APHP - CHU Henri Mondor
      • Dijon, France
        • Chu Dijon - Hôpital François Mitterrand
      • Lille, France
        • CHU Lille
      • Lorient, France
        • CH Bretagne Sud
      • Marseille, France
        • APHM - Hôpital la Timone
      • Montpellier, France
        • Clinique du Millenaire
      • Nantes, France
        • CHU Nantes
      • Rennes, France, 35000
        • CHU Rennes
      • Saint-Brieuc, France
        • CH Saint-Brieuc
      • Saint-Denis, France
        • Centre Cardiologique du Nord
      • Toulouse, France
        • CHU Toulouse - Hôpital Rangueil
      • Tours, France
        • CHU Tours - Hôpital Trousseau
      • Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
        • CHU Nancy
      • Vannes, France
        • Ch Bretagne Atlantique - site de Vannes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age >18 years
  2. Symptomatic and severe AS defined by an effective AVA ≤1 cm² and indexed AVA ≤0.6 cm2/m2
  3. LVEF ≥50%
  4. MAG <40 mm Hg (measure confirmed by the multi-window continuous-wave Doppler interrogation and use of Pedoff probe)
  5. Confirmation of the presence of severe AS at DSE and MDCT aortic calcium score
  6. Feasibility of AVR by surgery or TAVR according to the "heart team"
  7. Signature of an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Uncontrolled atrial of ventricular arrhythmias
  2. Patient having a life expectancy <1 year, independently from their aortic pathology
  3. Coronary artery disease necessitating a percutaneous or surgical revascularisation
  4. Presence of a concomitant valve disease needing surgical treatment
  5. Patient who are included in another research protocol
  6. Protected person (adults legally protected (under judicial protection, guardianship or supervision), person deprived of their liberty, pregnant woman, lactating woman and minor)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: aortic valve replacement
aortic valve replacement surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (will be decided by the heart team before randomization)
Active Comparator: strict clinical surveillance
strict clinical surveillance strategy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
time from randomization to first occurrence of any of the components of the composite outcome (adjudicated): all-cause mortality or cardiovascular related hospitalization
Time Frame: during 2 years follow-up
during 2 years follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
rate of all-cause mortality
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
rate of cardiovascular mortality
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
rate of cardiovascular related hospitalization
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
rate of cerebrovascular events
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
walking distance
Time Frame: 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
6-minute walking test
6, 12, 18 and 24 months
NT-proBNP plasma levels
Time Frame: 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
6, 12, 18 and 24 months
quality of life score
Time Frame: 6, 12, 18 and 24 months
test EQ-5D
6, 12, 18 and 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 19, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 16, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

November 16, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Valve Stenosis

Clinical Trials on aortic valve replacement

3
Subscribe