More Relaxation by Deep Breath on Methacholine (SouProvocBro)

September 28, 2018 updated by: Central Hospital, Nancy, France

More Relaxation by Deep Breath on Methacholine- Than on Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction During the Routine Testing of Asthmatic Children

Deep inhalation (DI) dilates normal airway precontracted with methacholine. The fact that this effect is diminished or absent in asthma could be explained by the presence of bronchial inflammation. The hypothesis tested was that DI induces more relaxation in methacholine induced bronchoconstriction-solely determined by the smooth muscle contraction-than in exercise induced bronchoconstriction, which is contributed to by both smooth muscle contraction and airway wall inflammation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Children were referred to the lung function department by their pediatric pulmonologist. Asthma was defined by a complaint of wheezing, cough, dyspnoea or chest tightness at rest or on exercising and a positive response to methacholine or exercise challenge.

The response to exercise was considered positive when Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 s (FEV1) decreased at least 8% from Baseline.

The response to methacholine was considered positive when FEV1 decreased at least 20% or Rrs increased at least 50% from baseline, at or below a cumulated dose of 1,200 μg.

Bronchodilator medications were discontinued at least 12 hours prior to the testing and provocation allowed when the child had been free of respiratory symptoms for at least 2 weeks and baseline FEV1 was larger than 70% pred. Exercise and methacholine groups were matched for age, height, baseline FEV1 z-score, a moderate level of airway response to challenge and DI amplitude ranging 40-60% of the predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC). Written informed consent was obtained from the children and their parents for the procedures. Procedures for spirometry, exhaled fraction of NO (FENO), GrsDI (Respiratory conductance response to a deep inhalation) and challenges have been described previously. Acceptable GrsDI's were analyzed at a 10-20% FEV1 decrease from baseline. Statistics were performed using Mann-Whitney, Chi square tests and multiple regression as required. Data are median and interquartile range.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

78

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 10 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Seventy-three asthmatic children (48 boys) were selected, 37 underwent exercise challenge and 36 methacholine.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children referred to the lung function department by their pediatric pulmonologist.
  • Asthma defined by a complaint of wheezing, cough and dyspnoea.
  • Positive response to methacholine or exercise challenge.
  • Bronchodilator medications discontinued at least 12 h prior to the testing
  • Provocation allowed when the child had been free of respiratory symptoms for at least 2 weeks and baseline FEV1 larger than 70% pred.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Other respiratory diseases than asthma

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
test with methacholine
test with exercise

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Grs change between before deep breath and after deep breath in exercise and metacholine groups
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 hour
GrsDI represents Grs measured after deep breath reported to Grs before deep breath (bronchial provocation test)
through study completion, an average of 1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 4, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 4, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe