"Cross" Closure for Reconstructing the Perineal Wound of Abdominoperineal Resection (CCRPWAR)

"Cross" Closure for Reconstructing the Perineal Wound of Abdominoperineal Resection in Rectal and Anal Cancer Patients: a Multi-center, Randomized, Open-Label, Positive, Parallel Controlled Clinical Trial

How to reduce the complications of perineal wound after abdominoperineal resection (APR) has always been a hot topic in the medical field.To reduce the complications of perineal wound and the primary healing of perineal wound must meet the two principles of "unobstructed drainage" and " reduced tension closure".This concept is similar to the concepts of closure of enterostomy in rectal cancer patients. It was reported that use of cross-stitch closure can significantly reduce complications of closure of enterostomy. So the investigator ever used the "cross" closure to reconstruct the perineal wound of APR, which was really decrease the complications of perineal wound. However, more clinical trails was needed to confirm the conclusion.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Perineal wound problems after abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer is reported in up to 25%~66% of patients,if the perineum does not heal primarily, the secondary wound healing may prolong hospital stay, may necessitate surgical reintervention, and often requires intensive wound care for several months. Great efforts have been taken to reduce the complications of perineal wound of APR, but the incidence of the perineal wound complications are not effectively decreased.

It was reported that one of the most important factors to determine the primary healing of perineal wound is whether the anterior sacral drainage and perineal stump drainage are sufficient and effective or not, which is similar to the concept of closure of enterostomy.

Previously, it was reported that "cross" closure is an effective method of skin closure for stoma reversal, which allows increased surgical exposure, reduces suture, smooth drainage, aesthetic healing simplifies wound care, and gives a neat cosmetic result.

Therefore, because of the success use of "cross" closure in stoma reversal to reduce the complications of perineal wound, the investigator used the "cross" closure to reconstruct the perineal wound of APR, and it really can decrease the complications of perineal wound. However, more clinical trails are needed to confirm the conclusion.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

346

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age: 18-75 years old;
  2. ECOG performance status: 0-2;
  3. Histologically confirmed rectal cancer or anal canal cancer;
  4. Completely resected the primary tumor;
  5. No evidence of distant metastasis;
  6. Tolerable general anesthesia;
  7. Total radiation dose of 45-50 Gy needed if the patient needs to receive routine segmental radiotherapy;
  8. Provision of written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Emergency surgery required when the patients combined with acute ileus, perforation and hemorrhage;
  2. Extralevator abdominoperineal resection needed;
  3. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) IV or V;
  4. Combined with other tumors;
  5. Severe mental illness;

(7)Serious cardiovascular disease, uncontrolled infections, or other serious uncontrolled concomitant disease; (8)Expectation of lateral lymph node dissection preoperatively

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Traditional Closure
Patients receive primary closure discontinuously for reconstruction of APR perineal wound
Primary closure discontinuously the perineal wound of APR
EXPERIMENTAL: "Cross" Closure
Patients receive "cross" closure for reconstruction of APR perineal wound
Two triangles of skin in the horizontal direction are excised to enlarge the skin incision, and the tumor resected. Then circumferential subcuticular suture of wound, and with tightening of the circumferential suture, the wound resembles a cross.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complication rate of perineal wound
Time Frame: Within 30 days after operation
the complications of perineal wound are include wound infection, wound effusion, wound liquefaction, wound dehiscence, seroma or hematoma ,delayed wound healing, presacral or perineal abscess, perineal or pelvic floor hernia
Within 30 days after operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary wound healing rate
Time Frame: Within 30 days after operation
the Primary wound healing rate within 30 days after operation
Within 30 days after operation
CTCAE grade for complications of perineal wound
Time Frame: Within 30 days after surgery
the CTCAE grade for complications of perineal wound within 30 days after surgery
Within 30 days after surgery
The incidence of each complication of perineal wound
Time Frame: Within 30 days after surgery
The incidence of each complication of perineal wound within 30 days after surgery
Within 30 days after surgery
The rate of reoperation
Time Frame: Within 30 days after surgery
The rate of reoperation within 30 days after surgery
Within 30 days after surgery
The volumes of presacral drainage
Time Frame: Within 3, 5, 7 days after surgery
The volumes of presacral drainage within 3, 5, 7 days after surgery
Within 3, 5, 7 days after surgery
The volumes of presacral residual cavity hydrops
Time Frame: 3 and 7 days postoperatively
The volumes of presacral residual cavity hydrops within 3 and 7 days postoperatively
3 and 7 days postoperatively
The times of dressing change of perineal wound
Time Frame: Within 3, 5, 7 days after surgery
The times of dressing change of perineal wound within 3, 5, 7 days after surgery
Within 3, 5, 7 days after surgery
Removal time of presacral drainage tube
Time Frame: Within 30 days after surgery
Removal time of presacral drainage tube within 30 days after surgery
Within 30 days after surgery
Scar scores for perineal wound and evaluation of patients' overall satisfaction
Time Frame: Within 30 days after surgery
Scar scores for perineal wound and evaluation of patients' overall satisfaction within 30 days after surgery
Within 30 days after surgery
Hospital stay after surgery
Time Frame: Within 30 days after surgery
Hospital stay after surgery within 30 days after surgery
Within 30 days after surgery
The operation time
Time Frame: Intraoperatively
The operation time
Intraoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

November 20, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 20, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 20, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

November 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 9, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Traditional Closure

3
Subscribe